1978 - 1996 Big Bronco  
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Heavy fuel consumption

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 01-17-2004, 06:47 AM
invjbo's Avatar
invjbo
invjbo is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angry Heavy fuel consumption

Hi there,

I have an 1988 Bronco with the 5.0 injection engine. The engine runs all well, but i have a feeling that the fuel consumption is very high. It consumes just above 3 litres for 10 kilometers, under mixed driving conditions. No heavy gas fot!

I am not sure how to convert this int your way of putting thing miles/ gallon. but i am under the impression that it is about 30 % to high.

Any ideas where to start looking for the cause
 
  #2  
Old 01-17-2004, 06:56 AM
luckild's Avatar
luckild
luckild is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Have the engine checked for codes. You do not give us mileage or any maintenance history. Any recent tune-up's, fuel filter, air filter,plug's, wires, dist. cap and rotor. This info will help other user's to direct you in the right directions. Let us know and good luck.
 
  #3  
Old 01-17-2004, 06:39 PM
rbrewrr's Avatar
rbrewrr
rbrewrr is offline
Junior User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Spokane US
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For those of us in the USA, it works out to about 7.84 miles per gallon. This is excessive, although I'm only getting about 10 mpg with a 5.8L engine in an 87 bronco. Since your 5.0 is probably fuel injected, perhaps some of your sensors are bad and giving the computer bad info, resulting in really high fuel consumption.
 
  #4  
Old 01-17-2004, 07:15 PM
BOJOFASO's Avatar
BOJOFASO
BOJOFASO is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
has it always used this much fuel? if not the most logical place to start would be fuel pressure regulator or the timing.
 
  #5  
Old 01-17-2004, 07:40 PM
jameswkingery's Avatar
jameswkingery
jameswkingery is offline
New User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: scottsdale
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
heavy fuel consumption

I recently had this problem with my 93 Lightning.
problem was the 02 sensor not allowing ecu to stay in closed loop. un fortunately my problem crossed over two new(Bosch) o2 sensors. i couldn't get them to work until i used a new Motorcraft sensor.
during the troubleshooting, i replaced MAP sensor, fuel pump, fuel filters, plugs, wiring, cap/rotor, and installed new injectors. the Bosch units apparantly responded too slowly, and the ECU fell into open-loop and tried to cool the engine by going full rich.
we only isolated the problem using a state-of th art chassis dyno and looking at the air/fuel ratio and nox as the truck was running(loaded) on the dyno.

good luck-our hard clue was full rich AFR above 2500 rpm loaded. the afr actually fell below the machine's ability to measure(<10:1)
 
  #6  
Old 01-17-2004, 08:26 PM
arizonius's Avatar
arizonius
arizonius is offline
New User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was getting about 7MPG on my 89 Bronco w/ a 302. I replaced my Oxy Sensor and the EGR Valve/Sensor.

Just filled up yesterday and I was at 10MPG.
 
  #7  
Old 01-18-2004, 10:56 AM
jameswkingery's Avatar
jameswkingery
jameswkingery is offline
New User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: scottsdale
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you might want to verify that the thermostat is the proper temp. i know that the memory mapping for the computer richens things up until the engine temp sensor reaches a certain value.
i live in scottsdale, and cooling for summer is a major consideration, but on my truck, at least 195 deg seems required. mine originally had a 205 deg stat. running hot in summer was cured when i replaced the plastic tank radiator with a 4-row brass one from auto zone(110$$$ cheaper than checker for same brand)
it seems to me that your 5.0 should get 12-14 mpg, unless you have really lowered the rear end ratio, or spend a lot of time in 4wd
 
  #8  
Old 01-19-2004, 02:41 AM
invjbo's Avatar
invjbo
invjbo is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thank you all for good ideas. I´ve had the car for about 2 years and it has run this rich. There are no mods to the engine or other stuff. The only thing is bigger tires. Cooper Discoverer LT 33´

I more or less always run in 2wd.

Interesting with the engine temperature idea and the sensors.
Will erratic sensors show up on the codes?
 
  #9  
Old 01-19-2004, 05:09 AM
jameswkingery's Avatar
jameswkingery
jameswkingery is offline
New User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: scottsdale
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
mileage

you might want to visit a speedometer shop for a recalibration-the much larger tires will cause the mileage to be artifically low.
the main sensor that affects mileage is the o2 sensor. a bad one will not necessarily set any codes.
bad or dirty injectors, or ignition problems will also not set codes. the main result will be sluggish performance.
my problem was masked because i had gotten two sensors in a row which were slow to respond, and caused loss of closed loop control.
a bad temp sensor or running too cool causes the computer to go into a fuel map area which enriches mixture(cold), or really enriches mixture(too hot) in an attempt to cool the engine, and allow limp home mode.
good luck sorting this out.
for a really good article about fuel injection in general, go to http:www.chevythunder.com
it's about retrofitting chevy tpi to other chassis, but the chev fi and ford fi are extremely similar, and use the same computer chipset(OBD II)
compared to today's computers. the earlier ones are pretty dumb, but the conrol of engine functions is still very similar.
 
  #10  
Old 01-19-2004, 12:26 PM
92exploder's Avatar
92exploder
92exploder is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i had this in my 86 302. it turned out to be an injector stuck open.
 
  #11  
Old 01-19-2004, 12:54 PM
BillyBob69's Avatar
BillyBob69
BillyBob69 is offline
Lead Driver

Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Wheatland, Mo
Posts: 7,333
Received 23 Likes on 21 Posts
92EXPLODER.....wouldnt that cause your engine to run differently? I mean in a noticable way. I get lousy mileage too but it has just started about 2 weeks ago.
 
  #12  
Old 01-19-2004, 01:14 PM
Kemicalburns's Avatar
Kemicalburns
Kemicalburns is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bend,OR
Posts: 14,271
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
invjbo , having those 33's and stock gearing doesn't help your gas mileage either. swapping to a set of 4.10 gears front and rear would put you back to stock.

late
 
  #13  
Old 01-19-2004, 05:25 PM
92exploder's Avatar
92exploder
92exploder is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by BillyBob69
92EXPLODER.....wouldnt that cause your engine to run differently? I mean in a noticable way. I get lousy mileage too but it has just started about 2 weeks ago.
yeah it ran like crap for a few days and then died. the cyl. filled with gas like hydrolock. if you turned it over with the plug out it shot out a jet of gas.
 

Last edited by 92exploder; 01-19-2004 at 05:37 PM.
  #14  
Old 01-19-2004, 05:42 PM
BillyBob69's Avatar
BillyBob69
BillyBob69 is offline
Lead Driver

Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Wheatland, Mo
Posts: 7,333
Received 23 Likes on 21 Posts
OK well I am just getting bad mileage...still runs fine tho
 
  #15  
Old 01-19-2004, 05:55 PM
Kemicalburns's Avatar
Kemicalburns
Kemicalburns is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bend,OR
Posts: 14,271
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
im getting 13 with my 351 and 31's. but the motor is a 95 351 roller cam motor so that might help a tad as well.

late
 


Quick Reply: Heavy fuel consumption



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:16 PM.