Notices
6.7L Power Stroke Diesel 2011-current Ford Powerstroke 6.7 L turbo diesel engine
View Poll Results: It is worth deleting, or keeping the warranties
Worth It
18.00%
Not worth it
42.00%
wait until warranties are gone
40.00%
Voters: 50. You may not vote on this poll

2024 6.7 delete

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 27, 2025 | 08:03 AM
  #16  
Walleye Hunter's Avatar
Walleye Hunter
Hotshot
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 10,750
Likes: 1,065
From: Douglassville, PA
Originally Posted by Strider250
No, the EPA did not go rogue on owners. Section 203(a)(3)(B) of the Clean Air Act makes it a violation for any person to manufacture or sell, or offer to sell, or install, any part or component (i.e., “defeat device”) intended for use with, or as part of, any motor vehicle or motor vehicle engine, where a principal effect of the part or component is to bypass, defeat, or render inoperative any device or element of design installed on or in a motor vehicle or motor vehicle engine in compliance with regulations under Title II of the Clean Air Act, and where the person knows or should know that such part or component is being offered for sale or installed for such use or put to such use.
Also, section 203(a)(3)(A) of the Clean Air Act prohibits any person from knowingly removing or rendering inoperative (i.e., “tampering”) any such emissions control device or element of design.

Violation of the tampering and defeat device prohibitions of the Clean Air Act may result in civil penalties. As of January 13, 2020, a person may be liable for a maximum civil penalty of $4,819 per defeat device manufactured, sold, or installed, or per vehicle tampered. A dealer or vehicle manufacturer who tampers with a vehicle may be subject to significantly higher civil penalties. Clean Air Act section 205(a); 40 C.F.R. §19.4.
So, is this a one time fine? Kind of like a cost of doing business (if you're rich)? In Upstate, NY, it's something like a $10,000 fine per tree that's removed from along a lake and people with million dollar homes who like lake views just do the deed and pay the fines.
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2025 | 09:18 AM
  #17  
Maxium4x4's Avatar
Maxium4x4
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 21,113
Likes: 3,939
From: Ohio
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Strider250
No, the EPA did not go rogue on owners. Section 203(a)(3)(B) of the Clean Air Act makes it a violation for any person to manufacture or sell, or offer to sell, or install, any part or component (i.e., “defeat device”) intended for use with, or as part of, any motor vehicle or motor vehicle engine, where a principal effect of the part or component is to bypass, defeat, or render inoperative any device or element of design installed on or in a motor vehicle or motor vehicle engine in compliance with regulations under Title II of the Clean Air Act, and where the person knows or should know that such part or component is being offered for sale or installed for such use or put to such use.
Also, section 203(a)(3)(A) of the Clean Air Act prohibits any person from knowingly removing or rendering inoperative (i.e., “tampering”) any such emissions control device or element of design.

Violation of the tampering and defeat device prohibitions of the Clean Air Act may result in civil penalties. As of January 13, 2020, a person may be liable for a maximum civil penalty of $4,819 per defeat device manufactured, sold, or installed, or per vehicle tampered. A dealer or vehicle manufacturer who tampers with a vehicle may be subject to significantly higher civil penalties. Clean Air Act section 205(a); 40 C.F.R. §19.4.
Senate held hearings on the EPA overstepping the bounds of The Clean Air act in their enforcement of considering it illegal.
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2025 | 11:24 AM
  #18  
tradosaurus's Avatar
tradosaurus
Laughing Gas
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 769
Likes: 156
Originally Posted by Strider250
No, the EPA did not go rogue on owners. Section 203(a)(3)(B) of the Clean Air Act makes it a violation for any person to manufacture or sell, or offer to sell, or install, any part or component (i.e., “defeat device”) intended for use with, or as part of, any motor vehicle or motor vehicle engine, where a principal effect of the part or component is to bypass, defeat, or render inoperative any device or element of design installed on or in a motor vehicle or motor vehicle engine in compliance with regulations under Title II of the Clean Air Act, and where the person knows or should know that such part or component is being offered for sale or installed for such use or put to such use.
Also, section 203(a)(3)(A) of the Clean Air Act prohibits any person from knowingly removing or rendering inoperative (i.e., “tampering”) any such emissions control device or element of design.

