Notices
1968-Present E-Series Van/Cutaway/Chassis Econolines. E150, E250, E350, E450 and E550

Downshifting vs. braking

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 14, 2018 | 07:35 PM
  #16  
Im50fast's Avatar
Im50fast
Cargo Master
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 3,087
Likes: 24
From: Central Florida
Originally Posted by Mark Kovalsky
Yes, it was. But it sure beats what could have happened,

Actually, I knew what was going to happen. It first did it at about 15 MPH, then worked my way up to 80 MPH. And I wasn't just screwing around, I was on a test track in a test vehicle.
risking “not your” money on the possible damage


i love your stories Mark
 
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2018 | 08:54 PM
  #17  
Mark Kovalsky's Avatar
Mark Kovalsky
Frmr Ford Trans Engr
25 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 3
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 24,714
Likes: 2,639
From: SE Florida
That's what you do with test vehicles. Plus my boss assigned me to do this, and he knew what the outcome was going to be.
 
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2018 | 09:46 AM
  #18  
Nothing Special's Avatar
Nothing Special
Lead Driver
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,006
Likes: 72
From: Roseville, MN
Originally Posted by Im50fast
.... i love your stories Mark
Originally Posted by Mark Kovalsky
That's what you do with test vehicles. Plus my boss assigned me to do this, and he knew what the outcome was going to be.
I worked for GM for a couple years in the '80s. There were a lot of people with good stories! One that this reminds me of was my boss telling me about when he was a new engineer being assigned to to a trans test where he put it in gear, put his foot on the floor and then after moving about 30' forward slammed it into reverse without lifting his foot. Backed up to the starting spot and slammed it back into drive and keep repeating.

He thought that sounded like a really fun test to run!

Within one or two shifts it broke the tires loose, so after that he was just rocking back and forth, looking out the side window to see his markers, in a cloud of tire smoke.

When the test was over he staggered out of the car and puked, understanding why the more experienced engineer had "allowed" the newbie to run this test!
 
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2018 | 09:33 PM
  #19  
Mark Kovalsky's Avatar
Mark Kovalsky
Frmr Ford Trans Engr
25 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 3
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 24,714
Likes: 2,639
From: SE Florida
We called that the rock cycling test. GM ran theirs on dry pavement, we had a pit filled with soapy water to simulate ice and snow. The test was to simulate a customer that is stuck in the snow and trying to rock it out. That test was no fun at all.
 
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2018 | 06:40 AM
  #20  
wiskeyVI's Avatar
wiskeyVI
Elder User
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 699
Likes: 5
From: S. Illinois
It's amazing to me that they tested for such things. I've just never considered it.

Aome these would have made great "Rat Fink" type of bubble gum cards!
 
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2018 | 06:58 AM
  #21  
Im50fast's Avatar
Im50fast
Cargo Master
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 3,087
Likes: 24
From: Central Florida
Mark did you ever do a high rev neutral drop test?
thats another one I’ve always dreamed about
 
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2018 | 06:42 AM
  #22  
jeffreyclay's Avatar
jeffreyclay
Elder User
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 545
Likes: 1
From: Bedford, Va
Originally Posted by Im50fast
Mark did you ever do a high rev neutral drop test?
thats another one I’ve always dreamed about
If you're talking about hi rev in neutral and dropping into drive, well I tried it once in 1974. I was driving a stock 64 Galaxie with a FMX transmission and a 352ci engine. I had just installed a new set of Dunlop HR78-14 tires and the pavement was blistering hot on that 100 degree summer day. Traction would not be a problem. Myself and 3 guys who owned British sports cars were to drag race the length of a closed off shopping mall parking lot. I had the tach bouncing between 3-4K when I slapped it into drive. Initially it felt like I had been rear-ended, then a loud, repetitive metallic banging noise. I shut it down and got out to inspect the situation. The driveshaft had been wrung in half. The front section, still in the tailshaft, had spun beating the tunnel in the floorpan. That was the banging noise. The rear section of the driveshaft had rolled out from under the car with the pinion gear still attached! There was a hole in the front of the 9" rear end still weeping gear oil on the pavement. Scattered about were chunks of cast iron and a number of ring gear teeth. By the following weekend I'd made a visit to a junkyard and gotten another driveshaft and hog's head. After installation the car drove fine for years with no apparent damage to the transmission. (and they said Torque Flights were the toughest, Ha!)
 
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2018 | 06:52 AM
  #23  
baddad457's Avatar
baddad457
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 11,141
Likes: 25
From: south louisiana
Originally Posted by jeffreyclay
If you're talking about hi rev in neutral and dropping into drive, well I tried it once in 1974. I was driving a stock 64 Galaxie with a FMX transmission and a 352ci engine. I had just installed a new set of Dunlop HR78-14 tires and the pavement was blistering hot on that 100 degree summer day. Traction would not be a problem. Myself and 3 guys who owned British sports cars were to drag race the length of a closed off shopping mall parking lot. I had the tach bouncing between 3-4K when I slapped it into drive. Initially it felt like I had been rear-ended, then a loud, repetitive metallic banging noise. I shut it down and got out to inspect the situation. The driveshaft had been wrung in half. The front section, still in the tailshaft, had spun beating the tunnel in the floorpan. That was the banging noise. The rear section of the driveshaft had rolled out from under the car with the pinion gear still attached! There was a hole in the front of the 9" rear end still weeping gear oil on the pavement. Scattered about were chunks of cast iron and a number of ring gear teeth. By the following weekend I'd made a visit to a junkyard and gotten another driveshaft and hog's head. After installation the car drove fine for years with no apparent damage to the transmission. (and they said Torque Flights were the toughest, Ha!)
A few years back I bought a 64 Merc Monterey for parts. The drivetrain was complete so we woke up the 390 under the hood from a 7 year slumber. Brakes didn't work (all drums) but we drove it around the back yard using the old MX transmission for brakes by slamming it into reverse. Never apparently hurt the MX. Everyone claimed the FMX and MX weren't strong enough for high performance work but Ford chose the FMX to put behind the Clevlands and the Maverick Grabbers and Comet GT's in the 70's. Then later morphed it into the AOD
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-2

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-4

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-5

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-8

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Jun 18, 2018 | 10:11 AM
  #24  
jeffreyclay's Avatar
jeffreyclay
Elder User
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 545
Likes: 1
From: Bedford, Va
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by baddad457
Everyone claimed the FMX and MX weren't strong enough for high performance work but Ford chose the FMX to put behind the Clevlands and the Maverick Grabbers and Comet GT's in the 70's. Then later morphed it into the AOD
Ford may has missed that message. In the late '60's if you ordered the Police Interceptor package with the 428 it came with a FMX. Hey Baddad, I once had a calendar that featured special vehicles on the monthly pages. One had pictured a 1968 Mercury Marauder with light-bar and full police package. The caption read, "Imagine the surprise of the speeding Porsche owner traveling at 130mph and the Mercury police car he sees in his rearview is closing on him!" The 68 Merc PI had the distinction of being the fastest production police car made.(at that time)


1968 Mercury Monterey Police Interceptor w/ 428ci and FMX transmission.
 
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2018 | 03:35 PM
  #25  
baddad457's Avatar
baddad457
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 11,141
Likes: 25
From: south louisiana
Originally Posted by jeffreyclay
Ford may has missed that message. In the late '60's if you ordered the Police Interceptor package with the 428 it came with a FMX. Hey Baddad, I once had a calendar that featured special vehicles on the monthly pages. One had pictured a 1968 Mercury Marauder with light-bar and full police package. The caption read, "Imagine the surprise of the speeding Porsche owner traveling at 130mph and the Mercury police car he sees in his rearview is closing on him!" The 68 Merc PI had the distinction of being the fastest production police car made.(at that time)


1968 Mercury Monterey Police Interceptor w/ 428ci and FMX transmission.
I had a 68 Merc Monterey 2 dr fastback for a few years. Premium fuel 390 2 bbl backed with a C6 and 2.75 rear which I replaced with a 3.70 geared chunk. Rebuilt the 58,000 mile 390 gave it a Crane 272 Energizer and topped it with a 428PI intake and 3310 Holley. FPA headers and dual exhaust. Ran 15 sec 1/4's. My kid and his friends nick named it the USS Monterey cause it was a Heavy Cruiser.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Evergreen53
Big Block V8 - 385 Series (6.1/370, 7.0/429, 7.5/460)
0
Apr 17, 2017 12:17 PM
bottrot
1968-Present E-Series Van/Cutaway/Chassis
2
Jan 28, 2015 02:42 PM
alumcanTandThd
1968-Present E-Series Van/Cutaway/Chassis
24
Mar 19, 2014 10:39 PM
Tomm
Escape & Escape Hybrid
3
Feb 24, 2010 07:33 PM
RangerPilot
1983 - 2012 Ranger & B-Series
18
Nov 21, 2005 12:09 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:08 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-1
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-3
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-4
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-5
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-7
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE