Notices
2023+ Super Duty The 2023+ Ford F250, F350, F450, F550 & F600 Super Duty Pickup and Chassis Cab

Interesting video ranking ford engine reliability

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 18, 2025 | 07:15 PM
  #1  
ssls6's Avatar
ssls6
Thread Starter
|
More Turbo
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 534
Likes: 168
From: Park County, CO
Interesting video ranking ford engine reliability

Just this video from Town and Country Ford ranking ford engines based on their dealerships repair history. Interesting video to watch if you like data.

 
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2025 | 07:56 PM
  #2  
Stugots5170's Avatar
Stugots5170
Cross-Country
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2025
Posts: 83
Likes: 28
From: Detroit, MI
1. 6.2L Boss
2. 7.3L Godzilla
3. 6.8L Godzilla
4. 6.7L PowerStroke

I disagree with him about the 6.2L being less stressed because it just wasn't that powerful. The 6.2L had a higher hp/L than the Godzilla, especially in the higher output F150/Raptor versions. The 6.2L had a 12 year lifespan, Ford had a lot of time to refine the design from lessons learned from the Modular V8's from which it was based.

I wish he would have went back further with SuperDuty engines and included the 6.8L V10, 7.3L IDI, 5.4L (2v/3v), 6.4L PSD, 6.0L PSD.

Dead last would have to be the 5.4L 3V.

Watched the F150 Section too:

1. 3.3L
2. 5.0L
3. 2.7L Turbo
4. 3.5L Turbo
5. 3.5L Turbo PowerBoost
6. 3.5L Turbo HO
7. EV
 
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2025 | 05:35 AM
  #3  
1olddogtwo's Avatar
1olddogtwo
Cargo Master
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 2,292
Likes: 1,064
Originally Posted by Stugots5170
1. 6.2L Boss
2. 7.3L Godzilla
3. 6.8L Godzilla
4. 6.7L PowerStroke

I disagree with him about the 6.2L being less stressed because it just wasn't that powerful. The 6.2L had a higher hp/L than the Godzilla, especially in the higher output F150/Raptor versions. The 6.2L had a 12 year lifespan, Ford had a lot of time to refine the design from lessons learned from the Modular V8's from which it was based.

I wish he would have went back further with SuperDuty engines and included the 6.8L V10, 7.3L IDI, 5.4L (2v/3v).

Dead last would have to be the 5.4L 3V.

Watched the F150 Section too:

1. 3.3L
2. 5.0L
3. 2.7L Turbo
4. 3.5L Turbo
5. 3.5L Turbo PowerBoost
6. 3.5L Turbo HO
7. EV
You missed the 6.0/6.4 era.
 
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2025 | 06:04 AM
  #4  
ssls6's Avatar
ssls6
Thread Starter
|
More Turbo
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 534
Likes: 168
From: Park County, CO
The 7.3L is a good example of how "based on forums like this" you'd think every engine is on the edge of blowing up. Their service departments (sounds like they have more than one dealership) would rank it closer to the 6.2L which I've owned and it was solid.

I the F150 stuff was really interesting, not surprised by the 3.3L NA V6 or the Coyote being next. A bit surprised by the 2.3L eco being more reliable than the 2.7L eco. They've built so many 2.7L eco's in the F150 you'd think they would be better at it.
 
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2025 | 06:09 AM
  #5  
Split rims's Avatar
Split rims
Fleet Mechanic
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Mar 2021
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 1,305
The 6.2/6R140 was a very reliable drive train.
Very.
 
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2025 | 06:40 AM
  #6  
Stugots5170's Avatar
Stugots5170
Cross-Country
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2025
Posts: 83
Likes: 28
From: Detroit, MI
Originally Posted by 1olddogtwo
You missed the 6.0/6.4 era.
yep. Edited.
 
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2025 | 03:58 PM
  #7  
ATC Crazy's Avatar
ATC Crazy
Hotshot
Community Builder
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 10
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 12,278
Likes: 4,287
From: SW VA
Originally Posted by 1olddogtwo
You missed the 6.0/6.4 era.
No one ‘missed’ that era…
 
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2025 | 04:16 PM
  #8  
acdii's Avatar
acdii
Lead Driver
Photoriffic
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
Joined: Feb 2022
Posts: 7,930
Likes: 4,021
Whats missing here?

How many have been built? These videos are a waste of time because they look at what came in the door, but totally exclude how many are actually on the road. To put it in a better perspective, lets see the percentage of repairs to the amount actually built. Between 2011 and 2017 for the first Gen 3.5 EB, there were 4.6 million F150's sold. How many have the 3.5? How many the 5.0? 2018 and up the numbers sold were even higher at around 900K per year so 5.4 million of the Gen 2.

Now show the number of repairs based on number in operation. Statistically there will always be a higher number of repairs when there are higher numbers in use, so with out that, this videos are useless.
 
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2025 | 05:57 PM
  #9  
Joe T's Avatar
Joe T
Hotshot
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 10,099
Likes: 1,346
From: Chaz
Originally Posted by ssls6
The 7.3L is a good example of how "based on forums like this" you'd think every engine is on the edge of blowing up. Their service departments (sounds like they have more than one dealership) would rank it closer to the 6.2L which I've owned and it was solid.

I the F150 stuff was really interesting, not surprised by the 3.3L NA V6 or the Coyote being next. A bit surprised by the 2.3L eco being more reliable than the 2.7L eco. They've built so many 2.7L eco's in the F150 you'd think they would be better at it.
I liked my 2.7 eco more than my 3.5 eco. Was hot, sounded better too. Neither one will tow a lot comfortably regardless of what they are rated for.
 
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2025 | 05:57 AM
  #10  
1olddogtwo's Avatar
1olddogtwo
Cargo Master
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 2,292
Likes: 1,064
Originally Posted by ATC Crazy
No one ‘missed’ that era…
True.

But the sound of a 6.0.... music.
 
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2025 | 07:44 AM
  #11  
HeatStroked's Avatar
HeatStroked
Fleet Mechanic
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,736
Likes: 81
From: Phoenix, AZ
I curently own a F150 with the 6.2 that I bought new. Not a single problem at 120K miles. Hope I don't kick myself in the *** buying a 2026 F250 with the 7.3.
 
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2025 | 08:14 AM
  #12  
FishOnOne's Avatar
FishOnOne
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,785
Likes: 2,557
From: The Great State of Texas
Originally Posted by 1olddogtwo
True.

But the sound of a 6.0.... music.
That sweet turbo whistle was music to my ears. Something I miss with my 6.7PSD
 
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2025 | 08:42 AM
  #13  
Stugots5170's Avatar
Stugots5170
Cross-Country
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2025
Posts: 83
Likes: 28
From: Detroit, MI
Originally Posted by HeatStroked
I curently own a F150 with the 6.2 that I bought new. Not a single problem at 120K miles. Hope I don't kick myself in the *** buying a 2026 F250 with the 7.3.
I always felt the 6.2L in the F150 was an under appreciated option. Overshadowed by the Coyote and EcoBoost.

I tried finding one back then but couldn’t find one in my price range, ended up settling with a EcoBoost instead.
 
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2025 | 08:43 AM
  #14  
HeatStroked's Avatar
HeatStroked
Fleet Mechanic
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,736
Likes: 81
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by FishOnOne
That sweet turbo whistle was music to my ears. Something I miss with my 6.7PSD
I had th 7.3 PS with a DP Tuner, Wicked Wheel and real dual exhaust. Damn thing ran decent and sounded sweet.
 
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2025 | 11:47 AM
  #15  
ATC Crazy's Avatar
ATC Crazy
Hotshot
Community Builder
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 10
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 12,278
Likes: 4,287
From: SW VA
Originally Posted by 1olddogtwo
True.

But the sound of a 6.0.... music.
To each their own, I know, but a V8 diesel sounds like absolute garbage. That ungodly popping/raspy sound they make when pushed hard makes me want to stab my ear drums with a screwdriver.

Now a straight-6 is where the good music is!
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:10 PM.