When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
If you think that an OTR truck is faster than a train you are gravely mistaken. If it got to you overnight or two day, it went on a plane. I used to work for UPS, and honestly, their trucking system is extrememly efficient, but nothing can touch the speed of the planes. The only organization that is quick about shipping via truck is the USPS. FedEx is close, but their drivers deliver whenever they feel like it. UPS is close, but they are dealing with a lot more aircraft than trucks.
Buddy I am with you on this one, it is perceptions
If we had a cross country two or three hundred mile per hour system, more people would use it, it would become cheaper, and it would be efficient.
I agree. When I was in France last year (yuck), I rode the TGV from the Garde de Nord(sp?) Terminal to Valencienne, a small city in Northern France.
The train was a bullet train, with comfortable seats, traveling at >150mph.
If I could take one of them from Detroit to NYC or LA for a reasonable price, I'd do it in a heartbeat. Once you've ridden in a bullet train, there's no going back to cattlecars.
I say let's resurect the trains. I have a couple of giant boxes full of "O" gauge Lionel, about 100 foot of track, and four switches, a trestle set, and the biggest transformer Lionel made 40 years ago. I'll get that old coal engine, and the diesel on the tracks, and see if I can get my electric milker running. You guys do the same, and eventually we'll have a setup across the country, running from basement to attic, to basement, etc.
Streets serve every business in the country. Tracks do not. Trucks can reach more places with less investment (by the company served) with smaller lots. Most comanies don't do the volume that would economically justify train service. Also, a company can be more flexible in its location because of the interstate system. Also for most companies to be directly served by trains like they are now served by trucks would require purchasing a huge amount of property for ROW. Image the fight that would occurr if a freight train tried to put tracks through your neighborhood.
HO scale, right here. The buildings are still out because they look kind of interesting and might break after I pack em up and move. I'm putting them in plastic bags before going in the boxes with packing nuts - that'll keep any loose parts from escaping.
I was watching some trains in a town about 10 miles from me today.
One was on a siding waiting for another from the other direction to pass.
I have searched and searched on the net for a site that explains how railroad systems
operate.
Like Amtrak & Canadian pacific Railroad.
I tried "How stuff works" but that was no help.
I have watched movies with Amtrak in them and seen giant boards with lights on them.
Basically I want inside info on train operation on the rails.
ie: North Bound freight pull into siding at springbook to allow south bound freight to pass. ETA approx 17 minutes.after SB'r passes Continue North to ....blah blah....
I would assume that some is computer controlled and maybe some is By Radio/phone.
While waiting for a rundown on the current rail systems, you might have a look at www.davesrailpix.com and see some of the old interurban passenger cars, that in many
areas exist no more.
General Train passing procedure:
1. Train A enters the siding and stops.
2. Train B passes Train A via the main line.
3. Once Train B passes, Train A is only allowed to leave the siding
after obtaining permission from the train dispatcher, either
verbally over the radio or by trackside signals (giant boards
with lights).
i lived in europe for 3 years and loved the train system they have there. its quick, efficent, cheap and gets a person anywher they want. combine that with the bus services and a person can really get anywhere, even to the smallest village.
i have traveled back and forth across the whole of europe on train, it is fairly simply systme to interpret, do not even need to know the language, and the trains were always on time.
it would be great to have that system here, but the infrastructure costs would be huge, and something even bigger would be getting over the culture barrier we have with using cars as our primary mode of transport. but of course the non hub centric layout of many places now days almost makes it next to impossible.
There are a lot of issues with trains -- I'd love to see them built up, but it 's a tough deal.
Friom what I've heard, a lot of the track that still is around is poorly maintained. Trains have to travel 20 - 30 mph in places where they used to routinely go 60. The regular section crews are a thing of the distant past ( as far as I know). The government doesn't maintain tracks as they do airports and highways.
There's also the issue of the railroad companies themselves. For as long as I can remember( and I'm 61), they've tried to narrow their market. It started with passenger service. They were constantly petitioning the government to discontinue ' unprofitable' routes.
They did the same thing with freight. My father in law worked for the Burlington, and he said that all they really wanted to haul was coal. He told me that they owned some coal l fields. I don't know if that was true. I do know that they were constantly closing yards and cutting back on maintenance schedules.
As for freight, I don't know. There probably is nothing as efficient as a train
to haul big loads. The question is who needs the big loads. The obvious answer is manufacturing, and I don't know how much of that we've lost.
Manufacturers can work with rail because they need a LOT of stuff, and they can plan ahead. A lot of lumberyards/building suppliers used to connect to rail as well, but they seem to have gotten away from that.
So, I agree that it would be a good thing to get freight rail back up, but I think it's a tough deal. I don't know aboout passengers. America is a lot bigger than Europe or Japan, so it's not the same concept ( as others have said). As for the high density areas where you might do some short runs, I think that you'd have a heck of a time reestablishing the right of ways to put in the tracks.
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level
Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.