Notices
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Fat Fendered and Classic Ford Trucks

Master cylinder conversion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 18, 2024 | 09:58 AM
  #1  
bobscogin's Avatar
bobscogin
Thread Starter
|
Cross-Country
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 91
Likes: 44
Master cylinder conversion

I'm converting the original master cylinder on my '53 F100 to a late 60's Mustang dual reservoir drum/drum type using an adapter bracket. I'm keeping the original drums for now, so not using a proportioning valve. This seems to be a popular conversion, so I'm hoping members can answer a question. Which port on the master cylinder goes to which pair of brakes, or does it matter? Thanks for sharing your experience --
 
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2024 | 10:21 AM
  #2  
bmoran4's Avatar
bmoran4
Parts Nerd Extraordinaire
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,353
Likes: 1,775
From: Western NY
Club FTE Gold Member
That era mustang had a few different master cylinder setups with various permutations of powered/manual and disc/drum... it would probably help to know which exact master cylinder you are going with.
 
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2024 | 10:23 AM
  #3  
lshort's Avatar
lshort
Laughing Gas
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 948
Likes: 342
From: Newton Illinois
I do not think that it will matter but I would use the side with the larger reservoir for the front, if you switch to front disk you will then be set, make sure and use 10PSI residual pressure valves on both sides.
One problem with not running a proportioning valve at all is that if you loose a brake line you will lose brakes to all 4 wheels despite the dual master cylinder.

 
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2024 | 10:27 AM
  #4  
52 Merc's Avatar
52 Merc
Hotshot
15 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 3
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 16,168
Likes: 4,767
From: Burbank, WA
Originally the rear reservoir, or the one closest to the firewall and pedal, was for front brakes, and vice-versa. If you're mounting it in the stock location under the floor, you'll be turned around backwards, so the one closest to the pedal will now be forward and should go to the front brakes. Does that make sense?
 
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2024 | 11:49 AM
  #5  
bobscogin's Avatar
bobscogin
Thread Starter
|
Cross-Country
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 91
Likes: 44
Originally Posted by lshort
I do not think that it will matter but I would use the side with the larger reservoir for the front, if you switch to front disk you will then be set, make sure and use 10PSI residual pressure valves on both sides.
One problem with not running a proportioning valve at all is that if you loose a brake line you will lose brakes to all 4 wheels despite the dual master cylinder.
Thanks. Since it's a master cylinder for an all drum system, both reservoirs are the same size. I'm confused over the need for a proportioning valve. The stock Mustang 4 wheel drum system didn't use one. It did have a differential pressure valve that grounded the brake warning light circuit if there was a failure. I was under the impression that the front and rear were isolated from each other within the master cylinder, but I'll look into that.
 
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2024 | 11:57 AM
  #6  
bobscogin's Avatar
bobscogin
Thread Starter
|
Cross-Country
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 91
Likes: 44
Originally Posted by bmoran4
That era mustang had a few different master cylinder setups with various permutations of powered/manual and disc/drum... it would probably help to know which exact master cylinder you are going with.
The Mustang master cylinder is a 1" bore, dual reservoir, for an all drum system. Both reservoirs are the same size as they should be. I'm not adding a booster. I'm aware of the need for residual pressure valves, and this master cylinder has them built in, so I shouldn't have to use the in-line type. Thanks for your reply!
 
