More intake crud
FTE Legend
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 31,833
Likes: 9,154
From: Western NY
Okay just got done watching this video. Anyone know how they put it in a new SCR section on the rocketship? I thought it was all one piece.
And thinking about this fritz, this problem was caused by the EGR injection into the intake. The problem was not caused by the CCV. But with that said, I still think it's not a bad idea to filter that crud out of the CCV reroute back into the engine with a catch can.
And thinking further, the new 20 6.7 engine uses less EGR (but more DEF) than our trucks, the 11 to 19s, do. So maybe that's why some go out way further than ours due to less sooty intake charge coming into the engine.
Just thinking out loud is all. Who knows?
And thinking about this fritz, this problem was caused by the EGR injection into the intake. The problem was not caused by the CCV. But with that said, I still think it's not a bad idea to filter that crud out of the CCV reroute back into the engine with a catch can.
And thinking further, the new 20 6.7 engine uses less EGR (but more DEF) than our trucks, the 11 to 19s, do. So maybe that's why some go out way further than ours due to less sooty intake charge coming into the engine.
Just thinking out loud is all. Who knows?
Lead Driver
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,923
Likes: 2,642
From: The Great State of Texas
Okay just got done watching this video. Anyone know how they put it in a new SCR section on the rocketship? I thought it was all one piece.
And thinking about this fritz, this problem was caused by the EGR injection into the intake. The problem was not caused by the CCV. But with that said, I still think it's not a bad idea to filter that crud out of the CCV reroute back into the engine with a catch can.
And thinking further, the new 20 6.7 engine uses less EGR (but more DEF) than our trucks, the 11 to 19s, do. So maybe that's why some go out way further than ours due to less sooty intake charge coming into the engine.
Just thinking out loud is all. Who knows?
And thinking about this fritz, this problem was caused by the EGR injection into the intake. The problem was not caused by the CCV. But with that said, I still think it's not a bad idea to filter that crud out of the CCV reroute back into the engine with a catch can.
And thinking further, the new 20 6.7 engine uses less EGR (but more DEF) than our trucks, the 11 to 19s, do. So maybe that's why some go out way further than ours due to less sooty intake charge coming into the engine.
Just thinking out loud is all. Who knows?
FTE Legend
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 31,833
Likes: 9,154
From: Western NY
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
|
Hotshot
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 14,256
Likes: 2,182
FTE Stories
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)
Brett Foote
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies
Joe Kucinski
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make
Brett Foote
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!
Michael S. Palmer
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home
Verdad Gallardo
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!
Joe Kucinski
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?
Brett Foote
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!
Michael S. Palmer
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!
Joe Kucinski
FTE Legend
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 31,833
Likes: 9,154
From: Western NY
Thread Starter
|
Hotshot
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 14,256
Likes: 2,182
I do like the idea posted earlier about moving the EGR bleed off to after the DPF....dont know if the temps would be adequate for all the emmissions magic.
FTE Legend
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 31,833
Likes: 9,154
From: Western NY
I wonder what the flow rate would have to be to steam clean those intake passages...and/or ideal placement of spray injectors. too much flow rate and you get too much cooling which when coupled with b5 fuels...could drop egt temps quite a bit. I wonder what the 6.7 world would look like if a spray injector was positioned in ideal crud prevention places.
I do like the idea posted earlier about moving the EGR bleed off to after the DPF....dont know if the temps would be adequate for all the emmissions magic.
I do like the idea posted earlier about moving the EGR bleed off to after the DPF....dont know if the temps would be adequate for all the emmissions magic.
I think Ford did something with the latest gen of 6.7s, MY 20 plus, by using less EGR and more DEF in their engine/exhaust emissions strategy.
Thinking about methanol injection, wouldn't that be a cool option from the factory for the guys who wanted it? Backed up by OEM research and development along with a factory warranty. Methanol injection has already been proven for performance gains since WW2 and does keep the intake/combustion chambers clean.
Ford is on top now when it comes to power but would go way over the top with methanol injection, could potentially keep the truck more emissions friendly, therefore make emissions equipment last longer. But there are those pesky bean counters.
5th Wheeling
Joined: Jun 2023
Posts: 25
Likes: 8
From: St. Louis MO
I have the SPE CCV reroute kit installed with internal cheese grater, extended the hose to the rear of the truck, but too do not like the little bit of "smoke" coming out at idle. Have a Mishimoto HF catch can on the way and I think I will put that on the frame behind the front tire and route back up into the intake. keeping the gases in, but the oil and crap out.
Cargo Master
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,009
Likes: 89
From: SE. MA
I cannot speak for DEF usage on anything prior to the 20 MY but I know when I went from MA to FL back in November I had a full tank of DEF when I left and I had to fill it when I arrived in FL 3 days later. I was towing my 5er , about 13k the whole time and I used roughly the same ammount of DEF on the return trip.