When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
just measured the stroke for the first time on my engine and it is 3 7/8" what is this out of. i thought that is was a 390 .060 over but the stoke is to long for a 390.
got her apart to find the source of the wonderful metal shavings in the oil pan.
nothin has that stroke, not an FE anyway, id bet money on its a 390, when you measure with a dowel in the cylinder your not going to come up exact by no means. like i said before hers the stroke for FE's
or are you measuring the distance from the top of the piston at BDC to the top of the deck surface? Since you have her apart, what is the crank number stamped in the second counterweight?
I just went through this. What I found to work was: take the heads off (I assume you already have) and pick a cylinder. Then bottom out that piston and measure distance to the deck of the block. Next, top out that same piston, and take another measurement to the deck of the block. The difference between the two measurements is the stroke.
Keep in mind that the first couple of times that I did this, I came out with some funky numbers, so I used a straightedge across the deck since the tops of the cylinders were worn enough to throw off my calibrated eye. Good luck!
i know this is off topic a bit but normally does a 390's pistons come just about level with the deck surface, i noticed when i was putting my 390 back togather my pistons just about come level with the decks surface.
Originally posted by gunnabebad
got her apart to find the source of the wonderful metal shavings in the oil pan.
If you have it apart, find the casting #'s on the crank. If it's a 390, it should be a 2U (or possibly others). Post back when you find them. Then we'll know for sure.
Fordman428, when I did my 390, the block was decked a little bit, and my TRW flat-tops came right up to the top of the block. I'm assuming that that means that for a totally stock block, they should have been down in the cylinders .010-.020" ???
And, for gunnabebad, if you measured the stroke from the top of the block with the piston at BDC, this will give 3.78 + .010-.020 deck, makes your measurement almost perfect for a 390 if the deck height is .009".
unless you specifically got car or high compression pistons your pistons sit that extra .125 (give or take more or less) in the hole at the top of the stroke too, you have a 390. you will not have 3 3/4" without bringing the pistons to zero deck height when you had the engine rebuilt. freakazoid came the closest, you really need to measure it with reference to the top and bottom of the stroke instead of just from the deck to the top of the piston
Originally posted by FE427TP unless you specifically got car or high compression pistons your pistons sit that extra .125 (give or take more or less) in the hole at the top of the stroke too, you have a 390. you will not have 3 3/4" without bringing the pistons to zero deck height when you had the engine rebuilt. freakazoid came the closest, you really need to measure it with reference to the top and bottom of the stroke instead of just from the deck to the top of the piston
I don't remember my old 360, or the 360 I used to build a 390, having .125" from the deck to the top of the piston at TDC.
A 390 with .125" deck clearance, with flat-top pistons, like the TRW's (with 9.7cc valve relief and a 67cc head, 10cc head gasket), gives a compression of 8.0645:1
My 360's had concave (dished) pistons, so did regular car 390 pistons, and the compression on those are 8:1. So, it sounds like you're way off... unless the 390 uses flat top pistons that are .125" down the cylinder? But, that ain't so...
Are you sure you're not thinking of the FT engines? They were pretty low, around 7:1 or so...
My 360's had concave (dished) pistons, so did regular car 390 pistons, and the compression on those are 8:1. So, it sounds like you're way off... unless the 390 uses flat top pistons that are .125" down the cylinder? But, that ain't so...
well 390's in trucks did use 410 pistons that were .100 shorter than regular 390 pistons which would also make it .100 below deck, then they weren't level with the deck from the factory anyways this would make it more than .100 down from the deck, more like .115-.135 if using 410 and 428 specs for deck height, can you see the .010 or less difference on a tape measure? since the stroke is 3 7/8 which is within the tolerances I just mentioned he obviously doesn't have a 428 crank and it's not 3 1/2 so it's not a 360 so what else will it be?
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.