When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Agree 110%. If we have to use DPF/EGR/SCR crap on our trucks, then it shouldn't cost an arm and a leg to maintain. Reminds me of Obamacare. Health insurance was dirt cheap before the gov't mandated it and now its unaffordable.
I'm drinking what you're pushing. My thoughts 1000%
FWIW, I don't believe anyone here is the "emissions police." I don't really recall anyone here telling the OP what to do. I do recall different opinions being expressed but you know what they say about opinions.
Yeah, not yet. Was getting ahead of the curve and being tongue in cheek. No harm, no foul.
Comes down to you have to be happy with what you are running and other peoples thoughts really don't matter you must be happy.
That being said it is becoming more and more difficult to sell a diesel that had factory installed emissions equipment to a dealer as the regulations/law requires all applicable equipment be installed and functioning before it can be sold.
I was a victim of these laws not because I tried to sell a truck but because someone wanted to, they stole the entire system except for the DEF tank out from under my truck when I was on a job assignment. Cost over $3500.00 to get everything from the Turbo outlet to the rear axle replaced. Seems a used exhaust for the 6.7 goes for $1500.00, worth a lot more than the cost of scrap.
I was also stopped in California by the Highway Patrol and ticketed as "Gross Polluter" due to my old 6.9 smoked after a little after idling for extended periods (I got stuck in traffic jam for 5 hours), had a broken oil ring. again I was completing a job assignment in California this time. Didn't matter that I was from Washington it was their laws and when in their state you must abide by them.
Just be aware that even if there are no testing requirements where you live there are still possible ramifications to doing the modifications.
If DPFs are so important but just a filter, they should not be upwards of 4k f******* dollars to replace. It is a GD filter for crying out loud. This is one of those times that they know they have you, so they gouge you.
I have the info printed out but forget what company does it, there's a company that must cut out the ceramic soot "filtering" material and cleans it. I don't know how well they work but I can't imagine it's better than a brand new piece. They sell that reconditioned part along with a kit to allow an owner to cut out theirs and reinstall their kit.
Originally Posted by jollyrogr
Agree 110%. If we have to use DPF/EGR/SCR crap on our trucks, then it shouldn't cost an arm and a leg to maintain. Reminds me of Obamacare. Health insurance was dirt cheap before the gov't mandated it and now its unaffordable.
Those particulate filter components need to be serviced as all the other parts of the DPF are normally still good to go. I understand the concept of Ford not having that as a serviceable part as they make money selling the whole thing which IMO, is wrong and greedy as hell. Fomoco would probably solve a lot of their problems with the particulate filters and subsequent CELs by making them serviceable from the factory. But their bottom line is profit.
For work situations like a ranch truck and others where the truck idles a lot, I get deleting. I really do. In my honest and inexperienced opinion, I believe that's why Ford came out with the new 7.3 gasser. Sure it's the biggest and strongest gas engine out there, check it out Ram and GM. But it's over engineered and meant to go the distance for commercial use. I'm imagining Ford listened to the commercial customers on this one. So the 7.3 will be a great solution for those who can't delete, don't want to due to less options out there or who would be happy with a modern, well built big block gas engine.
IMO, emissions still have to advance to the point of being reliable in all situations moving forward. I was in high school in the early 80s when my dad was removing all the inefficient and unreliable "smog" components off our cars. Back then, the performance of those early emissions equipped cars was not what they were supposed to be. Look how far the gassers have evolved. So I believe that diesel emission technologies are still evolving because they have to in this "climate change" environment that is being jammed down our throats.
But DI engines still put out particulate matter that the EPA has ignored. While it's not as much as a diesel vehicle, there are more gas cars/trucks out there then there are diesel trucks like ours. I have seen articles and studies on this very subject. Particulate filters are probably coming for the gassers at one point. Don't shoot the messenger. Just stating the facts.
Last edited by Overkill2; Jul 7, 2020 at 09:04 AM.
Reason: Correct post
Trust me, if it was easier and not have the attention it does now, I'd probably delete with a stock and tow tune together when I had issues with the DPF.
