Notices
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Fat Fendered and Classic Ford Trucks

Spindle Adapters for Disk Brakes.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 21, 2019 | 10:11 PM
  #1  
bjmayberry2's Avatar
bjmayberry2
Thread Starter
|
Lead Driver
Veteran: National Guard
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 9,717
Likes: 823
From: Wentzville, MO
Club FTE Gold Member
Spindle Adapters for Disk Brakes.

While waiting for my 56 in the bodyshop I decided to work on my newly acquired 53 Panel. I had to remove the wheels to work on the king Pins (frozen). I Found out there were no brake parts on either front wheel. I decided to just bite the bullet and install front disk brakes as well as king pins. King pins went well, other than machining is a little pricey $100.00 to remove & install the bushings and ream them. When I went to install the CPP inner wheel bearing adapter it just spins on the spindle. In their paperwork (and from prior installs) the adapters should need to be pressed on or heated to allow them to fit on the spindle snuggly. These spin with no resistance. I contacted CPP tech support and they sent me adapter specs and asked me to mic the ones I currently have.
Adapters ID Specs 1.3125 +.0000 / -0015
my Adapters are both 1.304
my spindle is 1.313

While CPP hasn’t given me a final response the Tech guy did say that I might have to use JB Weld on them. What do you all think about JB Weld on a spindle?
 
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2019 | 10:24 PM
  #2  
52 Merc's Avatar
52 Merc
Hotshot
15 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 3
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 16,173
Likes: 4,780
From: Burbank, WA
Originally Posted by bjmayberry2
I contacted CPP tech support and they sent me adapter specs and asked me to mic the ones I currently have.
Adapters ID Specs 1.3125 +.0000 / -0015
my Adapters are both 1.304
my spindle is 1.313

While CPP hasn’t given me a final response the Tech guy did say that I might have to use JB Weld on them. What do you all think about JB Weld on a spindle?
Maybe I'm confused, but isn't 1.304 smaller than 1.313?

The tolerances may be small enough that it might not matter, but my first thought would be how to get the adapters centered on the spindle while the JB Weld cured. I see a hub wobble in your future. I don't think I would trust it in a load application like that. If they can't send you different adapters that fit tight, perhaps you might want to try different spindles.
 
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2019 | 10:49 PM
  #3  
bjmayberry2's Avatar
bjmayberry2
Thread Starter
|
Lead Driver
Veteran: National Guard
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 9,717
Likes: 823
From: Wentzville, MO
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by 52 Merc
Maybe I'm confused, but isn't 1.304 smaller than 1.313?

The tolerances may be small enough that it might not matter, but my first thought would be how to get the adapters centered on the spindle while the JB Weld cured. I see a hub wobble in your future. I don't think I would trust it in a load application like that. If they can't send you different adapters that fit tight, perhaps you might want to try different spindles.
Not sure what’s up. I agree that 1.304 is smaller than 1.313. So I went back to measure them again. Same ID of adapter is 1.304, OD of spindle is 1.313 but the adapters spin on the spindles? I’m using a HF INSIDE/OUT SIDE 6” digital caliper. Just checked the king pins. The bushing is smaller than the pin??? Guess I’ve gotta get a different caliper.
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2019 | 04:42 AM
  #4  
bigwin56f100's Avatar
bigwin56f100
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 9,366
Likes: 1,724
From: AKRON ohio
I'll throw out a guess. I'd guess the axle is a 57-60? Old hot rod trick to lower the front 1"
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2019 | 07:30 AM
  #5  
Greg Rogers's Avatar
Greg Rogers
Fleet Mechanic
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,877
Likes: 295
From: Central Michigan
BJ, I put mine on and they also were a slip fit. It seems I asked around about it and was told to go ahead and try it, which I did. I now have the truck running and everything is great with the brakes. I used the plates and ordered new bearings/races and seals, and used Ford rotors and the Chevy calipers as they said. Only problem I had was the first calipers I got were for the light duty brake and weren't wide enough with the Ford rotors. Then I called their tech line and was told I needed the calipers of a 87 Chevy PU with HD brakes. Then it all worked good. It is in my build thread towards the front I think if you want to see it. Greg.
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2019 | 08:32 AM
  #6  
moejr's Avatar
moejr
Fleet Mechanic
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,682
Likes: 1,460
From: Mendon, Massachusetts
Had the same issues with the kit I got from Speedway, they sent new adapters and they still didn't fit snug on the spindle. I ended up tack welding them so they would stay put. Also had to polish the outside dia. so the bearing would slide on without binding........... so far so good
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2019 | 09:11 AM
  #7  
artscott61's Avatar
artscott61
Fleet Mechanic
Veteran: Navy
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,665
Likes: 111
From: southwest missouri
Club FTE Gold Member
BJ my adapters fit on the spindle loose enough where I can remove them but most of the time when I pull the rotor off the adapter stays in the rotor held by the seal.
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2019 | 09:30 AM
  #8  
bjmayberry2's Avatar
bjmayberry2
Thread Starter
|
Lead Driver
Veteran: National Guard
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 9,717
Likes: 823
From: Wentzville, MO
Club FTE Gold Member
Thanks for the replies guys.

