6.7L Power Stroke Diesel 2011-current Ford Powerstroke 6.7 L turbo diesel engine

Drivers side battery cable,,,,,nightmare??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 08-23-2018, 07:14 AM
The Bone's Avatar
The Bone
The Bone is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Livermore Ca.
Posts: 2,309
Received 229 Likes on 165 Posts
I inspect my batteries every month. The first sign of corrosion means the battery is junk. Sure it still has life in it but ti's leaking and then you have problems like this. Sure it's hard to replace a battery that looks ok and only a little corrosion on the terminal but a battery should never leak. I had to replace one of my batteries because the hold down was corroded No apparent leak could be seen and it was odd that it would corrode there. Had battery replaced along with new hold down and no more corrosion.
 
  #17  
Old 08-23-2018, 10:53 AM
U9000's Avatar
U9000
U9000 is offline
Tuned
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 286
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by The Bone
I inspect my batteries every month. The first sign of corrosion means the battery is junk. Sure it still has life in it but ti's leaking and then you have problems like this. Sure it's hard to replace a battery that looks ok and only a little corrosion on the terminal but a battery should never leak. I had to replace one of my batteries because the hold down was corroded No apparent leak could be seen and it was odd that it would corrode there. Had battery replaced along with new hold down and no more corrosion.
As an aside to this, if you run a battery tender and only hook it to 1 battery, it will do the same thing as noted above. The battery the tender is hooked to will off gas and the hold down plate will corrode. You have to make a pigtail to allow the tender to connect to both batteries to prevent this from happening.
 
  #18  
Old 08-23-2018, 11:29 AM
nuctrooper's Avatar
nuctrooper
nuctrooper is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 899
Received 74 Likes on 36 Posts
Originally Posted by U9000
As an aside to this, if you run a battery tender and only hook it to 1 battery, it will do the same thing as noted above. The battery the tender is hooked to will off gas and the hold down plate will corrode. You have to make a pigtail to allow the tender to connect to both batteries to prevent this from happening.
What? The batteries ARE connected - directly - by a 0 gage heavy duty cable. You think adding a 14 gage pigtail is going to make any electrical difference? none at all. Because our batteries are permanently wired in parallel by heavy gage wire, you can treat them electrically as one single battery.
 
  #19  
Old 08-23-2018, 02:01 PM
U9000's Avatar
U9000
U9000 is offline
Tuned
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 286
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by nuctrooper
What? The batteries ARE connected - directly - by a 0 gage heavy duty cable. You think adding a 14 gage pigtail is going to make any electrical difference? none at all. Because our batteries are permanently wired in parallel by heavy gage wire, you can treat them electrically as one single battery.
All I can tell you is that when I had the pigtail connected to only 1 battery in both my 7.3 and my 6.7, the battery it was connected to off gassed enough to cause corrosion, with the 6.7 doing more than the 7.3. Once I spilt the tender pigtail to go to both batteries, I haven't had any more issues with corrosion and I have not yet changed out batteries. So I can only figure out that charging the "far" battery through the "close" battery caused the "close" battery to become charged first and then off gas while charging through to the "far" battery. YMMV. This is only what I've seen.
 
  #20  
Old 08-23-2018, 04:42 PM
lynnmor's Avatar
lynnmor
lynnmor is offline
More Turbo
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 557
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Originally Posted by U9000
All I can tell you is that when I had the pigtail connected to only 1 battery in both my 7.3 and my 6.7, the battery it was connected to off gassed enough to cause corrosion, with the 6.7 doing more than the 7.3. Once I spilt the tender pigtail to go to both batteries, I haven't had any more issues with corrosion and I have not yet changed out batteries. So I can only figure out that charging the "far" battery through the "close" battery caused the "close" battery to become charged first and then off gas while charging through to the "far" battery. YMMV. This is only what I've seen.
You are correct, RV owners have known this for years. Likewise the close battery will discharge faster than the other one. That very small resistance in even heavy cables is the problem. A battery charger should go to the negative of one battery and the positive of the other.

 
  #21  
Old 08-24-2018, 02:23 PM
Boaterguy's Avatar
Boaterguy
Boaterguy is offline
Laughing Gas
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Middle TN
Posts: 782
Received 42 Likes on 34 Posts
Talked to my service advisor today.
Batteries are not covered by ESP extended warranty.

Since the battery is what caused the clamp and cable failure, it is also not covered. ($#&@#)! I would be on the hook for the cables, installed, for around 500 clams.

Looks like I am going to the battery store and repairing the cable myself. I think motorcraft batteries are junk, and will spend that $500 on a pair of optima's instead.
 

Last edited by Boaterguy; 08-24-2018 at 02:25 PM. Reason: Mispelling
  #22  
Old 08-25-2018, 09:02 AM
tsedgar's Avatar
tsedgar
tsedgar is offline
Hawkerpilot05
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: MN
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Boaterguy
Talked to my service advisor today.
Batteries are not covered by ESP extended warranty.

Since the battery is what caused the clamp and cable failure, it is also not covered. ($#&@#)! I would be on the hook for the cables, installed, for around 500 clams.

Looks like I am going to the battery store and repairing the cable myself. I think motorcraft batteries are junk, and will spend that $500 on a pair of optima's instead.
I am surprised the Ford ESP didn't cover this. We had the same issue in my wife's Explorer. The dealer covered the positive batter cable replacement but not the batteries. They did allow me to replace the battery myself after they did the cable.
 
  #23  
Old 08-25-2018, 07:06 PM
kper05's Avatar
kper05
kper05 is offline
Lead Driver

Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,595
Received 75 Likes on 60 Posts
I didn't have good luck with the OE Motorcraft's either. Those leaked everywhere on top but failed before any significant damage to the brackets or cables. My second set were DieHard Platinum AGM group 65's that made it 47 months and went with Interstate MTP-65's for this third set.
 
  #24  
Old 08-26-2018, 01:33 AM
lynnmor's Avatar
lynnmor
lynnmor is offline
More Turbo
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 557
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
My original Motorcraft batteries are seven years, eight months old with no corrosion or signs of failure yet.
 
  #25  
Old 08-28-2018, 02:03 PM
wh-7's Avatar
wh-7
wh-7 is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I had a battery corrode on my F150 and my dealer replaced the battery at no charge to me. It was about 4 years old at the time.
But I have taken quite a few vehicles there. That might have something to do with it.
 
  #26  
Old 08-28-2018, 02:57 PM
Boaterguy's Avatar
Boaterguy
Boaterguy is offline
Laughing Gas
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Middle TN
Posts: 782
Received 42 Likes on 34 Posts
Well my truck has the ESP and they still say not covered
when I pulled the battery out, you could see acid bubbling up from a small pin hole next to the positive terminal.

By this time, I just needed the truck on the road, so 2 new batteries and 2 gauge copper butt splice and all is good.
 
  #27  
Old 08-29-2018, 08:24 AM
The Bone's Avatar
The Bone
The Bone is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Livermore Ca.
Posts: 2,309
Received 229 Likes on 165 Posts
This is the reason i don't buy a ESP. If I bought a used car than i would buy one but they don't cover much. It looks good on paper but for the most part the things they cover just dontr brake. With a used car you never know how the previous owner treated this car.
 
  #28  
Old 08-29-2018, 08:54 AM
toddb1's Avatar
toddb1
toddb1 is offline
Mountain Pass
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My 2015 ate the cable as well, I find it odd it's always the drivers side battery. I was able to salvage the end and went with agm batteries.
 
  #29  
Old 08-29-2018, 12:47 PM
Nipperdog's Avatar
Nipperdog
Nipperdog is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: The Sunshine State
Posts: 826
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
+1 for the Anti Corrosion battery Terminal Spray. Here is A Shot of my Stock 2016 Batteries. You can see some moisture near the Vents but no Corrosion.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mono570
1999 to 2016 Super Duty
5
10-14-2018 07:58 AM
hotweekend
1999 to 2016 Super Duty
3
05-29-2015 06:49 PM
Brooks Rowell
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
3
03-07-2014 10:15 AM
Mike04ranger
1983 - 2012 Ranger & B-Series
13
01-19-2011 09:43 AM
95 Snake
1978 - 1996 Big Bronco
2
10-26-2005 03:06 PM



Quick Reply: Drivers side battery cable,,,,,nightmare??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:31 AM.