Violation of the tampering and defeat device prohibitions of the Clean Air Act may result in civil penalties. As of January 13, 2020, a person may be liable for a maximum civil penalty of $4,819 per defeat device manufactured, sold, or installed, or per vehicle tampered. A dealer or vehicle manufacturer who tampers with a vehicle may be subject to significantly higher civil penalties. Clean Air Act section 205(a); 40 C.F.R. §19.4.
The hypocrisy of the EPA when it comes to military or government vehicles.
I would rather see the enforcement of muffler laws that each state has on the books. Noise pollution is far worse than someone deleting the wasteful emission equipment on their diesel truck.
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2025 | 12:26 PM
  #19  
FishOnOne's Avatar
FishOnOne
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,937
Likes: 2,651
From: The Great State of Texas
Originally Posted by Maxium4x4
Senate held hearings on the EPA overstepping the bounds of The Clean Air act in their enforcement of considering it illegal.
Therefore the EPA went rogue...
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2025 | 12:53 PM
  #20  
pkarhoff's Avatar
pkarhoff
Trojan Pig
5 Year Member
Liked
Top Answer: 1
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 133
Likes: 88
From: Southern Arizona
Club FTE Gold Member
To each their own on this topic but my two cents are that with the current 23+ it really isn't worth it. Going to the 9th injector removes the wear on the engine from the horrid old way of increasing the EGTs. The new DPF/SCR setup is pretty solid and makes it way less annoying to sit behind my vehicle in traffic. The power part is, for all arguments sake, a non-issue as these trucks have plenty of power and that power is not reduced to a noticeable extent like it was prior to 23 MY. Also, the EGR has been severely reduced in its usage, although, if I could get rid of the EGR completely and leave everything else I certainly would. EGRs on an oil burner is flat out moronic.

That said, my 17 PS F250 did go on the diet, I did it myself, it was easy and I did enjoy the higher HP tunes. However, I didn't notice any better mileage and the smell of the exhaust behind my truck was God-awful. When I got my 21, I didn't bother to put it on a diet and now with my 24, I wouldn't even consider it at this point. The only argument for doing such, in my opinion, might be a slightly longer life of the engine. But, I would submit that 98% of us don't keep a truck past 250,000 miles which these things can easily do whole. The only caveat to this is that with the absurd prices Ford, GM and Ram are trying to offer these things at, you might see people start to keep them longer.
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2025 | 01:14 PM
  #21  
acdii's Avatar
acdii
Lead Driver
Photoriffic
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
Joined: Feb 2022
Posts: 7,968
Likes: 4,043
Originally Posted by pkarhoff
To each their own on this topic but my two cents are that with the current 23+ it really isn't worth it. Going to the 9th injector removes the wear on the engine from the horrid old way of increasing the EGTs. The new DPF/SCR setup is pretty solid and makes it way less annoying to sit behind my vehicle in traffic. The power part is, for all arguments sake, a non-issue as these trucks have plenty of power and that power is not reduced to a noticeable extent like it was prior to 23 MY. Also, the EGR has been severely reduced in its usage, although, if I could get rid of the EGR completely and leave everything else I certainly would. EGRs on an oil burner is flat out moronic.

That said, my 17 PS F250 did go on the diet, I did it myself, it was easy and I did enjoy the higher HP tunes. However, I didn't notice any better mileage and the smell of the exhaust behind my truck was God-awful. When I got my 21, I didn't bother to put it on a diet and now with my 24, I wouldn't even consider it at this point. The only argument for doing such, in my opinion, might be a slightly longer life of the engine. But, I would submit that 98% of us don't keep a truck past 250,000 miles which these things can easily do whole. The only caveat to this is that with the absurd prices Ford, GM and Ram are trying to offer these things at, you might see people start to keep them longer.
I Second this. Regens are quick and don't impact fuel economy as much as prior years that took 30 miles to complete. It's just not worth it on the 23+ trucks.

Originally Posted by Walleye Hunter
So, is this a one time fine? Kind of like a cost of doing business (if you're rich)? In Upstate, NY, it's something like a $10,000 fine per tree that's removed from along a lake and people with million dollar homes who like lake views just do the deed and pay the fines.
One time and fix, or impound and destroy.
EGR delete $4819
DPF removed $4819
SCR removed $4819
DEF injector removed $4819
sensors removed $4819 EACH
programming changed $4819

Fines can go as high as $40,000 or more and you get one chance to return it all to stock, or it gets impounded and crushed.

Only takes one Karen to video you rolling coal to the EPA to lose it all. Even if you don't intend to roll coal, a hard acceleration can produce enough smoke to nail you with. Bragging that your state doesn't do checks will do you no good when Karen gets a whiff of your exhaust and waits for you to make that one mistake she can record.
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2025 | 02:27 PM
  #22  
Walleye Hunter's Avatar
Walleye Hunter
Hotshot
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 10,750
Likes: 1,065
From: Douglassville, PA
Originally Posted by acdii
I Second this. Regens are quick and don't impact fuel economy as much as prior years that took 30 miles to complete. It's just not worth it on the 23+ trucks.



One time and fix, or impound and destroy.
EGR delete $4819
DPF removed $4819
SCR removed $4819
DEF injector removed $4819
sensors removed $4819 EACH
programming changed $4819

Fines can go as high as $40,000 or more and you get one chance to return it all to stock, or it gets impounded and crushed.

Only takes one Karen to video you rolling coal to the EPA to lose it all. Even if you don't intend to roll coal, a hard acceleration can produce enough smoke to nail you with. Bragging that your state doesn't do checks will do you no good when Karen gets a whiff of your exhaust and waits for you to make that one mistake she can record.
Damn, I wonder how many of those have been divvied out.
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2025 | 04:21 PM
  #23  
Painted Horse's Avatar
Painted Horse
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 4,239
From: Kaysville Utah
Originally Posted by pkarhoff
The only caveat to this is that with the absurd prices Ford, GM and Ram are trying to offer these things at, you might see people start to keep them longer.
That's me. I've bought a new truck every 3 years since 1991. But when they hit $100,000 to buy a replacement., I think I'm going to run my 2023 to 300,000 miles and really consider if I need a truck at that point. My kids my be taking my keys away if I still have a Drivers License then.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-3

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-5

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-9

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
Old Jan 27, 2025 | 04:54 PM
  #24  
helifixer's Avatar
helifixer
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,250
Likes: 7,676
From: Chino Valley, Arizona
Originally Posted by Walleye Hunter
Damn, I wonder how many of those have been divvied out.
I am going to guess somewhere close to zero.
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2025 | 06:39 PM
  #25  
chadstickpoindexter's Avatar
chadstickpoindexter
Lead Driver
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 3
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 5,842
Likes: 3,464
From: Uh oh, CA
Originally Posted by pkarhoff
To each their own on this topic but my two cents are that with the current 23+ it really isn't worth it. Going to the 9th injector removes the wear on the engine from the horrid old way of increasing the EGTs. The new DPF/SCR setup is pretty solid and makes it way less annoying to sit behind my vehicle in traffic. The power part is, for all arguments sake, a non-issue as these trucks have plenty of power and that power is not reduced to a noticeable extent like it was prior to 23 MY. Also, the EGR has been severely reduced in its usage, although, if I could get rid of the EGR completely and leave everything else I certainly would. EGRs on an oil burner is flat out moronic.

