When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Goes back to blown torque sequence, a lot of good info though. Gasket thicknes was probably in specs. Oil in bolt holes could give you that bad torque #, on that one stud.
question now is when ya remove the heads? I guess until you do that we're all guessing.
Did you oil the valve train before torquing the heads? If so oil may have run down and got all over and in between the gasket layers.....(don't ask me how I know)
Did you oil the valve train before torquing the heads? If so oil may have run down and got all over and in between the gasket layers.....(don't ask me how I know)
Why in the world would you do that? Sounds like me not seating the braided oil hose STC fitting on the standpipe last week.
Just a shot in the dark here. Besides all this good information, did you blow out each stud hole before installing the studs? Did you use a lot of oil or anything on the threads? You could have fluid in the block threads causing false torque values if you didn’t. (Edited)
I did not blow them out myself. Had a buddy who is experienced in building cummings and ARP stud installation procedures helping clean the contact surfaces and install the heads and studs. I recall him blowing the top of the block off and blowing into the stud holes. I do recall some oil residue coming from the holes and us wiping the contact surface clean again. Also recall asking if we needed to spray cleaner into the holes and blow them out again. WE DID NOT! We did not put any lubricant on the studs except where ARP requested (base of washer, between washer and nut base, threads for the nut. Not the block thread end.)
Did you oil the valve train before torquing the heads? If so oil may have run down and got all over and in between the gasket layers.....(don't ask me how I know)
Negative! Poured oil over the valve train just before installing the valve covers.
(I replied to wrong thread before). So here is what I think. Hope you get thing sorted out soon. Would love to see pictures when you take thing apart. Send some measurements also.
I would use a straight edge to check the head and deck out. Below or equal to 2 thous is good. Lately, I read they relax it to 4 thous. Even more relax, they don't do end to end checking anymore. I do it anyway on mine.
Then put a new set of gasket and torque them correctly.
Once the hot cylinder gas breaches the gasket rubber seal, there is no more seal even you torque down again. So I don't know if there is any reason for guessing here.
As for why the torque was wrong, likely to be oil/lube in the thread. Because if you were careful, you would have went through one last time clicking everyone of then (without any turning).
(I replied to wrong thread before). So here is what I think. Hope you get thing sorted out soon. Would love to see pictures when you take thing apart. Send some measurements also.
I would use a straight edge to check the head and deck out. Below or equal to 2 thous is good. Lately, I read they relax it to 4 thous. Even more relax, they don't do end to end checking anymore. I do it anyway on mine.
Then put a new set of gasket and torque them correctly.
Once the hot cylinder gas breaches the gasket rubber seal, there is no more seal even you torque down again. So I don't know if there is any reason for guessing here.
As for why the torque was wrong, likely to be oil/lube in the thread. Because if you were careful, you would have went through one last time clicking everyone of then (without any turning).
Will post pictures and measurements once it's apart. The proper torque sequence was followed and checked multiple times while engine was on the stand. Only 1 stud on the drivers side (not checked pass side yet but will before disassembly) turned when checking the torque after driving and finding the oil leak.
New gaskets should arrive Friday and hopefully new torque wrench. Don't trust the one previously used.
One of the issues we all have with ARPs studs is the use of the very low friction lubricant. I'm not saying it should not be used. But along with applied tension, holding fasteners in place is also static friction, at the threads and the interface (nuts and washers). Its the static friction threshold we have to overcome to get a fastener in motion again. And it's half of the reason for typically not using grease or oil on lug nuts.
With the static friction reduced, you can have an easier time for things to loosen. If there was something else going on here too, it can be a confluence.
I went 225 lb/ft on my ARP2000 studs both times and when I removed them last time I checked torque with the same wrench and none of them moved before it clicked. You have to be smooth and not jerk it when you torque them down.
This last time I torqued them down in sequence but went in 25 pound increments for a total of 10 cycles like we were discussing on my rebuild thread. In theory this should give a more even torque versus ARPs 3 step torque. Razzi ran the 225 lb/ft by ARP and they approved. This was at least the third time these studs have been used, they were on the engine when I bought it.
At rest, its always static friction torque plus kinetic friction torque. You can drop the tension but you won't move. It's why rechecking a torque is mostly useless.
These should not more after the final torque. I'm just saying there is less static friction to keep them there.
I went 225 lb/ft on my ARP2000 studs both times and when I removed them last time I checked torque with the same wrench and none of them moved before it clicked. You have to be smooth and not jerk it when you torque them down.
This last time I torqued them down in sequence but went in 25 pound increments for a total of 10 cycles like we were discussing on my rebuild thread. In theory this should give a more even torque versus ARPs 3 step torque. Razzi ran the 225 lb/ft by ARP and they approved. This was at least the third time these studs have been used, they were on the engine when I bought it.
I actual followed your thread thru out your build looking for do's and don'ts before beginning my build. Was curious about torqueing them to 225 ft-lb. Was this with or without the ARP lube?
OK...…..I've been brain storming and replaying the build over and over in my head trying to figure out what went wrong, what did I do wrong. Been studying everyone's comments and nothing came to mind until reading ToManyToys post on static/kinetic friction torque. Got to thinking of anything that may have created extra tension during the torque sequence. The one thing I did against better judgement (listening to others) was torque the heads with the rockers and push rods in place! Is it possible that the extra tension from the valve springs and lifter caused incorrect torque values?
I actual followed your thread thru out your build looking for do's and don'ts before beginning my build. Was curious about torqueing them to 225 ft-lb. Was this with or without the ARP lube?
I used ARP lube
Originally Posted by DillF250
OK...…..I've been brain storming and replaying the build over and over in my head trying to figure out what went wrong, what did I do wrong. Been studying everyone's comments and nothing came to mind until reading ToManyToys post on static/kinetic friction torque. Got to thinking of anything that may have created extra tension during the torque sequence. The one thing I did against better judgement (listening to others) was torque the heads with the rockers and push rods in place! Is it possible that the extra tension from the valve springs and lifter caused incorrect torque values?
Possibly. That’s not standard procedure. Jack can elaborate but basically not how I gathered it should be done.
OK...…..I've been brain storming and replaying the build over and over in my head trying to figure out what went wrong, what did I do wrong. Been studying everyone's comments and nothing came to mind until reading ToManyToys post on static/kinetic friction torque. Got to thinking of anything that may have created extra tension during the torque sequence. The one thing I did against better judgement (listening to others) was torque the heads with the rockers and push rods in place! Is it possible that the extra tension from the valve springs and lifter caused incorrect torque values?
That's how it reads in the manuals. Without the pushrods and rockers in place, you would need to use the special tool to push down the valves to install the rockers and pushrods after torquing everything down.
You may have just had one of those situations where you'll never find why.
That's how it reads in the manuals. Without the pushrods and rockers in place, you would need to use the special tool to push down the valves to install the rockers and pushrods after torquing everything down.
You may have just had one of those situations where you'll never find why.
Now that I think about it I did it that way. I don’t know what I’m talking about. Mind on building chicken pen I guess!