When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
My ‘24 F350 DRW S/C 4x4 6.7 with 4:10’s averages about 14.5 without a trailer. The trailer most commonly behind it runs around 23,500 loaded and 14k unloaded, I average around 6 loaded, and 7.5 unloaded.
2017 F350 DRW C/C 4x4 6.7 with 4:10’s is typically about .5 MPG better with the same trailer. Both trucks have a trailer behind them 90%+ of the time.
Can someone explain to me why pickups get such terrible fuel mileage? My brother drives an 18-wheeler, mostly not fully loaded (I think he said typical total weight is 60-70,000 for his type of loads) and he averages 8+ MPG.
Can someone explain to me why pickups get such terrible fuel mileage? My brother drives an 18-wheeler, mostly not fully loaded (I think he said typical total weight is 60-70,000 for his type of loads) and he averages 8+ MPG.
Because the programing/shift points of the 10 speed isn't doing what the 18-wheelers driver is doing, (shifting all the time)... Keeping the RPMs in the sweet spot for power and economy... Probably because people would complain about it, something is wrong, this 10 speed never stays in any particular gear, always up, down, hunting for a gear unlike my 6 speed... Thus loosing the possible advantage of the 10 speed to get more usable power and better MPG... JMO
Can someone explain to me why pickups get such terrible fuel mileage? My brother drives an 18-wheeler, mostly not fully loaded (I think he said typical total weight is 60-70,000 for his type of loads) and he averages 8+ MPG.
1. His final drive ratio is something like 5.xx:1 if it's tall, some IIRC are in the 6-7 range, so it's built to pull.
2. He also likely doesn't stop much, and once it's moving it doesn't take much to keep it going.
3. Plus it's a diesel.
4. Aerodynamics and being a fifth-wheel style connection. Most rigs today, especially company-owned trucks, have the tall air dam now to push the air up over the trailer, and the trailer is close enough to the cab (usually) that the drag is minimized. There are other things that can be done as well, including the big blocking panels that keep wind out from under the trailer.
Pickups are designed to get better mileage when empty, because that's all EPA standards regulate. Semis are held to different standards that apply when a trailer is attached.
1. His final drive ratio is something like 5.xx:1 if it's tall, some IIRC are in the 6-7 range, so it's built to pull.
2. He also likely doesn't stop much, and once it's moving it doesn't take much to keep it going.
3. Plus it's a diesel.
4. Aerodynamics and being a fifth-wheel style connection. Most rigs today, especially company-owned trucks, have the tall air dam now to push the air up over the trailer, and the trailer is close enough to the cab (usually) that the drag is minimized. There are other things that can be done as well, including the big blocking panels that keep wind out from under the trailer.
Pickups are designed to get better mileage when empty, because that's all EPA standards regulate. Semis are held to different standards that apply when a trailer is attached.
Your points are certainly part of the "problem" with FORD Co. thinking.... Who cares, meaning they don't, err, meaning the customer doesn't seem to care... about MPG, People seem to care more about 0 to 60 get up and go, so... here we are, lots of get up and go, but not much gain with the 10 speed as it "could have ben had, done properly"... JMO... again... I actually went from 8.9 MPG, to 11.3 MPG, hauling my slide in camper and boat, on top of it with my 10 speed... with the things I did on my own to improve MPG & performance... and... It didn't involve slowing down... a HUGE improvement... IMO... so why couldn't/didn't FORD Co. do the same thing...???
They don't care... Why...??? because...
The customer doesn't seem to care... They (the customer) seems to think it's "just the way it is"... You are driving a Heavy duty truck, err, nay, make that a Super duty truck,Nothing to be done about it, it's just the way it is...
OTR trucks are built with one purpose in mind so everything is optimized for that task. SDs are designed to be the jack of all trades including commuting, off roading, family shuttling etc, and compromises are inevitable.
Back in the day when 2wd trucks had different frames from 4wd trucks, the 2wd ones would sit much closer to the ground and get significantly better mileage. Even today the 2wd SDs get noticeably better mpg than their 4wd counter parts even though they share the same frame and only a few inches difference in ride height.
OTR trucks are built with one purpose in mind so everything is optimized for that task. SDs are designed to be the jack of all trades including commuting, off roading, family shuttling etc, and compromises are inevitable.
Back in the day when 2wd trucks had different frames from 4wd trucks, the 2wd ones would sit much closer to the ground and get significantly better mileage. Even today the 2wd SDs get noticeably better mpg than their 4wd counter parts even though they share the same frame and only a few inches difference in ride height.
Of course there always be "compromises"... But, how come I, could make my truck perform better & get better MPG... Doing the same job with the same driver, with the same truck that FORD Co. sold me...??? Well... Because FORD Co. built a truck to satisfy the masses, and lowered the bar as to what actually "can" be done with this same truck, that I have, Yes, It cost me a $1,000+ to make my truck do what it can now do, but it would only have cost FORD Co. a $100 (probably less), to do the same thing... So... Why didn't they do it...??? Better performance, (20 HP 1,000 RPMs earlier) higher MPG (2.4 MPG more), Shifting points that just work better, for a Miserly $100... come on, it's a no brainer, IMO...
I used to be a heavy truck mechanic. Depending on what's under the hood, some of them turn 900 - 1100 rpm at full throttle (probably governed). Owner operators don't just care about MPG or power, they care about total cost of ownership. (many used to swear by the Volvo trucks as being the cheapest to run, I don't know if it's still that way).
Do I think that pickups can be made to be far more fuel efficient than they currently are? Absolutely. Even my 98.5 Dodge 2500 Cummins gets about the same MPG as today's diesels, albeit without emissions stuff, and of course it has far less power. But with an adjustment of priorities, it should be possible to make more efficient modern pickups, and pickups with a much lower total cost of ownership for fleets. But comparing to big trucks is apples to oranges. As others have said, the purposes are different and that demands a different design. Putting an old mountain motor like a Cummins N14 in a modern pickup truck would be a sight to see, lol.
Coasting is your friend. Every time you apply the brake petal you are wasting energy. When you see a stop sign or red light up ahead lift your right foot and coast. It makes a huge difference.
Coasting is your friend. Every time you apply the brake petal you are wasting energy. When you see a stop sign or red light up ahead lift your right foot and coast. It makes a huge difference.
Good point. Especially when I'm towing I tend to coast a lot when possible. Thinking it'll help increase my brake pad/rotor service intervals as well.
Coasting is your friend. Every time you apply the brake petal you are wasting energy. When you see a stop sign or red light up ahead lift your right foot and coast. It makes a huge difference.
one thing that really helps me out a lot is sticking to the slow lane and coast up hill as much as I can without impeding traffic and if it is a long or steep incline, I find a tractor trailer to follow and allow the speed to drop gradually in a safe manner to 55 or even lower when needed if I have to be on the throttle. If I am towing 12k+ behind me and I am in the slow lane already, and the road is steep and/or twisty, well I am going to go as fast as the condition allows and leave plenty of space ahead of me behind the semi I am following.
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level
Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.