Temp Gauge Swich
Thread Starter
|
Mountain Pass
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 114
Likes: 2
From: Saint Marks
Temp Gauge Swich
OK. I was driving my 1996 Ford Bronco 302 the other day and my temp started to read towards the hot side, and then came down, back up, then down. Thought my thermostat was sticking or I was over heating, but the temp to the computer was well in range from the other switch. On the one that goes to the temp gauge, I have a tool that fools the gauge that it is a sending unit, and the gauge stayed in the normal range as it should...gauge good! switch right? replaced with three different after market sending units, and same problem, and all of them had around 350 ohms resistance, and Ford tech manual said this needs to be 74ohms, but the motorcraft sender was out of stock at Ford. Got it yesterday, but before I put it in it read 256 ohms, but put it in anyway. and did the same thing. Engine is not overheating and computer reads normal. What in the world am I missing ?
Fleet Owner
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 20,786
Likes: 1,751
From: Kentucky
I have been watching this thread to see if someone smarter than I could answer your questions. It looks like Ford used the same temperature sender for many years. I also looked through various years' EVTM manuals to see that same value listed (74 to 9.7 ohms). From my research I believe those values are for normal engine operating temperatures, not room temperature to engine overheating.
It takes some reading in between the lines, but this thread has some real world values for a typical Ford temperature sending unit and where the temperature gauge was pointing: Ford Mustang Forums : Corral.net Mustang Forum - View Single Post - Randy, I need your help please, I think my local Ford Parts Dept is clueless.
Based on those results I would say the sender(s) are okay.
I know you stated you used a tool to simulate the sender, but what were the resistance values used throughout the gauge range?
It takes some reading in between the lines, but this thread has some real world values for a typical Ford temperature sending unit and where the temperature gauge was pointing: Ford Mustang Forums : Corral.net Mustang Forum - View Single Post - Randy, I need your help please, I think my local Ford Parts Dept is clueless.
Based on those results I would say the sender(s) are okay.
I know you stated you used a tool to simulate the sender, but what were the resistance values used throughout the gauge range?
Thread Starter
|
Mountain Pass
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 114
Likes: 2
From: Saint Marks
I have been watching this thread to see if someone smarter than I could answer your questions. It looks like Ford used the same temperature sender for many years. I also looked through various years' EVTM manuals to see that same value listed (74 to 9.7 ohms). From my research I believe those values are for normal engine operating temperatures, not room temperature to engine overheating.
It takes some reading in between the lines, but this thread has some real world values for a typical Ford temperature sending unit and where the temperature gauge was pointing: Ford Mustang Forums : Corral.net Mustang Forum - View Single Post - Randy, I need your help please, I think my local Ford Parts Dept is clueless.
Based on those results I would say the sender(s) are okay.
I know you stated you used a tool to simulate the sender, but what were the resistance values used throughout the gauge range?
It takes some reading in between the lines, but this thread has some real world values for a typical Ford temperature sending unit and where the temperature gauge was pointing: Ford Mustang Forums : Corral.net Mustang Forum - View Single Post - Randy, I need your help please, I think my local Ford Parts Dept is clueless.
Based on those results I would say the sender(s) are okay.
I know you stated you used a tool to simulate the sender, but what were the resistance values used throughout the gauge range?
Cargo Master
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 3,182
Likes: 15
From: Somewhere n North America
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
|
Mountain Pass
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 114
Likes: 2
From: Saint Marks
no, we were told they were trying to standardize sending units for multiple applications. I am going to put a resister in-line but am gonna try to find a NOS sender or pull one from engine at pick and pull to test theory
FTE Stories
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)
Brett Foote
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies
Joe Kucinski
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make
Brett Foote
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!
Michael S. Palmer
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home
Verdad Gallardo
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!
Joe Kucinski
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?
Brett Foote
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!
Michael S. Palmer
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!
Joe Kucinski
4wd Low
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: IL
I had this problem years ago with a ford car. The temp gauge would vary with the amount of electrical load, i.e. lights, A/C fan speed. I finally found the body ground was not good and there was a ground potential difference between the block and chassis. Once I cleaned the connections everything was OK.
Thread Starter
|
Mountain Pass
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 114
Likes: 2
From: Saint Marks
I had this problem years ago with a ford car. The temp gauge would vary with the amount of electrical load, i.e. lights, A/C fan speed. I finally found the body ground was not good and there was a ground potential difference between the block and chassis. Once I cleaned the connections everything was OK.
Cargo Master
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 3,182
Likes: 15
From: Somewhere n North America
Are you going to try adding the parallel resistor ?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hharris8
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
22
Aug 5, 2016 04:00 PM