When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Did anyone hear the interview on the radio yesterday between Hannity and the chick that posed for November on the Babes against Bush Calendar.
What a moron that chick came across to be. I think she is the perfect example of the half arsed approach that people take towards politics.
She could not defend one single reason to not vote for Bush. Dont get me wrong I can think of a few reasons to not vote for him myself but he sure beats the heck outta any of the other choices.
Originally posted by haulingboat Did anyone hear the interview on the radio yesterday between Hannity and the chick that posed for November on the Babes against Bush Calendar.
What a moron that chick came across to be. I think she is the perfect example of the half arsed approach that people take towards politics.
She could not defend one single reason to not vote for Bush. Dont get me wrong I can think of a few reasons to not vote for him myself but he sure beats the heck outta any of the other choices.
What do you think?
I think that Hannity intentionally picked the most uninformed, ignorant non-starter he could find to represent the anti-Bush position. Beats getting sucked into debating actual issues with a formidable opponent.
Originally posted by mattsf250 like against bush how??
by not having a bush herself ???
against all women having bushes??
or, is this a president thing??
Thats a good one. It reminds me of one time on the news there were some pro-abortion protesters (back when George Bush senior was pres. ) One had a sign that read "George stay out of my Bush!). My younger son thought it was funny....he thought they were talking about a bush that grows in the yard.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by billsco I just surfed over to the Drudge Report and the big headlines read, "Hillary Rips Bush" and I thought................. [/QUOTE..........Whats new
Originally posted by zonkola I think that Hannity intentionally picked the most uninformed, ignorant non-starter he could find to represent the anti-Bush position. Beats getting sucked into debating actual issues with a formidable opponent.
C'mon, Zonkola. Are you saying Sean Hannity is uninformed himself? Or that he was looking for some easy opponent to score a few points? I have always enjoyed Hannity's show. These women were trying to make a name for themselves and the liberal Hollywood stereo-typical actor was the easiest way for them to get some face time- or should I say "Bush- Time?"
Originally posted by billsco
I just surfed over to the Drudge Report and the big headlines read, "Hillary Rips Bush" and I thought................. ..........Whats new
Originally posted by zonkola I think that Hannity intentionally picked the most uninformed, ignorant non-starter he could find to represent the anti-Bush position. Beats getting sucked into debating actual issues with a formidable opponent.
I'm sure you wrote this without thinking. Hannity has more opposition people on his show than anyone on radio or TV. He didn't pick the person that was to represent Babes against Bush.
One time he even offered to pay $5000 of his own money to Ted Kennedy's favorite charity if he would come on the show. Ted refused. Both he and Rush put people with opposite views at the top of the call list.
I went to the web site. Their 99 reasons why Bush sucks was very informative. They had to work hard to come up with 99 and many are a complete joke.
Even duplicating this one. (Also, which is it 6am or 7am if either)
74. Thanksgiving visit forced soldiers to eat turkey "dinner" at 7:00 am local time.
99. Forced troops in Baghdad to eat Thanksgiving "dinner" at 6:00 a.m.
55. Tony Blair/George Dubya: best pals.
I think they forgot that Blair is generally left of center.