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2024 | 12:03 PM
  #7  
lshort's Avatar
lshort
Laughing Gas
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 948
Likes: 342
From: Newton Illinois
Originally Posted by bobscogin
Thanks. Since it's a master cylinder for an all drum system, both reservoirs are the same size. I'm confused over the need for a proportioning valve. The stock Mustang 4 wheel drum system didn't use one. It did have a differential pressure valve that grounded the brake warning light circuit if there was a failure. I was under the impression that the front and rear were isolated from each other within the master cylinder, but I'll look into that.
That valve that operates the brake warning light also has a valve that shuts off the fluid to the side that lost pressure and sets the light off at the same time
 
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2024 | 12:35 PM
  #8  
EffieTrucker's Avatar
EffieTrucker
Phantom of the Phorum
15 Year Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 5,472
Likes: 1,696
From: Kentucky
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by 52 Merc
Originally the rear reservoir, or the one closest to the firewall and pedal, was for front brakes, and vice-versa. If you're mounting it in the stock location under the floor, you'll be turned around backwards, so the one closest to the pedal will now be forward and should go to the front brakes. Does that make sense?
This is how mine is plumbed. I had it backwards at first (in my mind the "front" port should be for the front brakes) and my brakes were mediocre. Once I flipped them so the closest to pedal went to the front I have solid brakes. I have noted this change in my build tread. My brake light switch is plumbed with the rear brake line.

My MC is for a 1968 Mustang, 4-wheel drum, no booster. Duralast #NM1485. My understanding is they have residual-valves built-in from the factory.

It actually fits a slew of Fords:


Mustangs:
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-2

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-4

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-5

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-8

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Jul 18, 2024 | 05:29 PM
  #9  
bobscogin's Avatar
bobscogin
Thread Starter
|
Cross-Country
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 91
Likes: 44
I found this video to be helpful in understanding how the master cylinder effectively isolates one chamber from the other when either one fails. The isolation takes place by closing compensating ports in the master cylinder and is independent of proportioning or pressure differential valves in the system. I think I would want the primary piston, which builds pressure first to activate the brake light switch and go to the front wheels
 
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2024 | 06:00 PM
  #10  
lshort's Avatar
lshort
Laughing Gas
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 948
Likes: 342
From: Newton Illinois
sounds like you have it figured out
 
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2024 | 06:51 PM
  #11  
bobscogin's Avatar
bobscogin
Thread Starter
|
Cross-Country
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 91
Likes: 44
Originally Posted by lshort
sounds like you have it figured out
I'm not the sharpest knife in the drawer, but I think I'm starting to understand it.
 
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2024 | 07:17 PM
  #12  
52 Merc's Avatar
52 Merc
Hotshot
15 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 3
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 16,168
Likes: 4,767
From: Burbank, WA
As long as you have the ability to sharpen the blade from time to time, you'll be ok.
 
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2024 | 09:31 PM
  #13  
bobscogin's Avatar
bobscogin
Thread Starter
|
Cross-Country
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 91
Likes: 44
Originally Posted by EffieTrucker
My MC is for a 1968 Mustang, 4-wheel drum, no booster. Duralast #NM1485. My understanding is they have residual-valves built-in from the factory.
That's the master cylinder I'm using, and I can confirm that it has residual pressure valves built in.
 
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2024 | 08:24 AM
  #14  
Steve's Avatar
Steve
More Turbo
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 687
Likes: 80
To all of you that have done this conversion but retained drum brakes: Did you find any difference in braking/pedal effort? My brakes are stock and in good condition, but pedal effort has always been high.
 
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2024 | 09:42 AM
  #15  
bobscogin's Avatar
bobscogin
Thread Starter
|
Cross-Country
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 91
Likes: 44
Originally Posted by Steve
To all of you that have done this conversion but retained drum brakes: Did you find any difference in braking/pedal effort? My brakes are stock and in good condition, but pedal effort has always been high.
The stock master cylinder is 1.0625", while the Mustang cylinder is 1.000". In theory, this would result in requiring more pedal travel for the same amount of fluid displaced. That's the downside. The upside is, for equal pedal pressure on both master cylinder bores, I get higher hydraulic pressure with the 1.000" bore. This means less pedal pressure required for the same stopping force at the expense of a bit more travel. The difference in piston areas is about 11%, so the increased travel is probably not noticeable in a well bled and adjusted system.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:15 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-1
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-3
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-4
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-5
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-7
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE