Notices

Octane Boosters

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 22, 2004 | 09:27 AM
  #16  
pops_91710's Avatar
pops_91710
Thread Starter
|
Laughing Gas
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,166
Likes: 0
From: Chino, California
That 429 is awesome! I had one in a Torino GT and it was a kick in the pants, literally!

I don't know what fuels are offered in the state of Washington, But here in California Unocal sells racing fuel but it's outrageously expensive.

As for the lead substitute, who needs it? If I remember correctly the '73's came with hardened valve seats to accomodate the new lo-lead gasolines, and should hold up well with no-lead gas.

What's the c/r on that 429? 11:1?
 
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2004 | 05:23 PM
  #17  
Icicle's Avatar
Icicle
Postmaster
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,038
Likes: 2
From: Spokane WA
Originally posted by pops_91710
That 429 is awesome! I had one in a Torino GT and it was a kick in the pants, literally!

I don't know what fuels are offered in the state of Washington, But here in California Unocal sells racing fuel but it's outrageously expensive.

As for the lead substitute, who needs it? If I remember correctly the '73's came with hardened valve seats to accomodate the new lo-lead gasolines, and should hold up well with no-lead gas.

What's the c/r on that 429? 11:1?
Yes we have racing fuel here, but I only know of 1 76 station in town that sells it, and not sure if they do anymore........

Yes youre right on the seats in the 73's, but my motor is earlier than that, 70 or 71 I think, but cant remember which, it came outa a land yacht of some sort based on the block number (D0VE-A)

I THINK the compression ratio is 10.5:1 but again, Im not sure, I read about lead being something that resists detonation, thus improving Octane greatly with just a few grams per gallon, Im not sure if Lead SUBSTITUTE would accomplish that as well, so thought I would pose that question, thanks for all the replys guys, keep em' coming

I bought the whole truck for $500 because the guy said it was backfiring through the carb and he couldnt figure out why, so either I get to adjust timing (which he said he did) or worst case have some head work done to the D0VE-c's that are on it I guess, but getting it running is the first step....
 
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2004 | 09:23 PM
  #18  
pops_91710's Avatar
pops_91710
Thread Starter
|
Laughing Gas
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,166
Likes: 0
From: Chino, California
10.5 should be able to run pump premium. Remember: 92 octane is R+M/2. In other words 92 is the average of reasearch combined with mechanical.

Have you tried 92?
 
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2004 | 06:29 AM
  #19  
Icicle's Avatar
Icicle
Postmaster
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,038
Likes: 2
From: Spokane WA
No, its not up and running yet, just planning

thanks for that though im glad you think that, I am a little nervous though because some here dont think so, and if it does run on 92 EXCELLENT......

Is there a difference between gas stations? or is 92 at chevron gonna be the same as 92 at texaco?

thanks for all your replies, your making me feel better at least
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2004 | 08:37 PM
  #20  
pops_91710's Avatar
pops_91710
Thread Starter
|
Laughing Gas
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,166
Likes: 0
From: Chino, California
92 octane is the same anywhere you go. It is a standard set my the industry.

I believe some of these newer hot cars are running around the 10.5 c/r which is why they have to burn premium (92). Beemers, Lexus and the like. So you should do okay. Just may have to back off on ther spark advance a little if it pings at specs. You might look into buying a knock sensor and add it on. I am not sure if they still sell them anymore. I'll do a little research and see..

Dropping your c/r a half a point really won't kill too many horses if any. Just use a thicker head gasket.
 
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2004 | 06:30 AM
  #21  
Icicle's Avatar
Icicle
Postmaster
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,038
Likes: 2
From: Spokane WA
okay..will look into all that thanks.
 
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2004 | 07:17 AM
  #22  
AT6AERO's Avatar
AT6AERO
Junior User
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: NE Ohio
Check out www.elektro.com/~audi/audi/toluene.html
 
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2004 | 11:19 AM
  #23  
FERacing66's Avatar
FERacing66
Posting Guru
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,354
Likes: 0
From: Jackassville
yeah, another scam you usually never need more octane than 91 anyway anyomore and it doseant do anything.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

 Brett Foote
story-2

10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-3

Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

 Brett Foote
story-4

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-9

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
Old Mar 28, 2004 | 03:08 PM
  #24  
Icicle's Avatar
Icicle
Postmaster
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,038
Likes: 2
From: Spokane WA
Originally Posted by FERacing66
yeah, another scam you usually never need more octane than 91 anyway anyomore and it doseant do anything.

Ummmm, no its not a scam, and yes I do need it, why dont you read the thread and interject if you have something positive to say instead of making a comment that isnt really relevant and doesnt seem to make sense.

thanks
 

Last edited by Icicle; Mar 28, 2004 at 03:10 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2004 | 08:49 PM
  #25  
Saurian's Avatar
Saurian
Posting Guru
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,155
Likes: 3
From: Centerville, Iowa
I've found that my 300-6 runs a bit smoother actually when it runs on 87 octane, as opposed to the 89 I usually run cause its cheaper. It just seems to bring on revs a bit better to me. But *shrug* just me.

I thought lead was good for engines? Just..bad for the sniffer? Perhaps not for high performance vehicles, but some responded well I thought. Like 70's, 80's, and early 90's.
 
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2004 | 09:02 PM
  #26  
pops_91710's Avatar
pops_91710
Thread Starter
|
Laughing Gas
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,166
Likes: 0
From: Chino, California
Originally Posted by Saurian
I've found that my 300-6 runs a bit smoother actually when it runs on 87 octane, as opposed to the 89 I usually run cause its cheaper. It just seems to bring on revs a bit better to me. But *shrug* just me.

I thought lead was good for engines? Just..bad for the sniffer? Perhaps not for high performance vehicles, but some responded well I thought. Like 70's, 80's, and early 90's.

I can't imagine what 2 points lower in octane would do for an engine that could make it run better. My 300 I-6 never ran on anything but 87 octane for 13 years. Never needed anything more than that.

At least you are fair minded enough to recognize that it could be just you.

As for lead being 'good' for engines, not so. It pollutes the oil sooner. It was a cheap way to make higher octane fuels.

It was a beneficial additive for engines when they were designed to run on leaded fuels in that they had softer valve seats and the lead deposits on the seats made a 'cushion' for the valve to seat against. But that was changed thirty years ago when they began to harden the seats due to federal regs requiring lo-lead fuels.

Leaded fuels are more than bad for the sniffer, it' destroys the cat(s) as well, and will plug it up real quickly. Today's high performance engines cannot burn nor do they need leaded fuel.

Older engines can have the seats changed when the heads are off by a good machine shop.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jage
6.2L V8
17
Sep 19, 2018 08:36 AM
89f350xlt
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
5
Nov 7, 2015 06:43 PM
lamarqueford
Performance & General Engine Building
1
Feb 22, 2014 12:03 PM
judithgap
6.2L V8
10
Jun 14, 2013 07:03 PM
Big_Man_Brad
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
1
Feb 6, 2008 11:24 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:13 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

Slideshow: Top 10 Fords at 2026 Ford Nationals

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-09 11:10:08


VIEW MORE
story-1
3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

Based on years of owning multiple modern Ford products.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-09 10:53:36


VIEW MORE
story-2
10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

SPONSORED: From muddy boots to rain-soaked cargo, these upgrades address some of the most common frustrations Ford truck owners face every day.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-06-08 18:50:34


VIEW MORE
story-3
Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

Here's everything you need to know about every Ford engine available for the 2026 model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-05 12:58:01


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-5
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-6
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-9
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE