Notices
6.7L Power Stroke Diesel 2011-current Ford Powerstroke 6.7 L turbo diesel engine

CP4

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 18, 2024 | 08:50 AM
  #46  
speakerfritz's Avatar
speakerfritz
Hotshot
10 Year Member
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Liked
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 14,301
Likes: 2,197
Am i missing something

.002 % difference

 
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2024 | 01:18 PM
  #47  
jollyrogr's Avatar
jollyrogr
Cargo Master
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 2,277
Likes: 949
Originally Posted by acdii
There you go. Providing more volume requires less pressure. IOW I wouldn't worry if the pressure readings arent 1:1 with a CP4 since they are not !:! to each other
Except you want/need the required pressure. Higher pressures give better atomization through the nozzle and cleaner burn (more efficiency, more power).
 
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2024 | 01:33 PM
  #48  
JoeUser's Avatar
JoeUser
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Oct 2022
Posts: 1,823
Likes: 898
From: Dallas Metroplex
Originally Posted by jollyrogr
Except you want/need the required pressure. Higher pressures give better atomization through the nozzle and cleaner burn (more efficiency, more power).
I'm not a fuel injection specialist (and haven't stayed at a Holiday Inn Express lately), but unless I completely misunderstand I would think that if the pump provides whatever pressure the ECU commands/requests, then it's delivering optimal pressure, correct?

Not trying to stir any pots...
 
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2024 | 04:45 PM
  #49  
scottu5's Avatar
scottu5
Cross-Country
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 52
Likes: 46
From: SC
Just to add some more info on DCR;
2014 F350, CCLWB, SRW, 138k.

I completed the DCR conversion about 14 months and 11,000 miles ago. Took me approx 12 hours. DCR kit and fuel lines fit perfectly (not one ounce of pressure to get them to line up). I was completely surprised at the quality of the product, including the packing container.

Truck was stock at the time and now is lightened and I run a 0 HP tune, no transmission tune. Some moderate towing (10,000 lbs). About 2000 lbs in the bed at all times. There was no difference in DCR / truck performance before or after.

From the day of completion till today, truck has run normally, with a possibly slightly different sound? Truck starts 'quicker' hot or cold. (With CP4, when hot, starts were longer). I had a slight ticking when cold which went away with DCR and has not returned. At completion of installation, primed 7 times and started right up.

Reference the discussion about cmd and actual rail pressures, I monitor with EZLynk and they are solid, not a lot of movement (on highway, steady throttle). Actual is ahead (.1) or identical to command.

scott
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2024 | 12:21 PM
  #50  
acdii's Avatar
acdii
Lead Driver
Photoriffic
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
Joined: Feb 2022
Posts: 7,984
Likes: 4,058
Originally Posted by jollyrogr
Except you want/need the required pressure. Higher pressures give better atomization through the nozzle and cleaner burn (more efficiency, more power).
There is more than atomization, there is volume as well. You want both. If you have higher volume than required at CP4 pressures, then more fuel will be delivered than needed. Think 3" firehose to 1" garden hose, you can get similar volume from both when one is flowing at 1 PSI and the other at 100 PSI.

Originally Posted by JoeUser
I'm not a fuel injection specialist (and haven't stayed at a Holiday Inn Express lately), but unless I completely misunderstand I would think that if the pump provides whatever pressure the ECU commands/requests, then it's delivering optimal pressure, correct?

Not trying to stir any pots...
No, you got it right. It measures flow and pressure. More flow equals more volume requiring less pressure.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MC_Greenmachine
2015 + Expedition & Navigator
2
Jul 10, 2015 04:45 AM
theleetbeagle
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
2
Oct 24, 2001 08:56 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:50 AM.

story-0
10 Ways Ford is LOSING to the Competition

Slideshow: 10 ways Ford is losing to the competition

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-15 09:52:01


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 6 Best Deals Available on New Fords & Lincolns Right Now

Some great targets in today's expensive world.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-15 09:35:19


VIEW MORE
story-2
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-12 11:01:55


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

Slideshow: Top 10 Fords at 2026 Ford Nationals

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-09 11:10:08


VIEW MORE
story-4
3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

Based on years of owning multiple modern Ford products.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-09 10:53:36


VIEW MORE
story-5
10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

SPONSORED: From muddy boots to rain-soaked cargo, these upgrades address some of the most common frustrations Ford truck owners face every day.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-06-08 18:50:34


VIEW MORE
story-6
Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

Here's everything you need to know about every Ford engine available for the 2026 model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-05 12:58:01


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-9
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE