When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Originally posted by stu37d C'mon, Zonkola. Are you saying Sean Hannity is uninformed himself? Or that he was looking for some easy opponent to score a few points? I have always enjoyed Hannity's show. These women were trying to make a name for themselves and the liberal Hollywood stereo-typical actor was the easiest way for them to get some face time- or should I say "Bush- Time?"
#2: That he was looking for an easy opponent to score points (and likely higher ratings by adding a little T&A). I mean, look at Colmes...Is he really a formidable opponent?
Originally posted by zonkola #2: That he was looking for an easy opponent to score points (and likely higher ratings by adding a little T&A). I mean, look at Colmes...Is he really a formidable opponent?
I've been saying that for years! Colmes is nothing but a set-up man for Hannity.
But let's throw a little conspiracy theory into the mix: maybe the republicans thought that they could win a few votes by putting some dumb bimbos on TV trying to souond intelligent and bashing the pres...??? A little reverse psychology, maybe?
Originally posted by stu37d I've been saying that for years! Colmes is nothing but a set-up man for Hannity.
But let's throw a little conspiracy theory into the mix: maybe the republicans thought that they could win a few votes by putting some dumb bimbos on TV trying to souond intelligent and bashing the pres...??? A little reverse psychology, maybe?
Making the opposition look silly certainly doesn't hurt.
I didn't see this episode myself--did the "babe" in question bring up the civil liberty implications of Patriot Act, or the Bush administration's neo-conservative agenda and it's potential impact on foreign policy and world sentiment towards the United States? I'm guessing not.
To be honest with you, I didn't see it, either. I did read the transcripts, though, and the woman was asked by Sean who the VP was and she didn't know!!! Of course, the other guest attacked him (Hannity) for asking such "unprepared" questions, so I am left to form my own opinion as to the relevency of such a movement.
Originally posted by stu37d C'mon, Zonkola. Are you saying Sean Hannity is uninformed himself? Or that he was looking for some easy opponent to score a few points? I have always enjoyed Hannity's show. These women were trying to make a name for themselves and the liberal Hollywood stereo-typical actor was the easiest way for them to get some face time- or should I say "Bush- Time?"
I'd put Hannity up against just about anyone the Left has. I've seen him go toe-to-toe with Charles Rangel a while back over Rangel's comment about the US bombing women and kids in Iraq. The man was like a bulldog on Rangel's leg; he couldn't be shaken off.
The woman was a complete idiot as far as political issues go. Hannity asked her why she was against Bush. She kept spuing some rehearst politicle activism line and dodging the question. When he asked her who the VP of the USA was she could not answer and hang up on him.
The problem is that some uninformed dude is going to buy the calander because of the T&A and when it comes time to vote he'll go vote against Bush because of the calander without knowing any of the issues.
Originally posted by stu37d To be honest with you, I didn't see it, either. I did read the transcripts, though, and the woman was asked by Sean who the VP was and she didn't know!!! Of course, the other guest attacked him (Hannity) for asking such "unprepared" questions, so I am left to form my own opinion as to the relevency of such a movement.
I don't see how a question like that is unprepared. if you are above the age of 12 you should know who the VP is. I was 6 years old and I knew who Reagan's VP was. Obviously, this chick had no place in discussing politics. She figures her ***** will do the talking for her. Sorry but they aren't that much of a diversion from the topic at hand.
I think the "Babes Against Bush" are just upset they have to pose of a calendar to earn a living instead of earning a quick $20 servicing his predecessor. No wonder the dems are complaining about the job losses...Clinton must have employed thousands, maybe millions!
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.