With the adapter loose I’d be afraid the adapter will spin and ruin the spindle.

It’s pretty bad that they can’t provide a product as intended. Their instructions clearly say press or heat the adapter to install on the spindle.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-3

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-5

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-9

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
Old Feb 22, 2019 | 09:36 AM
  #9  
bjmayberry2's Avatar
bjmayberry2
Thread Starter
|
Lead Driver
Veteran: National Guard
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 9,717
Likes: 823
From: Wentzville, MO
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by bigwin56f100
I'll throw out a guess. I'd guess the axle is a 57-60? Old hot rod trick to lower the front 1"
I checked several Spindles (56s & 54) after I found the adapters loose. They spin on All of them. But good to know about the 57-60 spindles though.

Anybody got the factory measurements for a 53-56 F-100 spindle?


 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2019 | 10:46 AM
  #10  
52 Merc's Avatar
52 Merc
Hotshot
15 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 3
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 16,173
Likes: 4,780
From: Burbank, WA
Originally Posted by bjmayberry2
Thanks for the replies guys.

With the adapter loose I’d be afraid the adapter will spin and ruin the spindle.

That is exactly what will happen. It can lead to a dangerous condition of potential failure of any or all of the affected parts. Tack welding could be an option if proper replacements can't be procured. The adapter definitely needs to be solidly attached.
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2019 | 12:04 PM
  #11  
raytasch's Avatar
raytasch
Believe Nothing
20 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 7,514
Likes: 398
From: W. Central FL.
Club FTE Silver Member

I am certain there are engineering specification for fit on such applications. Sounds like the spacer was designed to be an interference fit. Be mindful the bearing inner race is designed to be a slip fit onto the spindle and when adjustment and lubrication are right, they don't spin on the spindles.
Personally, I would not weld nor use any JB Weld product that I am familiar with. They may have something new that I am unaware of. If I felt the clearance was too great for my comfort, I would investigate a sleeve or a product by "Loctite" that is used on worn splines. I've used the Loctite product on tractors and it held up well.
JB, did you ever get accurate dimensions?
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2019 | 12:13 PM
  #12  
52 Merc's Avatar
52 Merc
Hotshot
15 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 3
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 16,173
Likes: 4,780
From: Burbank, WA
Originally Posted by raytasch
I am certain there are engineering specification for fit on such applications. Sounds like the spacer was designed to be an interference fit. Be mindful the bearing inner race is designed to be a slip fit onto the spindle and when adjustment and lubrication are right, they don't spin on the spindles.
Personally, I would not weld nor use any JB Weld product that I am familiar with. They may have something new that I am unaware of. If I felt the clearance was too great for my comfort, I would investigate a sleeve or a product by "Loctite" that is used on worn splines. I've used the Loctite product on tractors and it held up well.
JB, did you ever get accurate dimensions?
You are correct, Ray, that the spacer is designed to be an interference fit. The idea is for it to be an extension of the spindle to take up the space between where the smaller, original OEM spec bearing would ride, and the larger diameter bearing of the new, replacement hub. It needs to fit tight for it and the bearing to do their jobs, as designed. I see the problem as being an incorrect manufacture/machining of the spacer. Unfortunately this is way too typical of the aftermarket parts we get, not only for our trucks, but the entire restoration hobby as a whole. Or, in the words of the illustrious Maxwell Smart, "Missed it by that much."
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2019 | 01:56 PM
  #13  
BlueOvalRage's Avatar
BlueOvalRage
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,571
Likes: 22
From: Oxford, Indiana
Club FTE Silver Member

Don't use JB Weld. Use this instead:

Amazon Amazon


This stuff is specifically made for this purpose. Easy to apply, not a permanent or destructive mod like welding, and that adapter is NOT coming back off without the assistance of a propane torch.
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2019 | 05:36 PM
  #14  
hulleywoodworking's Avatar
hulleywoodworking
More Turbo
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 525
Likes: 57
From: Kenmore, NY
On my 51 F1, the instructions called for gluing the adapters to the spindles with Loctite. Like yours, mine were a little too loose for my comfort, so I chucked the spindles up on my lathe and knurled the spindles where the adapter sits. I had to heat the adapter and chill the spindle to assemble. I still used the Loctite just to be sure.

My lathe is a 14" with a 12" 4 jaw chuck. It took a little thought to come up with a way to chuck the spindles on center. No pictures.
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2019 | 02:54 PM
  #15  
bjmayberry2's Avatar
bjmayberry2
Thread Starter
|
Lead Driver
Veteran: National Guard
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 9,717
Likes: 823
From: Wentzville, MO
Club FTE Gold Member
I thought about having the spindles knurled. Not sure what it would cost though. Also I didn’t remove the tie rod arms from my spindles and am not sure how to get them off now the spindles have been removed from the axles.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:46 PM.

story-0
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-2
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-4
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-5
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-6
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-8
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE