Notices
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Dentsides Ford Truck
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Moser

Failed Emissions test again. Help please.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 26, 2018 | 07:08 AM
  #16  
1979-F250's Avatar
1979-F250
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Thanks for all the replies. I know I can get it to pass on HC's with the jet and rod change. I'm just not sure if I can lean it out enough to get it to pass on CO%. I do believe that here in CO, the vehicle just has to pass at idle or pass at 2500 RPM on CO% to pass the test. I do not believe it has to pass both at idle and 2500 RPM for that part of the test. Has anyone tried putting Iso-Heat in to get it to pass since that is basically just alcohol?

Yes it does have the big 351C 4V heads on it and a cam, but it has a Edelbrock Performer intake for the 400cid on it. Which that intake is acting as a restriction in the air flow and the cam is a mild/stock replacement cam from Edelbrock.

Another idle trick is to set it up 50 RPM on the linkage, then pull it back down where it's supposed to be with the mix screws - "lean idle drop", I believe is the term.
Jakehan - I think i will try that as well.
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2018 | 08:38 AM
  #17  
Aaron-71's Avatar
Aaron-71
Logistics Pro
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 4,436
Likes: 19
From: Regina, Saskatchewan
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by yardbird
Between the 750 carb, Cleveland 4 bbl heads, and the cam, I don't know if you can ever get it down where it needs to be.

I owned a 351 Cleveland 4 bbl way back in the day when it was practically new. All stock, the exhaust would burn your eyes coming out the tail pipes.
Lol why were you sticking your face that close to the exhaust?
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2018 | 09:32 AM
  #18  
4x4slik's Avatar
4x4slik
Elder User
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 898
Likes: 3
From: Chillicothe, IA
My first suggestion is to move. But if that is not an option, then try a 2bbl. You can get a 2150 from Ford Truck Carburetors for $180. A 2bbl - 4bbl converter is $30. Or find a used 2150 and rebuild it, should have less than $50 in it. Or put your carb on CL to trade for a 600cfm 4bbl. As stated by a bunch of folks here, not sure you will ever make the numbers with a too big carb on it.
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2018 | 03:17 PM
  #19  
77F100stepside's Avatar
77F100stepside
Cross-Country
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 64
Likes: 1
From: Ontario Canada
I had an engine with a similar setup. 351c 4v edelbrock, intake, aluminum heads, long tube headers, large cam etc. It had a 650 edelbrock carb on it. Like most said its probably the size of carb. The 2bbl ones that are stock for the engines are cheap $150-200 compared to a new 600-650cfm 4bbl. That would probably help. Nut sure about much else. Here in Ontario old vehicles don't need to go for e test.

Reman stock 2bbl $200 https://www.summitracing.com/parts/u...view/make/ford
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2018 | 11:33 PM
  #20  
1979-F250's Avatar
1979-F250
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Thanks again to everyone for the replies and input. Thought I'd post an update. Several people seemed to be interested if it will pass. I decided to change the jets and rods in the carb. I changed the metering rods to 071x047, left main jets at .104 and changed secondary jets to .098. I also advanced the timing a few more degrees, set idle at about 950rpm, put the mixture screws at 3/4 of a turn out from fully closed, have 15hg at idle and added some Iso-Heet to the gas tank. The secondaries are still disconnected.

I took it in for another test and got the complete opposite of what I was expecting. I'll give prior results first as a comparison.
Previous test:
HC PPM: 2500 RPM - 347.2, Idle - 498.2, Limit - 400
CO%: 2500 RPM - 7.82, Idle - 5.86, Limit 1.50
Today's test:
HC PPM: 2500 RPM - 701.8, Idle - 621.1, Limit - 400
CO%: 2500 RPM - 0.28, Idle - 0.21, Limit - 1.50

As you can all see, It is now running too lean with the 750 carb on it. This result was much to my surprise when I got it. I was expecting HC to pass and CO% to still be high or just barely passing. I will soon (within the next couple days) hook the secondaries back up, turn the mixture screws to 1 1/4 turns out from fully closed, retard timing a couple degrees and go get my free retest and hope that is the last test i have to take for at least a year,.
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2018 | 06:22 AM
  #21  
willowbilly3's Avatar
willowbilly3
Post Fiend
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,209
Likes: 12
From: Black Hills of SD
Originally Posted by yardbird
Between the 750 carb, Cleveland 4 bbl heads, and the cam, I don't know if you can ever get it down where it needs to be.

I owned a 351 Cleveland 4 bbl way back in the day when it was practically new. All stock, the exhaust would burn your eyes coming out the tail pipes.
Burning eyes smell is not rich generally, it is high HC, the product of incomplete combustion more often caused by a lean condition.
If you live where strict emissions standards are in play, you can't run huge carbs and lumpy cams. Get used to it. Have a good tune up shop tune your engine on a 4 gas analyzer, there is no guessing game that can even come close. Even with the mods you have, you should get under 4% CO and 500 ppm HC, although I don't know if that will get you legal.
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2018 | 08:04 PM
  #22  
Jklnhyd's Avatar
Jklnhyd
Postmaster
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,595
Likes: 5
From: Pasadena, Ca
So...you are thinking that you can satisfy an emissions test with all of the equipment that was designed and installed removed, to get the engine down to the required emissions specs, and you are doing this with an engine that has been modified in a general anti-emissions direction?

Seems plausible.
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2018 | 09:17 PM
  #23  
1979-F250's Avatar
1979-F250
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Jklnhyd
So...you are thinking that you can satisfy an emissions test with all of the equipment that was designed and installed removed, to get the engine down to the required emissions specs, and you are doing this with an engine that has been modified in a general anti-emissions direction?

Seems plausible.
Yes I think I can. Most of the emission equipment on vehicles is a joke any way. The emissions equipment on most vehicles restricts and hinders performance so much that it makes them run bad. We will once I take it back how it does. At this point I'm fairly confident its just down to getting the mixture screws and timing at just the right spot. I'm kinda on a mission to show that this engine with these mods, large 750 carb, no emissions components (except 1 cat converter which is needed to pass the visual inspection) can pass the test within the limits allowed. Which, if it does, will support my theory that emissions equipment on cars is no more than a government gimmick for them to get more money.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Jan 27, 2018 | 09:23 PM
  #24  
Tedster9's Avatar
Tedster9
Post Fiend
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 19,311
Likes: 97
From: Waterloo, Iowa
One thing about those idle mixture screws, they are precision cut to trim out the amount of fuel at idle needed for a particular engine. About a 1/16 of a turn will move the AFR a whole point so it's amusing to hear people say "Oh, they are about 3 turns out."
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2018 | 11:11 PM
  #25  
willowbilly3's Avatar
willowbilly3
Post Fiend
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,209
Likes: 12
From: Black Hills of SD
Originally Posted by 1979-F250
Yes I think I can. Most of the emission equipment on vehicles is a joke any way. The emissions equipment on most vehicles restricts and hinders performance so much that it makes them run bad. We will once I take it back how it does. At this point I'm fairly confident its just down to getting the mixture screws and timing at just the right spot. I'm kinda on a mission to show that this engine with these mods, large 750 carb, no emissions components (except 1 cat converter which is needed to pass the visual inspection) can pass the test within the limits allowed. Which, if it does, will support my theory that emissions equipment on cars is no more than a government gimmick for them to get more money.
Yeah, right. Let us know how that works out.
 
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2018 | 01:56 AM
  #26  
75BigBlock's Avatar
75BigBlock
Elder User
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 893
Likes: 5
When I had my '65 Coronet and lived in SLC where emissions testing was required I passed emissions every year. I drove past every station! Woo! Heck, I didn't even legally need seat belts!
 
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2018 | 08:19 PM
  #27  
palmrose2's Avatar
palmrose2
Tuned
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 348
Likes: 2
From: Northern Michigan
Originally Posted by 1979-F250
Yes I think I can. Most of the emission equipment on vehicles is a joke any way. The emissions equipment on most vehicles restricts and hinders performance so much that it makes them run bad. We will once I take it back how it does. At this point I'm fairly confident its just down to getting the mixture screws and timing at just the right spot. I'm kinda on a mission to show that this engine with these mods, large 750 carb, no emissions components (except 1 cat converter which is needed to pass the visual inspection) can pass the test within the limits allowed. Which, if it does, will support my theory that emissions equipment on cars is no more than a government gimmick for them to get more money.
Honda CVCC engine. Very trick in it's day. Passed the government standard with zero add ons. No cat. No air injection. No EGR. No computer. Naturally clean. It used a unique 3 valve head to get there. It basically had no "emissions equipment", and yet the government had no problems with it. You are not sporting anything like Honda's CVCC head. In fact, you are totally in the other direction.

As I said before, good luck.
 
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2018 | 02:46 PM
  #28  
D-rat's Avatar
D-rat
Elder User
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 712
Likes: 1
From: Mesa, AZ
Originally Posted by 1979-F250
Thanks again to everyone for the replies and input. Thought I'd post an update. Several people seemed to be interested if it will pass. I decided to change the jets and rods in the carb. I changed the metering rods to 071x047, left main jets at .104 and changed secondary jets to .098. I also advanced the timing a few more degrees, set idle at about 950rpm, put the mixture screws at 3/4 of a turn out from fully closed, have 15hg at idle and added some Iso-Heet to the gas tank. The secondaries are still disconnected.

