It's time! - Injector Size Recommendation Needed
97 7.3L 185k miles
4:10 gears / 35" tires
"Built" E4OD/converter/cooler etc
Super Duty intercooler
Riffraff wheel / stock turbo, good condition
AFE air intake
Driven Diesel E fuel system
High flow fuel banjo bolts
3" DP / 4" exhaust/muffler
Terminator T500 HPOP
Gauges / makes 23PSI at redline currently at 6000ft elevation
I tow fairly heavy but nothing extreme. I do plan on upgrading the turbo in the future but I don't think I'll go T4 or anything. So maybe a 38R at most, I dunno?
Thank you in advance!
My dually has no problem hitting 35 psi if I want it to with a stock turbo and a ts 6 with good tunes.
Do you think I'll need to do injector cups too at 185k miles? Ive had a couple other 7.3 guys say prob not...
Trending Topics
The only time I switch it to a bigger tune is when some jack wagon acts a fool and I'll smoke them out
But I'm working on my anger Issues
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
I may be wrong about all of that, but I'm pretty confident 160/80s are the ticket for the OP's truck and what he wants. He already has all the supporting mods to handle them, except maybe bigger turbo for the best results. 160/0s will absolutely work for his truck and will be a decent power bump, but why not get so much more power on the table with the 80%? If you feel they are overkill, it's as simple as tuning them down a bit.
Another thing with bigger injectors is HOW they enlarge the nozzle holes. 30% and 100% flow nozzles are harder to tune accurately than 0% or 80%. I don't know the specifics, but basically, they "clean up and smooth out" the nozzle holes on a 0% to get a 30% nozzle. Same goes for 100% from a 80% nozzle. What makes the 80% easier to tune is they precisely drill out the nozzle holes to 80%, which makes them much more consistant. Tuners guess a lot less on fueling parameters when tuning for a 80% nozzle as opposed to a 30%.
gearhead tuning is a popular tuning choice again, now that a certain problem employee is finally gone.
1023 tuning is new on the block, but the 1999-2003 guys have been saying nothing but good things about them. They are quickly becoming a favorite and I will likely be buying some tunes from them soon for my '99.
as for tuning devices, the PHP Hydra is hands-down the most recommended device for any 7.3 powerstroke. It's the go-to tuning platform for most of the custom tune writers now. The TS chip will work as good as a hydra, but has to be sent in every time you want to switch tuning. You can just plug your computer into the hydra for easy tuning changes.
I may be wrong about all of that, but I'm pretty confident 160/80s are the ticket for the OP's truck and what he wants. He already has all the supporting mods to handle them, except maybe bigger turbo for the best results. 160/0s will absolutely work for his truck and will be a decent power bump, but why not get so much more power on the table with the 80%? If you feel they are overkill, it's as simple as tuning them down a bit.
Another thing with bigger injectors is HOW they enlarge the nozzle holes. 30% and 100% flow nozzles are harder to tune accurately than 0% or 80%. I don't know the specifics, but basically, they "clean up and smooth out" the nozzle holes on a 0% to get a 30% nozzle. Same goes for 100% from a 80% nozzle. What makes the 80% easier to tune is they precisely drill out the nozzle holes to 80%, which makes them much more consistant. Tuners guess a lot less on fueling parameters when tuning for a 80% nozzle as opposed to a 30%.
gearhead tuning is a popular tuning choice again, now that a certain problem employee is finally gone.
1023 tuning is new on the block, but the 1999-2003 guys have been saying nothing but good things about them. They are quickly becoming a favorite and I will likely be buying some tunes from them soon for my '99.
as for tuning devices, the PHP Hydra is hands-down the most recommended device for any 7.3 powerstroke. It's the go-to tuning platform for most of the custom tune writers now. The TS chip will work as good as a hydra, but has to be sent in every time you want to switch tuning. You can just plug your computer into the hydra for easy tuning changes.
My tuner does fine remotely tuning my 200% nozzles with my lil charger.
I may be wrong about all of that, but I'm pretty confident 160/80s are the ticket for the OP's truck and what he wants. He already has all the supporting mods to handle them, except maybe bigger turbo for the best results. 160/0s will absolutely work for his truck and will be a decent power bump, but why not get so much more power on the table with the 80%? If you feel they are overkill, it's as simple as tuning them down a bit.
Another thing with bigger injectors is HOW they enlarge the nozzle holes. 30% and 100% flow nozzles are harder to tune accurately than 0% or 80%. I don't know the specifics, but basically, they "clean up and smooth out" the nozzle holes on a 0% to get a 30% nozzle. Same goes for 100% from a 80% nozzle. What makes the 80% easier to tune is they precisely drill out the nozzle holes to 80%, which makes them much more consistant. Tuners guess a lot less on fueling parameters when tuning for a 80% nozzle as opposed to a 30%.
gearhead tuning is a popular tuning choice again, now that a certain problem employee is finally gone.
1023 tuning is new on the block, but the 1999-2003 guys have been saying nothing but good things about them. They are quickly becoming a favorite and I will likely be buying some tunes from them soon for my '99.
as for tuning devices, the PHP Hydra is hands-down the most recommended device for any 7.3 powerstroke. It's the go-to tuning platform for most of the custom tune writers now. The TS chip will work as good as a hydra, but has to be sent in every time you want to switch tuning. You can just plug your computer into the hydra for easy tuning changes.
Well I dunno what dyno's you're used to but this is a Dynojet which is pretty much the industry standard in dyno's. These are SAE corrected numbers of course which are also the industry standard of comparison. I don't give a crap about the whole "uncorrected is real blah blah blah" talk. Everyone claims that some dyno's are "heartbreakers" but I've been on many of dyno's with many vehicles and they all read about about the same with 20hp or so as long as the correction factor is same then it's apples to apples.