That said, my 17 PS F250 did go on the diet, I did it myself, it was easy and I did enjoy the higher HP tunes. However, I didn't notice any better mileage and the smell of the exhaust behind my truck was God-awful. When I got my 21, I didn't bother to put it on a diet and now with my 24, I wouldn't even consider it at this point. The only argument for doing such, in my opinion, might be a slightly longer life of the engine. But, I would submit that 98% of us don't keep a truck past 250,000 miles which these things can easily do whole. The only caveat to this is that with the absurd prices Ford, GM and Ram are trying to offer these things at, you might see people start to keep them longer.
I do like that they added the 9th injector on the 23's+, however, it would be nice to get rid of the EGR on any of them, whether they have a 9th injector or not. Also, I'm not sure what you mean by "power is not reduced to a noticeable extent like it was prior to 23 MY". Years ago people deleted for more power, but that's been a long time now... the 6.7's hp & torque has been the same since 2020 (excluding the HO, which is only barely more) and even the 17-19's weren't that far behind. I figure the noticeable power reduction was a long time before the 23's rather than something that changed in 23.
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2025 | 07:03 PM
  #26  
Maxium4x4's Avatar
Maxium4x4
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 21,113
Likes: 3,939
From: Ohio
Club FTE Gold Member
Had to chuckle the other day when a guy said if it didn't come with an Ash Tray, I don't want it. We deal with decisions every year on purchases of vehicles, equipment and fuel quality that effect the farm. 2020 Freightliner. no way around it, has the urea tank, next big item will be the Combine. Hopefully we can get some clarifications for the future.
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2025 | 07:19 PM
  #27  
pkarhoff's Avatar
pkarhoff
Trojan Pig
5 Year Member
Liked
Top Answer: 1
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 133
Likes: 88
From: Southern Arizona
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by chadstickpoindexter
I do like that they added the 9th injector on the 23's+, however, it would be nice to get rid of the EGR on any of them, whether they have a 9th injector or not. Also, I'm not sure what you mean by "power is not reduced to a noticeable extent like it was prior to 23 MY". Years ago people deleted for more power, but that's been a long time now... the 6.7's hp & torque has been the same since 2020 (excluding the HO, which is only barely more) and even the 17-19's weren't that far behind. I figure the noticeable power reduction was a long time before the 23's rather than something that changed in 23.
In my 16, 17 and 21, while in an active regeneration the power reduction was very noticeable to me. Injecting fuel on the exhaust stroke is just not a good idea in my opinion. Although the 9th injector method is not without its own faults, overall, this is the best method until, if they ever do, a fully electric DPF regenerator.
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2025 | 07:22 PM
  #28  
pkarhoff's Avatar
pkarhoff
Trojan Pig
5 Year Member
Liked
Top Answer: 1
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 133
Likes: 88
From: Southern Arizona
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Painted Horse
That's me. I've bought a new truck every 3 years since 1991. But when they hit $100,000 to buy a replacement., I think I'm going to run my 2023 to 300,000 miles and really consider if I need a truck at that point. My kids my be taking my keys away if I still have a Drivers License then.
I am pretty similar to you in how often I have swapped pickups. However, with the 24 I have now, the sheer price and the gigantic dry fisting Ford has done to the Super Duty buyers by removing features, it will be a long time before I would even consider swapping.
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2025 | 10:26 PM
  #29  
Maxium4x4's Avatar
Maxium4x4
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 21,113
Likes: 3,939
From: Ohio
Club FTE Gold Member
A little more info, Federal Supremacy.
States like California and Pennsylvania ect who require emission testing lose Federal Funding for creating guidelines over the Federal laws. Your vehicle, your property, EPA is fourth branch of government which unconstitutionally fines owners since they are not an organization created by the Constitution.

Confusing Yes, wind of change by a new admiration. More work needed in my opinion.
 
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2025 | 04:33 AM
  #30  
Vics2024Platinum's Avatar
Vics2024Platinum
Cross-Country
Joined: Apr 2022
Posts: 96
Likes: 39
From: South Holland Ill
Originally Posted by chadstickpoindexter
I do like that they added the 9th injector on the 23's+, however, it would be nice to get rid of the EGR on any of them, whether they have a 9th injector or not. Also, I'm not sure what you mean by "power is not reduced to a noticeable extent like it was prior to 23 MY". Years ago people deleted for more power, but that's been a long time now... the 6.7's hp & torque has been the same since 2020 (excluding the HO, which is only barely more) and even the 17-19's weren't that far behind. I figure the noticeable power reduction was a long time before the 23's rather than something that changed in 23.
I agree with you I would really like to get rid of the EGR because its very destructive to the engine,but with the 9th injector the rest of the emissions system is not an issue.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:26 PM.

story-0
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-2
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-4
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-5
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-6
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-8
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE