Green Rotella?
Blackstone says the oil sample looked as it should and all numbers were at or below the universal average except
Nickel My count 1 Avg 0
Calcium My count 3649 Avg 3095
Fuel <0.5 Should Be <2.0
Antifreeze and water were 0.0 yippeee
Nothing about the actual green tinge but obviously not a problem.
So where did the Nickel come from and is the Calcium level too high and what do I need to do to bring it down?
Thanks for all the responses
John
I'd make guesses about your calcium and your nickel levels, but I hate being wrong. Check out the site I've attached- When they return my tests they include an explanation for every single element on the test. I'd send a sample to them because they can compare your sample to samples of the same engine & oil combination.
http://www.oaitesting.com/
Mykro:
Thanks for the Rotella link.
As for the other Delo / Rotella post above- I am not aware of any evidence of the claims made in that post. International and Ford both approved Rotella. Moreover, even Chevron (Delo) does not claim a longer change interval. I am uncertain where the suggestion of a longer (non-synthetic) interval originates.
I see a lot of high-mileage Rotella trucks and I have never heard of injector issues related to that oil.
I would be interested in some facts though...
FarmerPhilCo: send along some facts - this is an interesting claim.
-Mike
I did send an e-mail off to the Shell folks and they said it's not normal.
FarmerPhilCo:
Please shoot us some facts on that statement, I'm always learning and am interested in this.
mschultz:
Thanks for the link, Blackstone has what I was looking for on their website and also sent a hard copy in the mail with explanations.
Calcium: Detergent/dispersant additive Now I'm wondering if this is the cause of the "Green Tinge", probably not but I'm not going to worry about it.
Thanks for all the great info folks
John
HEUI: Hydraulically actuated Electronic Fuel Injection system. Your fuel injectors do not use a mechanical fuel pump with a cam and plungers to force fuel through the injector and into the cylinder. The injector has a solinoid, and oil passage, and a fuel passage with corrosponding passages through the head itself. When the flywheel, crank, and cam sensor agree they tell the computer to tell the injector solinoid to actuate and it proceeds to stop the flow of oil and redirects it down, which in turn forces the fuel to exit the injector and into the cylinder; the oil then flows into its normal passage and repeats.
The reason not to Shell is not really that it can hurt your engine but that it breaks down to soon compared to Delo 400. The oil needs to be good for it to fire the injector efficiently. You save money in the long run by increasing your drain interval.
Secondly, I will address the mildew in the oil. Mildew will accumulate in any place that will allow it. A bathroom, sauna, pool area, under a kitchen sink, standing water, etc., and you get the point. These engines are very cold compared to any gasoline engine. Because of this the engines need to be warmed whenever they are run. They are not made to just start up, go to the store and come back. When they are not warmed they produce condensation in the crankcase which then turns into mildew.
I will be glad to assist anyone, feel free to ask. I am young but I have many years of heavy duty diesel experience, and a dt444e putting out 789 ft/lbs.
I wonder if you could assist me and I am feeling free to ask: Did you make up "flywheel sensor" agreeing with "crank sensor" yourself? Do they have to agree? What happens if they have an argument? Is this in case they suddenly decide to rotate at different RPMs or in different directions? Or is it possible that you are covering for the fact they you have no data to back up the Rotella statement?
If you can point to some tests which demonstrate that Rotella "breaks down to soon compared to Delo 400" we would love to see them. Otherwise, it might be a good idea not to make libelous statements.
-Mike
PhilCo
I wonder if you could assist me and I am feeling free to ask: Did you make up "flywheel sensor" agreeing with "crank sensor" yourself? Do they have to agree? What happens if they have an argument? Is this in case they suddenly decide to rotate at different RPMs or in different directions? Or is it possible that you are covering for the fact they you have no data to back up the Rotella statement?
If you can point to some tests which demonstrate that Rotella "breaks down to soon compared to Delo 400" we would love to see them. Otherwise, it might be a good idea not to make libelous statements.
-Mike
I was defining the way a HEUI fuel system works in such a way that a person who has no knowledge of how a diesel engine or a diesel engine with a particular fuel system works, would be able to understand with as much ease as possible. I felt that "agree," was the best word to use. You state, "it might be a good idea not to make libelous statements." Your questions that you loaded to make me seem incompetent and unknowledgable are libelous in nature. My using the word "agree" and my statements about how a HEUI fuel system work have nothing directly to do with the "possibility that I are covering for the fact they you have no data to back up the Rotella statement?"
I have nothing against Shell heavy duty oil, I prefer it over any other in heavy-duty off-road, low ground speed applications. Mostly because these types of engines use mechanical fuel injection systems (would you like me to e-mail you my definition of this type of system before I post it?) and their performance is not compromised by the inherent foaming chracteristics of shell.
I assume that you have some formal understanding about engine mechanics from your previous posts. So in the future, make sure the arguement passes the respect test, and don't ask questions that a person without any mechanical knowledge can see is not relevant with the arguement and are not even valid questions.
I say all this without offense if at all possible.
thank you
farmer phil
fpcenterprises
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Also Mike, if your crank and flywheel sensors are revolving in different directions and at different rpms, you have a lot more to worry about than what type of oil you are using in your engine!
re "faoming"
I mix a gas, a scoop of nutella (melted) and a handful of sand with my engine oil to keep if from foaming. Sometimes you have to add extra sand because the oil filter gets in the way. I have heard that if you do this on a full moon, you don't have to change our oil again for 3 years, regardless of whether or not your flywheel counter-rotates.
-Mike
Yeah, that must be it; You are better eduacated than I am.
Does this mean that in addition to non-existing sensors "agreeing" with other sensors, you made up the "foaming characteristics" bit as well?
I'd better get to bed, the short bus arrives early.
-Mike
Once again thanks to everyone
Happy Dieseling
John
If the flywheel sensor is "imaginatory" please explain how the tachometer works.
If the crank sensor is imaginatory, please explain how the comp gets the information to regulate fuel.
If they do not exist please inform me as to how I will go about working on computer controlled diesels, have i been living a lie for all these years? I guess that I thought that an electronic diesel used a mechanically controlled fuel system.