I took it in for another test and got the complete opposite of what I was expecting. I'll give prior results first as a comparison.
Previous test:
HC PPM: 2500 RPM - 347.2, Idle - 498.2, Limit - 400
CO%: 2500 RPM - 7.82, Idle - 5.86, Limit 1.50
Today's test:
HC PPM: 2500 RPM - 701.8, Idle - 621.1, Limit - 400
CO%: 2500 RPM - 0.28, Idle - 0.21, Limit - 1.50

As you can all see, It is now running too lean with the 750 carb on it. This result was much to my surprise when I got it. I was expecting HC to pass and CO% to still be high or just barely passing. I will soon (within the next couple days) hook the secondaries back up, turn the mixture screws to 1 1/4 turns out from fully closed, retard timing a couple degrees and go get my free retest and hope that is the last test i have to take for at least a year,.


High HCs is unburnt fuel. You took it to the point of getting a lean misfire at idle is my guess.


Is there any ability to register the truck as a vintage / antique and bypass smog regs? I had a helluva time with mine back in October until I had some carb work done on my 2150, but eventually got it through in good shape. You have a lot of go fast pre smog parts on there that might not ever pass no matter what you do. Maybe consider an EFI kit?
 
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2018 | 10:31 PM
  #29  
boingk's Avatar
boingk
More Turbo
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 559
Likes: 4
From: Australian Outback
You want full atomisation and a complete, even burn to pass emissions of any sort. Down here in Australia we got Cleveland engines from 1970 through 1985 model year so we live and breathe them.

The Performer intake will help you, being a dual-plane, but the biggest killer will be the cat converter... why don't you just get a pair of aftermarket 100 cell cats and install them after the headers? This will help a lot for any sort of emissions testing.

If you want a quick, cheap fix then reset your 750cfm Edelbrock carburettor to factory settings, remove it and put it back in the box. Now fit a 350cfm Holley two-barrel and set it to factory settings - 60 mainjets and 8.5"power valve. Check the float height and idle screws are to factory settings also, this is crucial. You should pass due to the much increased vacuum through the carburettor and subsequentially better fuel atomisation.

Now after the test refit the Edelbrock and keep the 350 until next time you need testing... although this is most likely illegal (state dependant) and you may get caught out with fines etc.

Probably not the advice you wanted to hear, but it will probably help.
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2018 | 09:40 AM
  #30  
1979-F250's Avatar
1979-F250
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
I was able to finally make it back to the emissions place yesterday. I wanted to get there much sooner than that but just didn't work out. First off, I want to thank everyone that gave me positive feedback and suggestions to try. Second, I wanted to post my results from yesterday so that everyone that was curious if I could get it to pass and for those nay say'rs that basically said I had a better chance at winning the lottery could see what my final out come was.

Firstly I thought it would be best if i did a recap on the modifications that are done to the truck so that everyone does not have to scroll back through all the prior posts to find it.
Engine Mods:
Stock air filter housing with air filter about twice as tall as standard air filter, Edelbrock 750 CFM 4 barrel carb, Edelbrock performer 400 intake manifold, 351 4v Cleveland heads, stock 351 4v Cleveland exhaust manifolds, single exhaust (modified y-pipe to adapt to cleveland manifolds) with Flowmaster muffler with 3in piping and turn down tip off back of muffler, 1 Magnaflow cat converter (required to pass visiual insp), gutted air injection pump (had to gut pump because the cleveland heads do not have the air passages in them, so the pump is just a dummy to pass visual insp), mild Edelbrock street/strip cam, full MSD ignition (6AL controller, blaster 2 coil, weighted advance distributor (non-vacuum advance)), 8mm plug wires, Motorcraft platinum plugs, 180 degree t-stat, EGR removed, thermatic system removed and Mallory fuel pump.

Adjustments/things I did to get the final calibration:
87 octane fuel (mid grade here, we are at a mile high above sea level), 10-12 degrees of timing, leanest jets and rods in 750 cfm carb per the Edelbrock tuning guide, disconnected the secondaries, getting about 15 in vacuum and about 860 rpm at idle.

Now the trick I used to get it all dialed in because the traditional method of tuning it with a vacuum gauge and tach just weren't doing the job:
Purchased a wideband UEGO O2 sensor/gauge kit from AEM, installed it and tuned the truck that way to get it as close to the stoichiometric ratio (14.7:1, which is 14.7 lbs of air to 1 lb of gasoline if you didn't know) that I could for before cat converter measurements.

Now as a comparison, here are my previous test results:
HC PPM: 2500 RPM - 701.8, Idle - 621.1, Limit - 400
CO%: 2500 RPM - 0.28, Idle - 0.21, Limit - 1.50

Now attached below is a picture of my final test results from yesterday. Thought a picture would be best to try and limit anyone saying that I just made the results up:

So as you can all see, even here at altitude and with those anti emissions modifications to the truck goes to show that with the right calibration and the will to do so that you can make almost, not all cars, pass the emissions test. So as a recap, the only working piece of emissions equipment on the truck is the aftermarket Magnaflow cat converter. All other emissions equipment has been removed or are just dummy parts to pass the visual inspection. Now time to go get its new plates. Thanks again to everyone that responded to my post with positive feedback. Hope everyone has a good and wonderful weekend.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:32 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE