Im sorry but i am going to have to purchase a RAM
#107
I don’t know that we judge them by options. Some people like to lift their trucks spend money on tires, rims etc., etc. others add a few options that they use and enjoy. For me I would rather have a warm steering wheel, leather seats and some electronics than big tires and rims and I don’t expect anyone to really give a rats other than me. I am sure people who lift there trucks feel the same. I say as long as your paying for it, do what you want its your money.
#108
I don’t know that we judge them by options. Some people like to lift their trucks spend money on tires, rims etc., etc. others add a few options that they use and enjoy. For me I would rather have a warm steering wheel, leather seats and some electronics than big tires and rims and I don’t expect anyone to really give a rats other than me. I am sure people who lift there trucks feel the same. I say as long as your paying for it, do you want its your money.
"You'd be surprised how much it costs to look this cheap!" - Dolly Parton
#109
Is it really hard to get the concept of person preferences? I never understand the sentiment where people are upset about others preferences.
#110
#111
Enjoy your time spent in the shop, constantly failing ball joints that might make it 1 year if you druve less than 10,000 miles, enjoy your drive line always failing, also enjoy there crappy injection pumps, dont forget the front end is garbage. Enjoy your time spent in the shop, thats we're you'll be most, and ill be driving my 93' f150 everywhere. Im only 19, and you can also enjoy slowly going blind grom the cheap screens ram installs, they will slowly make your vision diminish. But remember you wanted a bigger screen at the cost of throwing everything else away.
With all that being said I love my Ford and do not regretting jumping ship.
#112
Not trying to be rude but you have no idea what you are talking about. I just traded my 15 2500 6.7 with 50K miles on it and had a 13 2500 with 20K on it when I traded to the 15. "Some" people have reported problems with ball joints that decided to level their truck beyond 2" in the front, drive lines have been problematic in the Long Beds due to the Center support bearings but that was in the early Rams. There are several people on the cumminsforums with over 300K miles that have been towing with them since day 1 with regular maintenance and the only issues they have reported is water pump issues (which Ram just recalled) All the big three make good trucks it is more of people's personal preference, the reason I jumped ship to a 2017 F250 6.7 was the increase in power, love the new re-design, Ford's powertrain is superior to the 68RFE and the turbo lag in the Ram. Ram says they have 385HP and 930 Torque but only if you buy a 3500 and get the Aisin Trans (which I dont need a one ton). Ram IMO has a WAY better radio than Ford, I had the 5.0 and 8.4N in the Ram and both were superior to the Ford 4.2 and 8" sync.
With all that being said I love my Ford and do not regretting jumping ship.
With all that being said I love my Ford and do not regretting jumping ship.
Sure, IF I was a hot shot who primarily traveled the interstate, I would choose a Ram due to the excellent pulling capability of the Cummins.
But I'm not. I'm a contractor who lives and works on some of the roughest roads in the country.
From an engineering perspective, it's easy to see why the front ends on the Ram have lower expected life.
Instead of what Dana does (their inner c's and knuckles are precision machined by Busche CNC) to have both upper and lower ball joints support the load, AAM instead delegates their Mexican factory to produce an axle that is cheaper. Having a floating kingpin joint means there is no upper precision required. It means the axle is designed to have 100% of the weight on the lower joint, to save them money, and not the end user money.
I've driven a 14 Ram 2500, the joints had 0.2'' of play, (over double the maximum Ram specifies) at just 40k miles. Tires were also feathering at the edges. GM vehicles with their IFS last longer than that in our environment...
#113
I'd have to disagree about Ram's front end. For those who drive on rough surfaces, such as a contractor or utility, the AAM front axle leaves much to be desired.
Sure, IF I was a hot shot who primarily traveled the interstate, I would choose a Ram due to the excellent pulling capability of the Cummins.
But I'm not. I'm a contractor who lives and works on some of the roughest roads in the country.
From an engineering perspective, it's easy to see why the front ends on the Ram have lower expected life.
Instead of what Dana does (their inner c's and knuckles are precision machined by Busche CNC) to have both upper and lower ball joints support the load, AAM instead delegates their Mexican factory to produce an axle that is cheaper. Having a floating kingpin joint means there is no upper precision required. It means the axle is designed to have 100% of the weight on the lower joint, to save them money, and not the end user money.
I've driven a 14 Ram 2500, the joints had 0.2'' of play, (over double the maximum Ram specifies) at just 40k miles. Tires were also feathering at the edges. GM vehicles with their IFS last longer than that in our environment...
Sure, IF I was a hot shot who primarily traveled the interstate, I would choose a Ram due to the excellent pulling capability of the Cummins.
But I'm not. I'm a contractor who lives and works on some of the roughest roads in the country.
From an engineering perspective, it's easy to see why the front ends on the Ram have lower expected life.
Instead of what Dana does (their inner c's and knuckles are precision machined by Busche CNC) to have both upper and lower ball joints support the load, AAM instead delegates their Mexican factory to produce an axle that is cheaper. Having a floating kingpin joint means there is no upper precision required. It means the axle is designed to have 100% of the weight on the lower joint, to save them money, and not the end user money.
I've driven a 14 Ram 2500, the joints had 0.2'' of play, (over double the maximum Ram specifies) at just 40k miles. Tires were also feathering at the edges. GM vehicles with their IFS last longer than that in our environment...
#114
I'd have to disagree about Ram's front end. For those who drive on rough surfaces, such as a contractor or utility, the AAM front axle leaves much to be desired.
Sure, IF I was a hot shot who primarily traveled the interstate, I would choose a Ram due to the excellent pulling capability of the Cummins.
But I'm not. I'm a contractor who lives and works on some of the roughest roads in the country.
From an engineering perspective, it's easy to see why the front ends on the Ram have lower expected life.
Instead of what Dana does (their inner c's and knuckles are precision machined by Busche CNC) to have both upper and lower ball joints support the load, AAM instead delegates their Mexican factory to produce an axle that is cheaper. Having a floating kingpin joint means there is no upper precision required. It means the axle is designed to have 100% of the weight on the lower joint, to save them money, and not the end user money.
I've driven a 14 Ram 2500, the joints had 0.2'' of play, (over double the maximum Ram specifies) at just 40k miles. Tires were also feathering at the edges. GM vehicles with their IFS last longer than that in our environment...
Sure, IF I was a hot shot who primarily traveled the interstate, I would choose a Ram due to the excellent pulling capability of the Cummins.
But I'm not. I'm a contractor who lives and works on some of the roughest roads in the country.
From an engineering perspective, it's easy to see why the front ends on the Ram have lower expected life.
Instead of what Dana does (their inner c's and knuckles are precision machined by Busche CNC) to have both upper and lower ball joints support the load, AAM instead delegates their Mexican factory to produce an axle that is cheaper. Having a floating kingpin joint means there is no upper precision required. It means the axle is designed to have 100% of the weight on the lower joint, to save them money, and not the end user money.
I've driven a 14 Ram 2500, the joints had 0.2'' of play, (over double the maximum Ram specifies) at just 40k miles. Tires were also feathering at the edges. GM vehicles with their IFS last longer than that in our environment...
#115
#116
Around here, the farmers that work their Chevy trucks on the farm have regular problems with keeping wheel bearings in them. My Buddy had them go out on his new Duramax at 36,300 miles. GM refused to replace them under the 36,000 mile warranty. It cost him $700 for new bearings. He's a "GM lifer" so no matter what they do, he'll keep wearing a bow tie.
#117
The obviously you haven’t used the UConnect system. I go by actual usage not what some website said. The UConnect system is faster and the maps are better. The system is just a better all around system. Sync has just gotten to be tolerable with Sync 3. Use each daily and the difference is clear.
Im a ford Guy at heart, but Im not brand loyal. 2019 Silverado and Ram will definatly put a dent in F series sales for 2018 CY.
#118
#119
#120