Temp Gauge Swich - Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums

Notices
1978 - 1996 Big Bronco  
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Temp Gauge Swich

Reply

 
 
 
  #1  
Old 04-27-2018, 02:54 PM
tassmannn's Avatar
tassmannn
tassmannn is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Tallahassee
Posts: 97
tassmannn is starting off with a positive reputation.
Question Temp Gauge Swich

OK. I was driving my 1996 Ford Bronco 302 the other day and my temp started to read towards the hot side, and then came down, back up, then down. Thought my thermostat was sticking or I was over heating, but the temp to the computer was well in range from the other switch. On the one that goes to the temp gauge, I have a tool that fools the gauge that it is a sending unit, and the gauge stayed in the normal range as it should...gauge good! switch right? replaced with three different after market sending units, and same problem, and all of them had around 350 ohms resistance, and Ford tech manual said this needs to be 74ohms, but the motorcraft sender was out of stock at Ford. Got it yesterday, but before I put it in it read 256 ohms, but put it in anyway. and did the same thing. Engine is not overheating and computer reads normal. What in the world am I missing ?
 
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-02-2018, 12:50 PM
tassmannn's Avatar
tassmannn
tassmannn is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Tallahassee
Posts: 97
tassmannn is starting off with a positive reputation.
Wow...not one response. I thought for sure a Ford tech would have an answer on this one LOL
 
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-12-2018, 12:41 AM
black & blue 78/9
black & blue 78/9 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Cheyenne, Wy
Posts: 148
black & blue 78/9 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Bump bump bump
 
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-12-2018, 10:29 PM
McLeod's Avatar
McLeod
McLeod is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,233
McLeod is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.McLeod is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Maybe you have air in your coolant system.
 
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-17-2018, 02:22 PM
rla2005's Avatar
rla2005
rla2005 is online now
Post Fiend
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 14,088
rla2005 has much to be proud ofrla2005 has much to be proud ofrla2005 has much to be proud ofrla2005 has much to be proud ofrla2005 has much to be proud ofrla2005 has much to be proud ofrla2005 has much to be proud ofrla2005 has much to be proud ofrla2005 has much to be proud of
I have been watching this thread to see if someone smarter than I could answer your questions. It looks like Ford used the same temperature sender for many years. I also looked through various years' EVTM manuals to see that same value listed (74 to 9.7 ohms). From my research I believe those values are for normal engine operating temperatures, not room temperature to engine overheating.

It takes some reading in between the lines, but this thread has some real world values for a typical Ford temperature sending unit and where the temperature gauge was pointing: Ford Mustang Forums : Corral.net Mustang Forum - View Single Post - Randy, I need your help please, I think my local Ford Parts Dept is clueless.

Based on those results I would say the sender(s) are okay.

I know you stated you used a tool to simulate the sender, but what were the resistance values used throughout the gauge range?
 
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-17-2018, 09:24 PM
tassmannn's Avatar
tassmannn
tassmannn is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Tallahassee
Posts: 97
tassmannn is starting off with a positive reputation.
Originally Posted by rla2005 View Post
I have been watching this thread to see if someone smarter than I could answer your questions. It looks like Ford used the same temperature sender for many years. I also looked through various years' EVTM manuals to see that same value listed (74 to 9.7 ohms). From my research I believe those values are for normal engine operating temperatures, not room temperature to engine overheating.

It takes some reading in between the lines, but this thread has some real world values for a typical Ford temperature sending unit and where the temperature gauge was pointing: Ford Mustang Forums : Corral.net Mustang Forum - View Single Post - Randy, I need your help please, I think my local Ford Parts Dept is clueless.

Based on those results I would say the sender(s) are okay.

I know you stated you used a tool to simulate the sender, but what were the resistance values used throughout the gauge range?
Very good comments. Ford doesn't have an answer for this as these newer indicators seem to be generic for a variety of applications. They show exactly what you say, but when we test these senders, they have a higher ohm rating on them cold( around 174). What we are going to do is put a 100 ohm resister in-line...stay tuned
 
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-19-2018, 06:46 PM
vjsimone's Avatar
vjsimone
vjsimone is online now
Old-Timer
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mall Bay, Newfoundland
Posts: 2,130
vjsimone is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.vjsimone is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Is the resistance in the wire to the sender changing ?
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.