5.8L 351 Windsor-Rebuilding/Modifying
#18
#19
Originally posted by lancer
Hey Pud. Were do you get these cranks that use the 302 rods and pistons. I'd love to get one for an engine i plan on building. Thanks Lance
Hey Pud. Were do you get these cranks that use the 302 rods and pistons. I'd love to get one for an engine i plan on building. Thanks Lance
http://scatcrankshafts.com/ -series 9000
http://store.summitracing.com/section.asp?d=1&s=56 -youll find it
#20
#21
Originally posted by jwtaylor
victorcharlie
Yeah the 268 has a lope, nothing that I would consider too radical, but a performance sound for sure. You might go for one of the smaller grinds like the XE250H or XE256H, they would have improved torque over the 268 but not as much hp in the upper rpms. later
victorcharlie
Yeah the 268 has a lope, nothing that I would consider too radical, but a performance sound for sure. You might go for one of the smaller grinds like the XE250H or XE256H, they would have improved torque over the 268 but not as much hp in the upper rpms. later
#22
victorcharlie
Here is the actual graph, it shows the 262 vs 268 with stock heads, then 262 vs 268 with gt-40p. Stock or gt-40p, 8.5:1 was the compression ratio. Performer 600 carb and performer intake with shorty headers. Either one isn't that bad, you would get theoretically better gas mileage with the smaller cams, but then again stranger things have happened. See what you think:
Here is the actual graph, it shows the 262 vs 268 with stock heads, then 262 vs 268 with gt-40p. Stock or gt-40p, 8.5:1 was the compression ratio. Performer 600 carb and performer intake with shorty headers. Either one isn't that bad, you would get theoretically better gas mileage with the smaller cams, but then again stranger things have happened. See what you think:
#23
I don't think you'll be happy with that much cam in a truck. I put a 260H in and it was supposed to provide more power from 1500 on up but what I actually found was no increase in power until about 2200-2500 which was too high for off the line and most highway with o/d where you are running 2000-2200 most of the time , I got a 252 instead and it hauls *** from about 1800 on up you can really feel it in the seat of your pants and it idles nice.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
chuck123
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
1
08-06-2008 09:30 PM
KerryDRogers
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
9
06-11-2003 06:37 PM