Notices
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel 2003 - 2007 F250, F350 pickup and F350+ Cab Chassis, 2003 - 2005 Excursion and 2003 - 2009 van

Engine Rebuild Issue

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 23, 2020 | 02:48 PM
  #16  
Visurveyor's Avatar
Visurveyor
Fleet Mechanic
5 Year Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 1,629
Likes: 103
From: Jacksonville Florida
Club FTE Gold Member
Goes back to blown torque sequence, a lot of good info though. Gasket thicknes was probably in specs. Oil in bolt holes could give you that bad torque #, on that one stud.
question now is when ya remove the heads? I guess until you do that we're all guessing.
 
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2020 | 03:12 PM
  #17  
BG0360350's Avatar
BG0360350
Freshman User
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Did you oil the valve train before torquing the heads? If so oil may have run down and got all over and in between the gasket layers.....(don't ask me how I know)
 
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2020 | 03:25 PM
  #18  
SmackDaddy's Avatar
SmackDaddy
Postmaster
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 3,941
Likes: 240
From: Texas
Originally Posted by BG0360350
Did you oil the valve train before torquing the heads? If so oil may have run down and got all over and in between the gasket layers.....(don't ask me how I know)
Why in the world would you do that? Sounds like me not seating the braided oil hose STC fitting on the standpipe last week.
 
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2020 | 04:29 PM
  #19  
DillF250's Avatar
DillF250
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by SmackDaddy
Just a shot in the dark here. Besides all this good information, did you blow out each stud hole before installing the studs? Did you use a lot of oil or anything on the threads? You could have fluid in the block threads causing false torque values if you didn’t. (Edited)
I did not blow them out myself. Had a buddy who is experienced in building cummings and ARP stud installation procedures helping clean the contact surfaces and install the heads and studs. I recall him blowing the top of the block off and blowing into the stud holes. I do recall some oil residue coming from the holes and us wiping the contact surface clean again. Also recall asking if we needed to spray cleaner into the holes and blow them out again. WE DID NOT! We did not put any lubricant on the studs except where ARP requested (base of washer, between washer and nut base, threads for the nut. Not the block thread end.)
 
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2020 | 04:33 PM
  #20  
DillF250's Avatar
DillF250
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by BG0360350
Did you oil the valve train before torquing the heads? If so oil may have run down and got all over and in between the gasket layers.....(don't ask me how I know)
Negative! Poured oil over the valve train just before installing the valve covers.
 
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2020 | 09:33 PM
  #21  
namnguye's Avatar
namnguye
Laughing Gas
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 846
Likes: 34
(I replied to wrong thread before). So here is what I think. Hope you get thing sorted out soon. Would love to see pictures when you take thing apart. Send some measurements also.

I would use a straight edge to check the head and deck out. Below or equal to 2 thous is good. Lately, I read they relax it to 4 thous. Even more relax, they don't do end to end checking anymore. I do it anyway on mine.

Then put a new set of gasket and torque them correctly.
Once the hot cylinder gas breaches the gasket rubber seal, there is no more seal even you torque down again. So I don't know if there is any reason for guessing here.

As for why the torque was wrong, likely to be oil/lube in the thread. Because if you were careful, you would have went through one last time clicking everyone of then (without any turning).
 
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2020 | 12:53 PM
  #22  
DillF250's Avatar
DillF250
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by namnguye
(I replied to wrong thread before). So here is what I think. Hope you get thing sorted out soon. Would love to see pictures when you take thing apart. Send some measurements also.

I would use a straight edge to check the head and deck out. Below or equal to 2 thous is good. Lately, I read they relax it to 4 thous. Even more relax, they don't do end to end checking anymore. I do it anyway on mine.

Then put a new set of gasket and torque them correctly.
Once the hot cylinder gas breaches the gasket rubber seal, there is no more seal even you torque down again. So I don't know if there is any reason for guessing here.

As for why the torque was wrong, likely to be oil/lube in the thread. Because if you were careful, you would have went through one last time clicking everyone of then (without any turning).
Will post pictures and measurements once it's apart. The proper torque sequence was followed and checked multiple times while engine was on the stand. Only 1 stud on the drivers side (not checked pass side yet but will before disassembly) turned when checking the torque after driving and finding the oil leak.


New gaskets should arrive Friday and hopefully new torque wrench. Don't trust the one previously used.
 
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2020 | 01:47 PM
  #23  
TooManyToys.'s Avatar
TooManyToys.
Hotshot
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 17,823
Likes: 3,103
From: Jersey Shore
One of the issues we all have with ARPs studs is the use of the very low friction lubricant. I'm not saying it should not be used. But along with applied tension, holding fasteners in place is also static friction, at the threads and the interface (nuts and washers). Its the static friction threshold we have to overcome to get a fastener in motion again. And it's half of the reason for typically not using grease or oil on lug nuts.

With the static friction reduced, you can have an easier time for things to loosen. If there was something else going on here too, it can be a confluence.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Mar 25, 2020 | 02:51 PM
  #24  
SmackDaddy's Avatar
SmackDaddy
Postmaster
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 3,941
Likes: 240
From: Texas
I went 225 lb/ft on my ARP2000 studs both times and when I removed them last time I checked torque with the same wrench and none of them moved before it clicked. You have to be smooth and not jerk it when you torque them down.
This last time I torqued them down in sequence but went in 25 pound increments for a total of 10 cycles like we were discussing on my rebuild thread. In theory this should give a more even torque versus ARPs 3 step torque. Razzi ran the 225 lb/ft by ARP and they approved. This was at least the third time these studs have been used, they were on the engine when I bought it.
 
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2020 | 03:28 PM
  #25  
TooManyToys.'s Avatar
TooManyToys.
Hotshot
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 17,823
Likes: 3,103
From: Jersey Shore
At rest, its always static friction torque plus kinetic friction torque. You can drop the tension but you won't move. It's why rechecking a torque is mostly useless.

These should not more after the final torque. I'm just saying there is less static friction to keep them there.
 
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2020 | 05:26 PM
  #26  
DillF250's Avatar
DillF250
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by SmackDaddy
I went 225 lb/ft on my ARP2000 studs both times and when I removed them last time I checked torque with the same wrench and none of them moved before it clicked. You have to be smooth and not jerk it when you torque them down.
This last time I torqued them down in sequence but went in 25 pound increments for a total of 10 cycles like we were discussing on my rebuild thread. In theory this should give a more even torque versus ARPs 3 step torque. Razzi ran the 225 lb/ft by ARP and they approved. This was at least the third time these studs have been used, they were on the engine when I bought it.
I actual followed your thread thru out your build looking for do's and don'ts before beginning my build. Was curious about torqueing them to 225 ft-lb. Was this with or without the ARP lube?
 
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2020 | 06:06 PM
  #27  
DillF250's Avatar
DillF250
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
OK...…..I've been brain storming and replaying the build over and over in my head trying to figure out what went wrong, what did I do wrong. Been studying everyone's comments and nothing came to mind until reading ToManyToys post on static/kinetic friction torque. Got to thinking of anything that may have created extra tension during the torque sequence. The one thing I did against better judgement (listening to others) was torque the heads with the rockers and push rods in place! Is it possible that the extra tension from the valve springs and lifter caused incorrect torque values?
 
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2020 | 06:54 PM
  #28  
SmackDaddy's Avatar
SmackDaddy
Postmaster
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 3,941
Likes: 240
From: Texas
Originally Posted by DillF250
I actual followed your thread thru out your build looking for do's and don'ts before beginning my build. Was curious about torqueing them to 225 ft-lb. Was this with or without the ARP lube?
I used ARP lube
Originally Posted by DillF250
OK...…..I've been brain storming and replaying the build over and over in my head trying to figure out what went wrong, what did I do wrong. Been studying everyone's comments and nothing came to mind until reading ToManyToys post on static/kinetic friction torque. Got to thinking of anything that may have created extra tension during the torque sequence. The one thing I did against better judgement (listening to others) was torque the heads with the rockers and push rods in place! Is it possible that the extra tension from the valve springs and lifter caused incorrect torque values?
Possibly. That’s not standard procedure. Jack can elaborate but basically not how I gathered it should be done.
 
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2020 | 07:14 PM
  #29  
TooManyToys.'s Avatar
TooManyToys.
Hotshot
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 17,823
Likes: 3,103
From: Jersey Shore
Originally Posted by DillF250
OK...…..I've been brain storming and replaying the build over and over in my head trying to figure out what went wrong, what did I do wrong. Been studying everyone's comments and nothing came to mind until reading ToManyToys post on static/kinetic friction torque. Got to thinking of anything that may have created extra tension during the torque sequence. The one thing I did against better judgement (listening to others) was torque the heads with the rockers and push rods in place! Is it possible that the extra tension from the valve springs and lifter caused incorrect torque values?
That's how it reads in the manuals. Without the pushrods and rockers in place, you would need to use the special tool to push down the valves to install the rockers and pushrods after torquing everything down.

You may have just had one of those situations where you'll never find why.
 
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2020 | 08:22 PM
  #30  
SmackDaddy's Avatar
SmackDaddy
Postmaster
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 3,941
Likes: 240
From: Texas
Originally Posted by TooManyToys.
That's how it reads in the manuals. Without the pushrods and rockers in place, you would need to use the special tool to push down the valves to install the rockers and pushrods after torquing everything down.

You may have just had one of those situations where you'll never find why.
Now that I think about it I did it that way. I don’t know what I’m talking about. Mind on building chicken pen I guess!
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:35 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE