Bought a built 351W short block, trying to find the right heads

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 01-01-2018, 11:39 PM
Bootlegger's Deluxe's Avatar
Bootlegger's Deluxe
Bootlegger's Deluxe is offline
Fleet Mechanic

Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Delhi, Iowa
Posts: 1,664
Received 17 Likes on 9 Posts
Bought a built 351W short block, trying to find the right heads

Hello everyone!

I was at the machinist's shop dropping off a set of big block heads for a valve job, and he told me he had a deal I may be interested in. He had a rebuilt and upgraded 351W that someone dropped off to build, didnt come to pay for, and finally abandoned it. It's been in the corner for a year and a half, so i got it for the cost of parts. it is an F4TE roller block.

It has a set of forged pistons, it's zero decked, the pistons look to be flattops with small reliefs cut in them to account for valves, and I was told that with a set of 64cc heads, the compression was 10.5 to 1.

I'm planning on this being a street driven engine, carburated, and I have been looking at aluminum heads for it. I'm quite pleased with the AFR heads, but the two options are a 60cc head, or a 72 cc head. From what i understand, the 60 cc head will bump my compression ratio higher, and the 70cc heads will lower it. But i guess my question is, how much higher or lower will it go? Will the 72 cc heads get my compression ratio to around 10 to 1 or 9.5 to 1, or will it dip lower? will the 60 cc heads push me above 11 to 1? My build that was in my head was hoping to run on pump premium gas (91 octane or 93 octane) which seemed like 9.5 to 1 ratio would have been ideal.

If anyone would have more info on what these heads would do for my compression ratio, I'd love to hear it, I'm a bit over my head, i think.
 
  #2  
Old 01-02-2018, 05:04 PM
baddad457's Avatar
baddad457
baddad457 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: May 2003
Location: south louisiana
Posts: 11,122
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
8 cc's in a 351 will probably change it by a half point at best. I did the math and the 72's will net you about a 9.5 to 1 ratio.. Put in a wide LSA EFI cam, high rise dual plane intake topped with a vacuum sec 650 carb and you'll have a torque monster. If you go higher on the ratio, you'll need a narrower LSA cam to bleed off some pressure and less timing to run it. Otherwise with the EFI cams you'll need to run pump premium gas in it.
 
  #3  
Old 01-02-2018, 05:32 PM
BaronVonAutomatc's Avatar
BaronVonAutomatc
BaronVonAutomatc is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
What vehicle will it go into? Manual or automatic? 2.73:1 or 4.11:1 gears?

60cc = 11:1. You can generally run higher compression with aluminum heads but 11:1 would be pushing it on pump gas. 10:1 is probably okay, 9.5 should be no worries.

Check the dynamic ratio too with some different cam specs. 8.0:1 or below dynamic is the rule of thumb (7.0:1 in a heavy hauler) with iron heads.

https://www.uempistons.com/index.php...tors&type=comp
 
  #4  
Old 01-02-2018, 09:01 PM
Bootlegger's Deluxe's Avatar
Bootlegger's Deluxe
Bootlegger's Deluxe is offline
Fleet Mechanic

Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Delhi, Iowa
Posts: 1,664
Received 17 Likes on 9 Posts
going in a 3500 lb truck, with a manual overdrive trans, and probably a 3.73 gear.

its going to be street driven, but on the edge of "probably shouldnt be street driven"
 
  #5  
Old 01-02-2018, 10:51 PM
baddad457's Avatar
baddad457
baddad457 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: May 2003
Location: south louisiana
Posts: 11,122
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
You can't run any more compression with aluminum over iron heads. Once the engine's hot, it's hot. I'm running 10.4 to 1 in my 331 with aluminum heads and it requires no less than 92 octane. Feed it 87 and it'll self destruct. Did that once when I first got it together 13 years ago (that's what was in the tank) and it sounded like it was crushing gravel. Ain't fed it nothing but 91-93 mixed since. The cam's a Z303 with a 112* LSA if I recall, I've run the same ratio in a 390 with narrower LSA cams and got by feeding them both (two different motors) 87-89. BBoth had the stock iron heads.
 
  #6  
Old 01-02-2018, 11:20 PM
Bootlegger's Deluxe's Avatar
Bootlegger's Deluxe
Bootlegger's Deluxe is offline
Fleet Mechanic

Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Delhi, Iowa
Posts: 1,664
Received 17 Likes on 9 Posts
yeah, i've heard the argument about that you can run more compression on lower octane gas, even if it is true, im not going to take the chance. I want this thing to get a steady diet of 91-93 octane fuel.
 
  #7  
Old 01-03-2018, 09:56 AM
BaronVonAutomatc's Avatar
BaronVonAutomatc
BaronVonAutomatc is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Well, with aluminum heads and dynamic CR of 8.0:1 or lower you should be able to run 87 all day long.
 
  #8  
Old 01-03-2018, 10:40 PM
Bootlegger's Deluxe's Avatar
Bootlegger's Deluxe
Bootlegger's Deluxe is offline
Fleet Mechanic

Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Delhi, Iowa
Posts: 1,664
Received 17 Likes on 9 Posts
I guess you lost me on the term "dynamic compression ratio". care to enlighten me?
 
  #9  
Old 01-04-2018, 01:40 AM
xlt4wd90's Avatar
xlt4wd90
xlt4wd90 is offline
Lead Driver

Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 6,723
Likes: 0
Received 86 Likes on 75 Posts
If both valves are closed when the piston starts moving up from BDC, the compression ratio is the static calculation (total volume:combustion chamber volume). But since valves don't close instantly due to lobe profile and timing, the achieved compression ratio is always less due to escaping gasses. That's the dynamic CR.
 
  #10  
Old 01-04-2018, 09:50 AM
baddad457's Avatar
baddad457
baddad457 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: May 2003
Location: south louisiana
Posts: 11,122
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
The dynamic is more affected by the valve overlap than when the piston starts moving up the cylinder. By that time the intake valve has closed. The time when the intake and exhaust valves are open at the same time (exhaust closing, intake opening) is the overlap and is affected by the LSA width.
 
  #11  
Old 01-04-2018, 03:17 PM
BaronVonAutomatc's Avatar
BaronVonAutomatc
BaronVonAutomatc is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Dynamic CR is a function of static CR plus rod length and when the intake valve closes, it calculates where the piston is in the cylinder when the intake fully closes and how much it's actually compressing the a/f.

Intake centerline and duration determine when the intake closes.
 
  #12  
Old 01-04-2018, 03:27 PM
baddad457's Avatar
baddad457
baddad457 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: May 2003
Location: south louisiana
Posts: 11,122
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by BaronVonAutomatc
Dynamic CR is a function of static CR plus rod length and when the intake valve closes, it calculates where the piston is in the cylinder when the intake fully closes and how much it's actually compressing the a/f.

Intake centerline and duration determine when the intake closes.
All that is only a part of the equation. You also need to calculate (if that's even possible) the airflow moving through the intake and carb, which constantly changes with rpm and how that airflow affects the amount of air actually getting into the cylinder. Even after all that, the ignition timing also affects what octane fuel is required to prevent detonation or preignition.
 
  #13  
Old 01-04-2018, 06:13 PM
BaronVonAutomatc's Avatar
BaronVonAutomatc
BaronVonAutomatc is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Whatever, with 72cc aluminum heads and 280°+ cam (i.e. street driven, but on the edge of "probably shouldnt be street driven") in a 3,500lb vehicle that engine will run on 87 octane no worries.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1990 f-150
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
8
10-22-2006 10:02 AM
lifted77f250
335 Series- 5.8/351M, 6.6/400, 351 Cleveland
4
07-12-2005 05:44 AM
Sixoh
Y-Block V8 (239, 272, 292, 312, 317, 341, 368)
6
11-23-2004 10:47 AM
Kruse
335 Series- 5.8/351M, 6.6/400, 351 Cleveland
8
06-19-2004 04:19 PM
for_play
Big Block V8 - 385 Series (6.1/370, 7.0/429, 7.5/460)
4
06-07-2001 11:42 PM



Quick Reply: Bought a built 351W short block, trying to find the right heads



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:35 PM.