When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
94 f-150 5.0 with MAF. Bought an Actron scanner and in the data list it is showing a MAF reading and a MAP which is stuck at 8.1 inHg. Is this non functioning MAP reading a problem, or should I just ignore? Currently hunting surging idle when warm (suspect ECM capacitors). Thanks
I don't think the MAF trucks have a separate MAP sensor.. that data is calculated from MAF readings, so are your MAF readings within the expected range?
I don't think the MAF trucks have a separate MAP sensor.. that data is calculated from MAF readings, so are your MAF readings within the expected range?
the MAF reading is changing, MAP is at 8.1 running or not. I don’t think there is an issue with the MAF reading, mostly just curious why there is a MAP reading.
Early MAF Mustangs had a MAF sensor and a BARO sensor. MAF trucks only had the MAF sensor.
A BARO sensor is a MAP sensor referenced to atmosphere not manifold vacuum.
Those folks using the A9* PCMs on a truck kept the MAP sensor, but removed the connection to the manifold. So now it became a BARO sensor. Again, factory MAF trucks do not have a MAP/BARO sensor.
Early MAF Mustangs had a MAF sensor and a BARO sensor. MAF trucks only had the MAF sensor.
A BARO sensor is a MAP sensor referenced to atmosphere not manifold vacuum.
Those folks using the A9* PCMs on a truck kept the MAP sensor, but removed the connection to the manifold. So now it became a BARO sensor. Again, factory MAF trucks do not have a MAP/BARO sensor.
ahhh, and the baro sensor was the same map sensor used in the SD vehicles, but had no tube attached? Correct?
Factory MAF calculates the manifold pressure at high throttle situations and, in my experience, periodically (NOT often) otherwise
Since it knows the air flow, the reading is unlikely to change enough ambiently to affect fueling that much I think is the reasoning for it being so casual. like you arent going from 0ft above sea level to 6000 between the time it takes to get an update from it lol,.
Thanks, so on my truck it is not relevant. I think the discussion above is on a particular year(s) of mustang, correct. I hope it did not calculate my reading of 8.1 inHg as that is about 3.9psi which would be nuts.