Notices
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Dentsides Ford Truck
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Moser

Dentside Hydroboost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 4, 2020 | 10:31 PM
  #16  
440 sixpack's Avatar
440 sixpack
Lead Driver
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 7,845
Likes: 2,353
They weren't 4 wheel disc and they weren't anti-lock but with just a hydroboost they still aren't. the pedal pressure required on stock brakes is minimal and was not really a struggle for me when these rigs were new, and now that I'm in my 50's it still isn't. maybe I'm just super strong or something and I might believe that if my 5'4 120 lb wife didn't pull a gooseneck stock trailer all the time with an F250 back in the day .

I'm not bashing anyone who does it I just don't get it. at all.
 
Reply
Old May 5, 2020 | 06:08 PM
  #17  
RalphXL's Avatar
RalphXL
Tuned
5 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 365
Likes: 13
Originally Posted by JacobJ
I've done a few Super Duty vacuum and hydro conversions. I used CAD software to design a Super Duty brake booster conversion (and a vacuum SD conversion too for that matter). The parts I have are only compatible with 99-04 SD brakes though. May be worth considering! feel free to message me or check out the site. The braking improvement is unreal.










https://www.battlebornbrakes.com/ford-trucks-73-79
Hey bud, could you tell me what fittings you have on your hydroboost? I'm running one out of a 2001 f-350 and I want to run braided lines but can't figure out what the fitting on the hydro boost is for the pressure lines. Searching around says it is a m16 x 1.5 but the Russel m16 x 1.5 I bought doesn't fit.
I talk about it in this thread I made a while ago.
https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1...t-install.html

Thanks.

Jess
 
Reply
Old May 5, 2020 | 07:45 PM
  #18  
JacobJ's Avatar
JacobJ
More Turbo
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 640
Likes: 10
Originally Posted by RalphXL
Hey bud, could you tell me what fittings you have on your hydroboost? I'm running one out of a 2001 f-350 and I want to run braided lines but can't figure out what the fitting on the hydro boost is for the pressure lines. Searching around says it is a m16 x 1.5 but the Russel m16 x 1.5 I bought doesn't fit.
I talk about it in this thread I made a while ago.
https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1...t-install.html

Thanks.

Jess
You need both an M16 and an M18 fitting, there are two pressure lines on the booster. The return line is a 3/8 hose barb- that Tees into the return from the steering box. Here are the part numbers I use for 99-04 SD hydroboost conversions:

6an male flare to M16-1.5 o ring (ICT Billet F06ANPSM1615 for example)

· 6an male flare to M18-1.5 o ring (ICT Billet F06ANPSM1815 for example)
 
Reply
Old May 5, 2020 | 08:11 PM
  #19  
J ballan's Avatar
J ballan
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 13
From: Saskatchewan
Originally Posted by JacobJ
I've done a few Super Duty vacuum and hydro conversions. I used CAD software to design a Super Duty brake booster conversion (and a vacuum SD conversion too for that matter). The parts I have are only compatible with 99-04 SD brakes though. May be worth considering! feel free to message me or check out the site. The braking improvement is unreal.










https://www.battlebornbrakes.com/ford-trucks-73-79
I don’t mean to hijack this thread but are you running rear discs? Will I need a proportioning valve for the rear brakes? Thanks
 
Reply
Old May 5, 2020 | 09:27 PM
  #20  
austincarnut's Avatar
austincarnut
Thread Starter
|
Cross-Country
5 Year Member
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
@ jocobj-- I know, I know... I am running a '92 OBS frame, with its brakes, they are stock, disc / drum. I just want feedback on hydroboost experiences dealing with my animal, not a 99+. I understand how it works, just would like to know about real world experiences.
 
Reply
Old May 6, 2020 | 04:14 PM
  #21  
JacobJ's Avatar
JacobJ
More Turbo
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 640
Likes: 10
Originally Posted by J ballan
I don’t mean to hijack this thread but are you running rear discs? Will I need a proportioning valve for the rear brakes? Thanks
Yes front and rear disc. A drum/drum valve works well for disc/disc as both combos require fairly equalized braking distribution. A disc/drum valve would give more front bias which isnt a bad thing. on a rainy day with an empty bed, if I slam on by brakes the rear end does lock up first. What you want to strongly avoid is running a drum/drum valve with disc/drum. That's the case regardless of booster/master setup.

Austin,

As far as a 92 hydroboost powering a 92 chassis with 92 brakes, that's a question for people who have 1992 trucks . And they work just fine, nothing wrong with them. In general though, I believe those master cylinders are either 1 1/6" bore or 1 1/8" bore. In my opinion, I would not go through all the trouble to convert to hydro to end up with a master that is less than 1 5/16" or 1 3/8". I know the larger bore is overkill, but it makes you pedal feel worlds better. My previous master cylinder was a 1 1/8" bore and I was not happy with it.
 