I suspect that the reason that Ford doesn't make the DPF easily serviced is that an easily serviced DPF is also easily removed and left out.
Could very well be. I believe that there would be guys who have had success with it and no problems but reached the end of life for it would keep it. Not all but some.
Trust me, if it was easier and not have the attention it does now, I'd probably delete with a stock and tow tune together when I had issues with the DPF.
Dave,
I'm still early in the life of my delete. So far, it's running great. I have a 40 HP Tow Tune. I'm just after reliability, not outrageous power. I did it for the reasons you touched on - an elusive, continuing problem with the SCR system. I kept ALL of my components, and, if necessary, will re-install them and pick up where I left off with diagnosing the root cause. I would have preferred to keep it stock and emissions compliant, but I need the truck to be a reliable worker when I start towing my 5th wheel, and I just wasn't feeling any confidence in it.
BTW, I just ordered a 5 gallon pail of Triax Supreme 5W-40 and a Motorcraft filter. I plan to change the oil this weekend. I'm hoping that without the EGR, the oil won't get as much contamination as the stock set up does. Not sure if this is realistic at all...
IMO, emissions still have to advance to the point of being reliable in all situations moving forward. I was in high school in the early 80s when my dad was removing all the inefficient and unreliable "smog" components off our cars. Back then, the performance of those early emissions equipped cars was not what they were supposed to be. Look how far the gassers have evolved. So I believe that diesel emission technologies are still evolving because they have to in this "climate change" environment that is being jammed down our throats.
But DI engines still put out particulate matter that the EPA has ignored. While it's not as much as a diesel vehicle, there are more gas cars/trucks out there then there are diesel trucks like ours. I have seen articles and studies on this very subject. Particulate filters are probably coming for the gassers at one point. Don't shoot the messenger. Just stating the facts.
80's cars had terrible performance even with the smog crap removed. I feel like diesels became the target of the tree huggers because of the coal rollers.
Originally Posted by 55 BelAir Wagon
BTW, I just ordered a 5 gallon pail of Triax Supreme 5W-40 and a Motorcraft filter. I plan to change the oil this weekend. I'm hoping that without the EGR, the oil won't get as much contamination as the stock set up does. Not sure if this is realistic at all...
Regards,
John
Your oil should definitely stay cleaner without EGR.
Dave,
I'm still early in the life of my delete. So far, it's running great. I have a 40 HP Tow Tune. I'm just after reliability, not outrageous power. I did it for the reasons you touched on - an elusive, continuing problem with the SCR system. I kept ALL of my components, and, if necessary, will re-install them and pick up where I left off with diagnosing the root cause. I would have preferred to keep it stock and emissions compliant, but I need the truck to be a reliable worker when I start towing my 5th wheel, and I just wasn't feeling any confidence in it.
BTW, I just ordered a 5 gallon pail of Triax Supreme 5W-40 and a Motorcraft filter. I plan to change the oil this weekend. I'm hoping that without the EGR, the oil won't get as much contamination as the stock set up does. Not sure if this is realistic at all...
Regards,
John
Good luck with the truck John. I hope it gives you many miles and years of enjoyment. Thanks for commenting.
80's cars had terrible performance even with the smog crap removed. I feel like diesels became the target of the tree huggers because of the coal rollers.
Your oil should definitely stay cleaner without EGR.
I believe coal rollers and social media were definitely part of the problem. But it's also the progressive, everything's gotta be green unrealistic attitudes these days. The black smoke coming out of diesel vehicles didn't help any.
The oil will stay real clean without the EGR. I've heard from guys here plus a couple of guys I've got to know here.
80's cars had terrible performance even with the smog crap removed. I feel like diesels became the target of the tree huggers because of the coal rollers.
.
I don't know but one car I remember specifically is my buddy's late 80s IROQ Z28 with a stick shift and that car pulled pretty well. I think the 70s cars were really horrible was probably what I meant. But I still believe the diesels are going through the growing pains the gassers back then did when it comes to emissions.
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level
Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.