When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I'm converting the original master cylinder on my '53 F100 to a late 60's Mustang dual reservoir drum/drum type using an adapter bracket. I'm keeping the original drums for now, so not using a proportioning valve. This seems to be a popular conversion, so I'm hoping members can answer a question. Which port on the master cylinder goes to which pair of brakes, or does it matter? Thanks for sharing your experience --
That era mustang had a few different master cylinder setups with various permutations of powered/manual and disc/drum... it would probably help to know which exact master cylinder you are going with.
I do not think that it will matter but I would use the side with the larger reservoir for the front, if you switch to front disk you will then be set, make sure and use 10PSI residual pressure valves on both sides.
One problem with not running a proportioning valve at all is that if you loose a brake line you will lose brakes to all 4 wheels despite the dual master cylinder.
Originally the rear reservoir, or the one closest to the firewall and pedal, was for front brakes, and vice-versa. If you're mounting it in the stock location under the floor, you'll be turned around backwards, so the one closest to the pedal will now be forward and should go to the front brakes. Does that make sense?
I do not think that it will matter but I would use the side with the larger reservoir for the front, if you switch to front disk you will then be set, make sure and use 10PSI residual pressure valves on both sides.
One problem with not running a proportioning valve at all is that if you loose a brake line you will lose brakes to all 4 wheels despite the dual master cylinder.
Thanks. Since it's a master cylinder for an all drum system, both reservoirs are the same size. I'm confused over the need for a proportioning valve. The stock Mustang 4 wheel drum system didn't use one. It did have a differential pressure valve that grounded the brake warning light circuit if there was a failure. I was under the impression that the front and rear were isolated from each other within the master cylinder, but I'll look into that.
That era mustang had a few different master cylinder setups with various permutations of powered/manual and disc/drum... it would probably help to know which exact master cylinder you are going with.
The Mustang master cylinder is a 1" bore, dual reservoir, for an all drum system. Both reservoirs are the same size as they should be. I'm not adding a booster. I'm aware of the need for residual pressure valves, and this master cylinder has them built in, so I shouldn't have to use the in-line type. Thanks for your reply!
Thanks. Since it's a master cylinder for an all drum system, both reservoirs are the same size. I'm confused over the need for a proportioning valve. The stock Mustang 4 wheel drum system didn't use one. It did have a differential pressure valve that grounded the brake warning light circuit if there was a failure. I was under the impression that the front and rear were isolated from each other within the master cylinder, but I'll look into that.
That valve that operates the brake warning light also has a valve that shuts off the fluid to the side that lost pressure and sets the light off at the same time
Originally the rear reservoir, or the one closest to the firewall and pedal, was for front brakes, and vice-versa. If you're mounting it in the stock location under the floor, you'll be turned around backwards, so the one closest to the pedal will now be forward and should go to the front brakes. Does that make sense?
This is how mine is plumbed. I had it backwards at first (in my mind the "front" port should be for the front brakes) and my brakes were mediocre. Once I flipped them so the closest to pedal went to the front I have solid brakes. I have noted this change in my build tread. My brake light switch is plumbed with the rear brake line.
My MC is for a 1968 Mustang, 4-wheel drum, no booster. Duralast #NM1485. My understanding is they have residual-valves built-in from the factory.
I found this video to be helpful in understanding how the master cylinder effectively isolates one chamber from the other when either one fails. The isolation takes place by closing compensating ports in the master cylinder and is independent of proportioning or pressure differential valves in the system. I think I would want the primary piston, which builds pressure first to activate the brake light switch and go to the front wheels
To all of you that have done this conversion but retained drum brakes: Did you find any difference in braking/pedal effort? My brakes are stock and in good condition, but pedal effort has always been high.
To all of you that have done this conversion but retained drum brakes: Did you find any difference in braking/pedal effort? My brakes are stock and in good condition, but pedal effort has always been high.
The stock master cylinder is 1.0625", while the Mustang cylinder is 1.000". In theory, this would result in requiring more pedal travel for the same amount of fluid displaced. That's the downside. The upside is, for equal pedal pressure on both master cylinder bores, I get higher hydraulic pressure with the 1.000" bore. This means less pedal pressure required for the same stopping force at the expense of a bit more travel. The difference in piston areas is about 11%, so the increased travel is probably not noticeable in a well bled and adjusted system.