Looking for some advice
LivingLarge, that black one is gone. I've called on it already. That's now the second sunroofed X I've lost this week.
I'm 6'4" tall. I really enjoy having glass above me. I had my perfect truck picked out, seller sold it from me on Monday even after I had my aunt go and look at it. Deal was all set, waiting on him to send the P&S the loan is approved and waiting.
https://annapolis.craigslist.org/cto...722785085.html
What about this rig. Had the engine replaced and appears to have been fully fixed going in.
https://baltimore.craigslist.org/cto...737873840.html
Or this super clean last 7.3. The only thing for me is it being an XLT. But man 66k miles.
https://maine.craigslist.org/cto/d/2...720478099.html
This one is close to me. miles a little higher than I wanted to start with, but good upgrades. Waiting to hear what "warranties" it has. Always worry about rust.
https://nh.craigslist.org/cto/d/2003...721760838.html
This one is close. Looks good. But an '03. What questions to ask? Miles little higher than I wanted.
Doesnt the V-10 have the same transmission as the 7.3? Even through '05?
I have no issue with the V-10. I loved our 5.4. It towed excellent. Like said before gearing makes all the difference. And the 6R80 is a phenomenal transmission. We could tow at 65-70 mph all the time even going through Connecticut. I just wanted something bigger and sturdier than an expedition, I think the independent rear suspension gave a little swagger when towing.
Also the 4.30 gears makes it equivalent to diesel towing, but really saps the fuel at speed.
Buying the X opens the door to getting my tractor, towing horse trailers, dump trailers etc. it's been perfectly made clear that the New platinum tri-coat limited expedition was not doing dirty work.
Keep the the thoughts coming.
Matt
http://atcm.co/S2PVDP/1d987b96
here is a really nice '03. Its white which I'm not usually drawn too. It's immaculate. I talked to the guy today and it really is a garage queen. Hardly seen rain as it is.
Now on motor is all original except turbo was replaced and injectors replaced before he bought it in 2007 when it had 50,000 miles. He's had to do no engine repairs. BUT. The check engine light is on, needs an EGR valve. He was waiting to let whoever bought decide if they wanted to replace or delete.
What at are the thoughts on this one? And which way would you go?
Thanks again,
Matt
Your EGR may need a simple cleaning but in the case of the 6.0 it probably needs a $7000 egr cooler-head gasket refurb because that is what those motors do.
what would I do ? I’d waste my money on hookers and blow before flushing it down the toilet on that excursion. seriously, if you are going to condider a 6.0 you need to br willing to spend money you can afford to lose.
injectors and a turbo with less then 50,000 miles should be your red flag....... that is easily $6000 worth of repairs done to a motor that should have gone 200,000 without needed those repairs.
Your EGR may need a simple cleaning but in the case of the 6.0 it probably needs a $7000 egr cooler-head gasket refurb because that is what those motors do.
what would I do ? I’d waste my money on hookers and blow before flushing it down the toilet on that excursion. seriously, if you are going to condider a 6.0 you need to br willing to spend money you can afford to lose.
How are injectors and a turbo a red flag???
The truck is ridiculously well maintained and hasn't had any real problems aside from the injectors and turbo.
Injectors are common if the fuel pump failed. That happened to mine in 2008, the pump failed and took 4 injectors with it, the PO didnt' want to replace the other 4 that were allegedly fine, so I got to. In Matt's case, all 8 injectors sound like they were replaced. That being said, provided the fuel pump is in good shape and the blue fuel spring was installed at the time or even now, he won't have a problem with injectors especially since they're the revised version of the injectors.
Turbo- Common if the truck sits, the truck has VERY low miles which says the first owner and the previous owner didn't drive the truck much. The most recent owner, used it as a vacation vehicle, so that says that it isn't driven much hence it's "Cream Puff" condition.
EGR Valve- Maintenance item. More often than not, it may just need to be cleaned.
The PO has had to do ZERO engine repairs since then, so I imagine Matt won't have to do much aside from maintenance on this truck.
More often than not, these trucks don't need a head gasket job which often runs anywhere between $4500 and $5000. One of the main reasons you need a head gasket job is because it's tuned or the EGR cooler failed and lifted the heads. Even so, there are better built solutions for the EGR cooler so you won't have that problem again. The most anyone has to do is install a few revised parts the truck will run. On a 2003 truck: Blue fuel spring, revised feed and drain tubes for the turbo, clean a few sensors, keep up on regular maintenance and the truck will run and provide mile after mile of trouble free service.
THE MOST Matt may have to do to this truck is an oil cooler if it still has the original coolant and it wasn't properly flushed every 50K; However, given how well this truck is maintained, I doubt that is the case.
I understand your disdain for the 6.0 because it's burned a lot of people and it's got bad rap. However, I've looked through your thread history as well as your posts and you've never owned one or had much experience other than what you've read. Given the aforementioned, you don't have room to bad mouth the 6.0.
http://atcm.co/S2PVDP/1d987b96
here is a really nice '03. Its white which I'm not usually drawn too. It's immaculate. I talked to the guy today and it really is a garage queen. Hardly seen rain as it is.
Now on motor is all original except turbo was replaced and injectors replaced before he bought it in 2007 when it had 50,000 miles. He's had to do no engine repairs. BUT. The check engine light is on, needs an EGR valve. He was waiting to let whoever bought decide if they wanted to replace or delete.
What at are the thoughts on this one? And which way would you go?
Thanks again,
Matt
The 2003 trucks are nothing to be afraid of. Aside from the HPOP, they didn't have HPO issues. Even so, if you had to replace the pump, Dieselsite makes a replacement that will outperform the stock pump and is guaranteed not to be DOA or have the issues the stock pump had. 2003 trucks also had a better cam that kept more air in the cylinders rather than the 2004+ cams that kept more exhaust in the cylinders. They also had a larger 59mm turbo as opposed to the 2004.5+ turbos that were as small as 56mm. It might not seem like much, but it makes a difference in airflow.
The 2003 trucks got a bad rap because they were the first. They were the victims of quality control issues and they were the victims of unstable programming. It wasn't until mid to late 2004 going into 2005 that quality control issues subsided and programming was ironed out.
Bottom line: The truck is a sound investment especially if the receipts back up the owners claims of regular maintenance.
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
So yes - owning a 6.0 demands diligent maintenance but I think when it comes to you yelling UNCLE on the 6.0 every time it is mentioned, well - that is how we read it. For the most part though, you do provide wonderful insights but when it comes to 6.0 discussions we know your history of experience and we respect that. Others provide more insightful information on that particular engine.
There are good ones and there are bad ones, I know, I've seen them and have been able to resurrect some of them to a healthy condition. Some of them just didn't leave the factory put together well or correctly.
A good clean rust free body is first and most important consideration- next engine.


















