When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I have a 89 f150 4.9l. I am wondering do the ICM fail due to excessive heat? I live in South Carolina. Does anyone know what there temp rating is?
Thanks in advance.
The obvious answer is yes, anything can fail w/ enough heat. But with that said, the inside of your engine compartment is much much hotter than anything the weather can produce. Even in the hottest climates like AZ or Death Valley you aren't going to be running into that many more failures due to heat. NOW of course IF your radiator can't keep up that's a whole other story but most stuff under your hood can deal with temps well in excess of what mother nature creates. Heat cycles can also cause issues mechanically and electrically so on these older trucks, again yes they can cause problems.
The obvious answer is yes, anything can fail w/ enough heat. But with that said, the inside of your engine compartment is much much hotter than anything the weather can produce. Even in the hottest climates like AZ or Death Valley you aren't going to be running into that many more failures due to heat. NOW of course IF your radiator can't keep up that's a whole other story but most stuff under your hood can deal with temps well in excess of what mother nature creates. Heat cycles can also cause issues mechanically and electrically so on these older trucks, again yes they can cause problems.
What is it doing?
The answer is a very big YES. AFAIK your module is mounted on the distributor. The module is very prone to failing and in some cases very quickly. There was a major Class Action Lawsuit over this and Ford subsequently mounted the units remotely.
I installed a remote mounting kit - heat sink and harness - made by McCully Racing Motors on my '91 5.8. I installed a NOS Motorcraft ignition module.
Do some searches and you will find lots of posts regarding the issue. Here is a link to one example I started.
The answer is a very big YES. AFAIK your module is mounted on the distributor. The module is very prone to failing and in some cases very quickly.
I installed a remote mounting kit - heat sink and harness - made by McCully Racing Motors on my '91 5.8. I installed a NOS Motorcraft ignition module.
Between the ‘87 Bronco and the ‘89 F-150, I may have replaced one TFI module in over 300K miles of driving. The majority of that was the Bronco which I’ve owned since ‘96. On the Bronco I believe it was only replaced because the distributor was worn out and the dealer replaced it as an assembly.
Between the ‘87 Bronco and the ‘89 F-150, I may have replaced one TFI module in over 300K miles of driving. The majority of that was the Bronco which I’ve owned since ‘96. On the Bronco I believe it was only replaced because the distributor was worn out and the dealer replaced it as an assembly.
I replaced the original at 140k and I just replaced another one within 5k with a remote mount kit. When they go they go. It speaks volumes that at least 2 companies went to the trouble of making remote mounting kits and that Ford went to remote mounting also.
I have a 89 f150 4.9l. I am wondering do the ICM fail due to excessive heat? I live in South Carolina. Does anyone know what there temp rating is?
Thanks in advance.
I had an '84 Tempo that ate those modules like candy. So far my '87 F150 hasn't needed one in almost 30 years of ownership........BUT.......earlier this week I went to leave work. I cranked the truck, and within 5 seconds it quit, never to restart.
It was hot, so I called the local roll back to take it home. First time its ever left me sitting. It may be a fuel pump, as both the low and high pressure are original. I haven't tested anything yet since I have the Dodge to drive. Guess I'll try to do some research today to see if the problem is fuel or fire.
If fuel, I'm going to change both pumps, since the fuel gauge is messed up anyway. Been thinking about just putting in a new tank also. This truck sits a LOT, so who knows what the tank looks like inside.
Back to module, sorry for the hi-jack. It was hot the day my truck quit. With the Tempo, it would quit mostly at stop lights.
I had an '84 Tempo that ate those modules like candy. So far my '87 F150 hasn't needed one in almost 30 years of ownership........BUT.......earlier this week I went to leave work. I cranked the truck, and within 5 seconds it quit, never to restart.
It was hot, so I called the local roll back to take it home. First time its ever left me sitting. It may be a fuel pump, as both the low and high pressure are original. I haven't tested anything yet since I have the Dodge to drive. Guess I'll try to do some research today to see if the problem is fuel or fire.
If fuel, I'm going to change both pumps, since the fuel gauge is messed up anyway. Been thinking about just putting in a new tank also. This truck sits a LOT, so who knows what the tank looks like inside.
Back to module, sorry for the hi-jack. It was hot the day my truck quit. With the Tempo, it would quit mostly at stop lights.
When both my TFI modules failed they started acting up exactly the same. The truck would start "bucking". This is the common trait. If you read the Ford recall link you will see that Ford actually used this behavior in their defense against people being killed with truck quitting on the hwy - their argument being that drivers have ample warning about pending failure.
The first failure I had after 25 years or so was mild bucking. This last go around was like a ride at Billy Bobs. Turned around 200 yds from my house and just got home.
Almost *every* failed TFI module that I've ever replaced, has been due to somebody using lithium grease, or dielectric grease, or nothing at all, between the module, and the distributor mounting pad. I don't think it's ever been a Quality control issue with the modules themselves, it's been improper installation. Mostly driven by the replacement modules being shipped with *without* thermal paste, or shipped with something *other* that thermal paste in the box with the module.
Almost *every* failed TFI module that I've ever replaced, has been due to somebody using lithium grease, or dielectric grease, or nothing at all, between the module, and the distributor mounting pad. I don't think it's ever been a Quality control issue with the modules themselves, it's been improper installation. Mostly driven by the replacement modules being shipped with *without* thermal paste, or shipped with something *other* that thermal paste in the box with the module.
Just my $0.02
Remove whatever is on it when you buy it and use Artic Silver 5 on the TFI module and source a NOS Motorcraft module if you can.
The answer is a very big YES. AFAIK your module is mounted on the distributor. The module is very prone to failing and in some cases very quickly. There was a major Class Action Lawsuit over this and Ford subsequently mounted the units remotely.
I installed a remote mounting kit - heat sink and harness - made by McCully Racing Motors on my '91 5.8. I installed a NOS Motorcraft ignition module.
Do some searches and you will find lots of posts regarding the issue. Here is a link to one example I started.
Thanks a lot for this link. I plan on buying the MK2. how is it holding up on your truck?
I would like to point out, in addition to using the proper thermal paste, this isn't a "install it and forget about it forever" kind of thing. I generally replace the thermal paste on my modules every so often, as the stuff *does* dry out, and isn't going to last forever through a number of heat cycles in an underhood environment.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.