Reply
Old May 7, 2020 | 09:23 PM
  #22  
RalphXL's Avatar
RalphXL
Tuned
5 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 365
Likes: 13
Originally Posted by JacobJ
You need both an M16 and an M18 fitting, there are two pressure lines on the booster. The return line is a 3/8 hose barb- that Tees into the return from the steering box. Here are the part numbers I use for 99-04 SD hydroboost conversions:

6an male flare to M16-1.5 o ring (ICT Billet F06ANPSM1615 for example)

· 6an male flare to M18-1.5 o ring (ICT Billet F06ANPSM1815 for example)
I have Russell #648060 -6 x m16 x 1.5, and Aeromotive FBM2608 also -6 x m16 x 1.5 neither will fit. Thought I bought the 18mm adapter too but I can't seem to find it. Not sure why these don't fit. I pulled the hydroboost from the truck myself, so I'm kinda at a loss here.

Jess
 
Reply
Old May 7, 2020 | 09:26 PM
  #23  
JacobJ's Avatar
JacobJ
More Turbo
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 640
Likes: 10
Originally Posted by RalphXL
I have Russell #648060 -6 x m16 x 1.5, and Aeromotive FBM2608 also -6 x m16 x 1.5 neither will fit. Thought I bought the 18mm adapter too but I can't seem to find it. Not sure why these don't fit. I pulled the hydroboost from the truck myself, so I'm kinda at a loss here.

Jess
Thats really odd, are the threads damaged? Those part numbers I gave you I have purchased and used a have dozen times so I know they are winners
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old May 7, 2020 | 10:20 PM
  #24  
RalphXL's Avatar
RalphXL
Tuned
5 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 365
Likes: 13
The original lines screw right in, I grabbed them when I pulled the hydroboost. I'm wondering if it might have been a leftover from previous years that got put in the truck I pulled it from. From what I've read the earlier hydroboost units had 11/16" and 5/8" fittings which are close to 18mm and 16mm, just a little smaller. I'll have to look into that.

Jess
 
Reply
Old May 8, 2020 | 05:39 PM
  #25  
Shortbox4x4's Avatar
Shortbox4x4
Laughing Gas
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 828
Likes: 66
From: Hartford, WI
Originally Posted by 440 sixpack
They weren't 4 wheel disc and they weren't anti-lock but with just a hydroboost they still aren't. the pedal pressure required on stock brakes is minimal and was not really a struggle for me when these rigs were new, and now that I'm in my 50's it still isn't. maybe I'm just super strong or something and I might believe that if my 5'4 120 lb wife didn't pull a gooseneck stock trailer all the time with an F250 back in the day .

I'm not bashing anyone who does it I just don't get it. at all.
I just did the Hydroboost conversion to my 77 F150. I used the WildHorses 4x4 kit.

Wild Horses 4x4 HydroBoost Kit install 77 F1504x4

The truck before the conversion stopped ok but the pedal effort seemed way harder than what it should’ve been. I always felt like I had to cram my leg into the brake pedal. I’ll be pulling a ATV trailer a lot more with the truck this year so that was my main reason wanting to upgrade the power brake system.

Did the conversion about 2 weeks ago. I couldn’t be happier with how the brake pedal feels and how much less effort it takes to push and seems to help the truck brake better to boot.

 
Reply
Old May 8, 2022 | 11:43 AM
  #26  
austincarnut's Avatar
austincarnut
Thread Starter
|
Cross-Country
5 Year Member
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Good morning, its been a while but finally getting back to this ordeal, going back to the AN adapter fittings - Do you know if they are the same on the OBS hydroboost assembly? I found a good deal on a OBS superduty setup booster, master cyl etc. I was planning on running that in combination with my redhead steering box and saginaw pump. I'm not sure yet if the pump output pressure needs to be adjusted to handle the demands of the ford accessories.
 
Reply
Old May 8, 2022 | 12:52 PM
  #27  
speedfreak78's Avatar
speedfreak78
Cargo Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,238
Likes: 475
OBS should be standard fitting, 99+ SD will be metric.

Someone a couple posts up talks about the sizes.

Originally Posted by RalphXL
The original lines screw right in, I grabbed them when I pulled the hydroboost. I'm wondering if it might have been a leftover from previous years that got put in the truck I pulled it from. From what I've read the earlier hydroboost units had 11/16" and 5/8" fittings which are close to 18mm and 16mm, just a little smaller. I'll have to look into that.

Jess
 
Reply
Old May 10, 2022 | 07:12 PM
  #28  
austincarnut's Avatar
austincarnut
Thread Starter
|
Cross-Country
5 Year Member
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Has anyone converted their truck to 6AN?
 
Reply
Old May 10, 2022 | 07:55 PM
  #29  
flowney's Avatar
flowney
Cargo Master
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 2,212
Likes: 322
From: Central Florida
Originally Posted by austincarnut
Has anyone converted their truck to 6AN?
Yes, I used the Russell catalog to identify the adapters needed to go from a Saginaw pump to a Hydratech setup with CPP master cylinder with built in front/rear adjustment then to a cooler and back to the reservoir. It has dual returns, one for the brakes and one for the power steering.
 
Reply
Old May 11, 2022 | 01:27 PM
  #30  
Whiplaunch's Avatar
Whiplaunch
5th Wheeling
20 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 29
Likes: 3
From: Fairport, NY
I purchased the kit as well. Still deciding on the install. Did you use the 'T' fitting for the low pressure return lines or did you install a remote power steering reservoir like the diagram that was supplied with the kit from Hydratech showed? The instructions are for the use of the 'T' fitting.....
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:53 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE