Notices
6.7L Power Stroke Diesel 2011-current Ford Powerstroke 6.7 L turbo diesel engine

Stirring the pot

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 25, 2019 | 08:58 AM
  #31  
Overkill2's Avatar
Overkill2
FTE Legend
5 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 31,962
Likes: 9,194
From: Western NY
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by speakerfritz
10K on a superduty is no problem. I towed 26K with a windstar for 7 hrs. and then we have the new f-150 that can tow a million miles.
Actually 1.25M pounds. But stopping it would be the problem.
 
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2019 | 01:08 PM
  #32  
Overkill2's Avatar
Overkill2
FTE Legend
5 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 31,962
Likes: 9,194
From: Western NY
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by djousma
Google search the subject guys...my comments still stand until someone proves otherwise. GAWR on the sticker is max engineering limits set by Ford. Changing to heavier duty wheels/tires does not change that. Changing to lighter duty wheels/tires reduces the load that can be safely carried.

Linky

Thanks for that link.
 
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2019 | 08:25 PM
  #33  
Desert Don's Avatar
Desert Don
Hotshot
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 10,187
Likes: 8,069
From: Texas
Originally Posted by djousma
Google search the subject guys...my comments still stand until someone proves otherwise. GAWR on the sticker is max engineering limits set by Ford. Changing to heavier duty wheels/tires does not change that. Changing to lighter duty wheels/tires reduces the load that can be safely carried.

Linky
And I believe that /Dave is correct in his statement here. I had a discussion with another gentleman on axle ratings in another thread in this forum.
I had read that the DANA M300 was rated from DANA at 16000 lb, which is correct.....in a way.........the small print says “up to 16000”!!!! Ford rates it at 9900 lb, I believe. So, in a Super Duty..........9900 is it.

The door sticker IS what the axle is rated.
 
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2019 | 07:00 AM
  #34  
System's Avatar
System
Prolocutor
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 13,618
Likes: 1,247
From: Western MA
Club FTE Gold Member
I would say right and wrong here guys. The axle rating is not necessarily an engineering number... but lets back up to the beginning. It's not just the tires that limit the GAWR it's also determined by the springs Ford uses (on the current gen SD). Now, lets look at the 2011-2016 generation because it's the simplest to analyze though. That generation could be ordered with the identical rear axle, springs, and tires between the 250 and SRW 350. (The only difference in some years was the spacer block under the rear springpack but that did not affect load capacity.) Interesting thing was, the identical rear GAWR setup in 250 was derated just like the GVWR of the 250. I can't remember exactly (and am too lazy to look it up) but it was close to 1000# different for no engineering reason at all. Just like the GVWR was derated from 11.5k to 10k without an engineering reason to do so. To put it plainly, in 2016 when both trucks got the same spacer block, an F250 with the camper pkg was 100% identical to an SRW 350 but for the badges but many ratings between the two were different. The same applies to the 10k de-rate package on the SRW 350 that is available for folks in certain states to save money on registration fees. Same truck, different ratings. For 2017 forward, there was finally one difference between the high capacity tow package 250 and the SRW 350. One leaf in the rear spring pack. So, I guess what I'm trying to say here is that sometimes GAWR is not set from an engineering standpoint. So, on a 250 for example, all you need to increase it (not legally but practically) would be to increase the rear tire pressure to 80 psi.
 
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2019 | 08:38 AM
  #35  
StanleyZ's Avatar
StanleyZ
Logistics Pro
20 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,788
Likes: 103
From: Georgia
Originally Posted by Karl4Cat
I would say right and wrong here guys. The axle rating is not necessarily an engineering number... but lets back up to the beginning. It's not just the tires that limit the GAWR it's also determined by the springs Ford uses (on the current gen SD). Now, lets look at the 2011-2016 generation because it's the simplest to analyze though. That generation could be ordered with the identical rear axle, springs, and tires between the 250 and SRW 350. (The only difference in some years was the spacer block under the rear springpack but that did not affect load capacity.) Interesting thing was, the identical rear GAWR setup in 250 was derated just like the GVWR of the 250. I can't remember exactly (and am too lazy to look it up) but it was close to 1000# different for no engineering reason at all. Just like the GVWR was derated from 11.5k to 10k without an engineering reason to do so. To put it plainly, in 2016 when both trucks got the same spacer block, an F250 with the camper pkg was 100% identical to an SRW 350 but for the badges but many ratings between the two were different. The same applies to the 10k de-rate package on the SRW 350 that is available for folks in certain states to save money on registration fees. Same truck, different ratings. For 2017 forward, there was finally one difference between the high capacity tow package 250 and the SRW 350. One leaf in the rear spring pack. So, I guess what I'm trying to say here is that sometimes GAWR is not set from an engineering standpoint. So, on a 250 for example, all you need to increase it (not legally but practically) would be to increase the rear tire pressure to 80 psi.
Ye sir, you are correct. Ford builds these trucks to sell. They manipulate those numbers for sales reasons. In some states that 10,000 lb number triggers a higher tax bill. And in NY the F350 badge triggers an automatic Commercial vehicle rating and they charge a lot more at the toll booths. At least that was the case in 2008. Otherwise there would be no reason to badge a SRW F350, it is the same truck as the f250. Go on the ambulance build sites and look it up. Might be some minor difference in spring pack but for hauling and towing purposes not enough to make a real difference.

As I recall the OP was saying that the 10,000 rated trucks should not pull "most popular 5th wheels". Sorry sir, but I found that all the 10.000 rated trucks had a cargo rating of 3200 lbs or more, mostly more. There are dozens of popular fifth wheels that have a low enough hitch weight for that application. a 12,000 lb trailer has a pin weight of 2000 (17%) or less. That leaves 12,000 lbs for whatever. Even if you pack it to the hilt to 14,000 ( pin wt 2380) there is still 700 lbs of cargo in the truck. And if you want to be heavier than that there are lots of after market remedies available. It should also be noted that how you load the trailer can impact the pin weight but I won't get in to that. The people building trailers are not dummies. They know what trucks are out there and they know that when you get where you are going you have to drive the truck. So, the smaller the better. I have been pulling a fifth wheel for 20 years and I promise there are tens of thousands of fifth wheels out there being pulled nicely with 3/4 ton trucks. If you will look back on this thread you will find a picture of my Mobile Suites behind my F250 Shorty. I ran this rig for a year without a problem. Admittedly it is not nearly as comfortable as using my dually but neither is it dangerous. Mods to the F250 were air bags, Rickson wheels and 14 ply tires (not shown in pictures) and a full set of gauges to monitor that beautiful example of American engines built without government interference, the 7.3L. Now I'm going away to hide because I know better than to get involved in weight threads. I just couldn't help myself.
 
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2019 | 11:08 AM
  #36  
mjs2011's Avatar
mjs2011
Tuned
5 Year Member
Liked
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 279
Likes: 14
From: Brookings, SD
Originally Posted by StanleyZ
Ye sir, you are correct. Ford builds these trucks to sell. They manipulate those numbers for sales reasons. In some states that 10,000 lb number triggers a higher tax bill. And in NY the F350 badge triggers an automatic Commercial vehicle rating and they charge a lot more at the toll booths. At least that was the case in 2008. Otherwise there would be no reason to badge a SRW F350, it is the same truck as the f250. Go on the ambulance build sites and look it up. Might be some minor difference in spring pack but for hauling and towing purposes not enough to make a real difference.

As I recall the OP was saying that the 10,000 rated trucks should not pull "most popular 5th wheels". Sorry sir, but I found that all the 10.000 rated trucks had a cargo rating of 3200 lbs or more, mostly more. There are dozens of popular fifth wheels that have a low enough hitch weight for that application. a 12,000 lb trailer has a pin weight of 2000 (17%) or less. That leaves 12,000 lbs for whatever. Even if you pack it to the hilt to 14,000 ( pin wt 2380) there is still 700 lbs of cargo in the truck. And if you want to be heavier than that there are lots of after market remedies available. It should also be noted that how you load the trailer can impact the pin weight but I won't get in to that. The people building trailers are not dummies. They know what trucks are out there and they know that when you get where you are going you have to drive the truck. So, the smaller the better. I have been pulling a fifth wheel for 20 years and I promise there are tens of thousands of fifth wheels out there being pulled nicely with 3/4 ton trucks. If you will look back on this thread you will find a picture of my Mobile Suites behind my F250 Shorty. I ran this rig for a year without a problem. Admittedly it is not nearly as comfortable as using my dually but neither is it dangerous. Mods to the F250 were air bags, Rickson wheels and 14 ply tires (not shown in pictures) and a full set of gauges to monitor that beautiful example of American engines built without government interference, the 7.3L. Now I'm going away to hide because I know better than to get involved in weight threads. I just couldn't help myself.
Look up the payload cap for a crew cab 4x4 long box diesel f250. Its significantly less than 3200 lbs. Thats the problem. Payload is specced as GVWR (10K for a 250) minus the weight of the truck. So single cab 2WD has significantly higher payload based on that calculation.
 
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2019 | 09:28 PM
  #37  
StanleyZ's Avatar
StanleyZ
Logistics Pro
20 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,788
Likes: 103
From: Georgia
Originally Posted by mjs2011
Look up the payload cap for a crew cab 4x4 long box diesel f250. Its significantly less than 3200 lbs. Thats the problem. Payload is specced as GVWR (10K for a 250) minus the weight of the truck. So single cab 2WD has significantly higher payload based on that calculation.

I just left the site but didn’t get a link to post. Google ford truck weight capacities. F250 cc. Had several depending on wheel base and drive but lowest pay load was 3100. Highest was 3800.
 
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2019 | 09:33 PM
  #38  
Army RET's Avatar
Army RET
Thread Starter
|
Posting Guru
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,430
Likes: 6
From: Alabama
I just left the site but didn’t get a link to post. Google ford truck weight capacities. F250 cc. Had several depending on wheel base and drive but lowest pay load was 3100. Highest was 3800.

AS ONE OF MY HS TEACHERS USED TO SAY - BACK UP THAT STATEMENT WITH ACTUAL INFO.
VISIT A LOCAL DEALER AND PEEK AT HIS INVENTORY DOOR JAM STICKERS.

And remember, these newer trucks are aluminum = where its' lesser weight = greater cargo.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ways Ford is LOSING to the Competition

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

Top 6 Best Deals Available on New Fords & Lincolns Right Now

 Brett Foote
story-2

This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

 Brett Foote
story-5

10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-6

Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

 Brett Foote
story-7

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Jul 26, 2019 | 10:00 PM
  #39  
mjs2011's Avatar
mjs2011
Tuned
5 Year Member
Liked
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 279
Likes: 14
From: Brookings, SD
Originally Posted by StanleyZ
I just left the site but didn’t get a link to post. Google ford truck weight capacities. F250 cc. Had several depending on wheel base and drive but lowest pay load was 3100. Highest was 3800.
You have to actually weigh your truck and subtract it from the gvwr. The rated payload doesn't include any passengers, fuel, cargo, etc which all take away from the payload.

Case in point, my 05 f250 weighed about 8500 lbs with me in it, and with a 10k gvwr, I had 1500 lbs left for my campers pin weight.
 
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2019 | 10:46 PM
  #40  
HRTKD's Avatar
HRTKD
Hotshot
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 19,722
Likes: 12,865
From: Wyoming
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by mjs2011
You have to actually weigh your truck and subtract it from the gvwr. The rated payload doesn't include any passengers, fuel, cargo, etc which all take away from the payload.

Case in point, my 05 f250 weighed about 8500 lbs with me in it, and with a 10k gvwr, I had 1500 lbs left for my campers pin weight.
The payload already takes into account a full tank of fuel. 48 gallons of fuel adds up on my truck.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DESERT ED
All Things Towing
16
Aug 23, 2024 09:18 AM
DadOh1
All Things Towing
21
Mar 3, 2019 05:50 PM
CLE-PRE
2009 - 2014 F150
5
Feb 1, 2018 05:14 PM
bkuuz1
All Things Towing
11
Aug 21, 2017 02:21 PM
SDice
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
10
Aug 17, 2003 03:31 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:35 AM.

story-0
10 Ways Ford is LOSING to the Competition

Slideshow: 10 ways Ford is losing to the competition

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-15 09:52:01


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 6 Best Deals Available on New Fords & Lincolns Right Now

Some great targets in today's expensive world.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-15 09:35:19


VIEW MORE
story-2
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-12 11:01:55


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

Slideshow: Top 10 Fords at 2026 Ford Nationals

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-09 11:10:08


VIEW MORE
story-4
3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

Based on years of owning multiple modern Ford products.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-09 10:53:36


VIEW MORE
story-5
10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

SPONSORED: From muddy boots to rain-soaked cargo, these upgrades address some of the most common frustrations Ford truck owners face every day.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-06-08 18:50:34


VIEW MORE
story-6
Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

Here's everything you need to know about every Ford engine available for the 2026 model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-05 12:58:01


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-9
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE