When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I really have no idea but I have a wild guess. The rear axle has more change when the truck is loaded so having the axle mounted closer to the short end would not create as much pinion angle change..
I can see your reasoning for that but on 70’s era trucks it’s opposite the equal length are in back and unequal up front.
My thought was maybe to control direction of bounce.
For your reference, here is a picture of my 1960 restored springs. The front springs a equal length (the shorter ones) and the rear springs are equal length.
Thanks for the pic.
I know the springs are equal in length with each other but I’m asking about the length from eye to the tie bolt.
The front springs are equal in length from each eye to the tie bolt but on the rear springs the distance from the front eye to the tie bolt is shorter than the distance from the rear eye to the tie bolt.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.