cams and compression ratio

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-03-2004, 09:25 AM
76 F150 Ranger XLT's Avatar
76 F150 Ranger XLT
76 F150 Ranger XLT is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Crownsville, MD
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
cams and compression ratio

I notice that on the cam spec card posted on the Crane website they include a recommended compression ratio under each cam description. According to Crane, the 901 would be OK with 8-9.5 compression while the 941 would be OK with 8.75-10.75 compression. How critical is this? Will the 941 work poorly with stock 8.6 compression pistons or will you just not get the full benefit of that particular cam? And why?
 
  #2  
Old 03-03-2004, 10:32 AM
Scouder's Avatar
Scouder
Scouder is offline
Posting Guru

Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Evanston, WY
Posts: 2,117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The reason for increased compression with increased duration is that the effective compression, called dynamic compression, is reduced with long duration. The intake valve does not close until the piston is already on it's way up the compression stroke. Longer duration typically causes it to close even later, reducing the amount of stroke that is "left over" to create compression. So, to compensate for the "lost" compression the static compression ratio is raised by a commensurate amount.

So you can see from this that if you don't raise compression with a longer duration cam the net result is lowered compression and the HP loss associated with it.

There are other factors to be considered when bumping compression like this, but the cam manufacturers are usually pretty close.

-Scouder
 
  #3  
Old 03-03-2004, 10:38 AM
76 F150 Ranger XLT's Avatar
76 F150 Ranger XLT
76 F150 Ranger XLT is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Crownsville, MD
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks. That makes more sense than I expected. I am pretty certain my 1976 390 has stock 8.6 compression so I would probably be wasting money, gas, and horsepower if I went with the Crane 941.
 
  #4  
Old 03-03-2004, 03:47 PM
stephenw's Avatar
stephenw
stephenw is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Central Oregon
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You can also compensate for less than desireable CR by using their High-Intensity lifters. They bleed down a little at lower RPM's (oil pressure) and that has the effect of delaying the valve timing a bit, but after the engine gets a few more revs the cam timing comes back to spec and you get the high-end too! I did that with a 390 at Crane tech's suggestion, and it worked like a charm!
JFWIW. Steve
 
  #5  
Old 03-04-2004, 02:34 PM
76 F150 Ranger XLT's Avatar
76 F150 Ranger XLT
76 F150 Ranger XLT is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Crownsville, MD
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I hate to demonstrate my ignorance, but what exactly is "bleed down" and do I need to be concerned about it?
 
  #6  
Old 03-04-2004, 06:46 PM
stephenw's Avatar
stephenw
stephenw is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Central Oregon
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is what is called "bleed off" which reduces some of the dynamic compression with a more radical cam that Scouder is talking about, which helps to enable a higher CR.
The "bleed down" that I am referring to essentially shortens the High-Intensity lifters at lower RPMs because there is less oil pressure to pump them up to their max. This basically has the opposite effect of "bleed off", because it leaves the valves closed longer at low RPMs and allows use of a radical cam in a low(er) CR engine.
Camshaft design is a real art in many respects, so the cam mfr will have the best shot at matching up to your expressed needs/desires/application, rather than your buddies in the back yard! And I have found the Crane techs very helpful.
Good Luck, Steve
 
  #7  
Old 03-05-2004, 06:36 AM
76 F150 Ranger XLT's Avatar
76 F150 Ranger XLT
76 F150 Ranger XLT is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Crownsville, MD
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry to keep dragging this link back to the top of the board but Your response leads to several other questions. When you installed the 941 and the high-intensity lifters did you do any oiling mods to the heads and/or install a higher volume oil pump?

Also, what CR were you running on the engine with the 941?
 
  #8  
Old 03-05-2004, 05:01 PM
stephenw's Avatar
stephenw
stephenw is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Central Oregon
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unfortunately, I did not build that engine myself, so don't know the CR. The cranking cylinder pressures were down around 135-140psi, so I would speculate that its CR was around 8.5:1. I could lug the heck out of it and press it hard and it very rarely let out any detonation sounds. It was otherwise totally stock, C4AE heads with stock non-adjustable rockers, Edel Performer intake, no oil mods nor HV pump.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Snorri_B
335 Series- 5.8/351M, 6.6/400, 351 Cleveland
5
12-19-2013 01:10 PM
brandon75_390
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
10
02-24-2006 12:01 PM
skonnie-mark
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
2
06-17-2005 01:08 PM
rusty70f100
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
26
05-26-2004 08:58 PM
kameleon
Ford Inline Six, 200, 250, 4.9L / 300
5
10-04-2001 08:22 AM



Quick Reply: cams and compression ratio



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:10 AM.