Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks

Recomendation on towing?!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 30, 2017 | 10:54 PM
  #16  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Originally Posted by Nothing Special
So it must have been the 351 that dragged it down (and the 2 bbl 351 was no powerhouse)
True.. it was a 150hp boat anchor, my father had one of those in a '78 E150.

Originally Posted by Nothing Special
In '86 the 351/manual/3.50 had a GCWR of 11,000 (and was still 11,000 with 4.10s). So I don't think there was a ton of science behind it all.
So from '86 on they were right up to what the later EFI trucks were rated at. Was '86 the first year for the 351HO? Maybe the motor is the difference.
 
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2017 | 11:49 AM
  #17  
Nothing Special's Avatar
Nothing Special
Lead Driver
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,006
Likes: 72
From: Roseville, MN
Originally Posted by Conanski
True.. it was a 150hp boat anchor, my father had one of those in a '78 E150..

But the 6.9L IDI non-turbo couldn't have had much more power than the 2 bbl 351. In '85 with a manual trans it was rated for 9000 (3.08) / 13,000 (3.55) / 14,000 (4.10). And with an auto those ratings change to 10,500 / 12,000 / 14,000. So overall a lot higher than the 351, about the same manual or auto, and no rhyme or reason to whether the manual gives higher or lower ratings than an auto. It just seems like they were determining tow ratings with a dart board.

Originally Posted by Conanski
So from '86 on they were right up to what the later EFI trucks were rated at. Was '86 the first year for the 351HO? Maybe the motor is the difference.
The '85 owners manual lists tow ratings for a 5.8L-2V and a 5.8L4V H.O. with an automatic, but only the 2V with a manual. The 2V auto has ratings of 10,000 (3.55) / 11,000 (3.73) / 11,000 (4.10). The HO has 10,000 (3.00) / 11,500 (3.55) / 12,500 (4.10). For what that's worth.
 
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2017 | 05:07 PM
  #18  
Diesel_Brad's Avatar
Diesel_Brad
Fleet Owner
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 21,437
Likes: 76
From: Gilbert, PA
The 6.9 was 170hp and 338tq

but the 5.8 HO was 190hp and 285tq
 
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2017 | 07:50 PM
  #19  
J ballan's Avatar
J ballan
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 13
From: Saskatchewan
I just stumbled onto this thread. So you guys are telling me a 94 F150 can only tow 2 or 3 thousand pounds?? That just seems ridiculously low to me. But my wife's SUV can tow 8500lbs. Something doesn't add up here.
 
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2017 | 09:11 PM
  #20  
Nothing Special's Avatar
Nothing Special
Lead Driver
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,006
Likes: 72
From: Roseville, MN
Originally Posted by J ballan
I just stumbled onto this thread. So you guys are telling me a 94 F150 can only tow 2 or 3 thousand pounds?? That just seems ridiculously low to me. But my wife's SUV can tow 8500lbs. Something doesn't add up here.
For the pickup, it depends on the engine, trans and axle ratio. Some will be significantly higher than that, but small engine, manual trans and tall gears, sure, that'll be about the limit.

For the SUV, what does your wife have? 8500 lbs seems pretty high for most, but maybe not out of the question for a newer full size (and probably even low for something like an Excursion).

And by the way, tow ratings are rarely simple. Older vehicles rated GCWR, total weight of the truck and trailer. So the more weight you had on the truck it was obvious that you had to have that much less on the trailer. Newer vehicles often give a max trailer weight, which seems simpler. But often there's fine print. I know my dad's Honda minivan was rated to tow a 5000 lb trailer... if the van was empty with just the driver in it. Yes, the owner's manual said that. But a casual glance made it seem like it simply was rated to tow 5000 lbs.
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2017 | 12:54 AM
  #21  
SoonerLS's Avatar
SoonerLS
Senior User
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 121
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Nothing Special
And by the way, tow ratings are rarely simple. Older vehicles rated GCWR, total weight of the truck and trailer.
Ford still rates them on GCWR. They publish a big matrix of tow ratings that takes the engine, axle ratio, GCWR, wheelbase, transmission, and driveline configuration (4x2 vs 4x4) into consideration.

Here's the table for the '13 F-150:
https://www.ford.com/resources/ford/...rv&tt_f150.pdf
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2017 | 06:56 AM
  #22  
J ballan's Avatar
J ballan
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 13
From: Saskatchewan
Originally Posted by Nothing Special
For the pickup, it depends on the engine, trans and axle ratio. Some will be significantly higher than that, but small engine, manual trans and tall gears, sure, that'll be about the limit.

For the SUV, what does your wife have? 8500 lbs seems pretty high for most, but maybe not out of the question for a newer full size (and probably even low for something like an Excursion).

And by the way, tow ratings are rarely simple. Older vehicles rated GCWR, total weight of the truck and trailer. So the more weight you had on the truck it was obvious that you had to have that much less on the trailer. Newer vehicles often give a max trailer weight, which seems simpler. But often there's fine print. I know my dad's Honda minivan was rated to tow a 5000 lb trailer... if the van was empty with just the driver in it. Yes, the owner's manual said that. But a casual glance made it seem like it simply was rated to tow 5000 lbs.
She drives a Yukon. Just double checked it and it's good for 8100lbs. Anyway just kinda shocked that a truck would be that much lower.
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2017 | 09:13 AM
  #23  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Originally Posted by J ballan
She drives a Yukon. Just double checked it and it's good for 8100lbs. Anyway just kinda shocked that a truck would be that much lower.
The same formulas still apply, the difference is all these newer "1/2 ton" trucks are roughly equivalent to an F250 from this generation. The engines are at least twice as powerful, transmissions are much more durable, and brakes and axles are bigger compared to these old 1/2 tons.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-2

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-5

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-7

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Nov 1, 2017 | 09:16 AM
  #24  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Originally Posted by Nothing Special
The 2V auto has ratings of 10,000 (3.55) / 11,000 (3.73) / 11,000 (4.10). The HO has 10,000 (3.00) / 11,500 (3.55) / 12,500 (4.10). For what that's worth.
So Ford considered the manual trans the weak link then as they always have.
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2017 | 10:30 AM
  #25  
HardScrabble's Avatar
HardScrabble
Temporarily Deactivated
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,859
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by Conanski
So Ford considered the manual trans the weak link then as they always have.
The weak link is the loose nut behind the wheel. The manual trans requires user input. Around and around we go.

Ever see someone try to speed shift while towing at GCW?
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2017 | 10:37 AM
  #26  
HardScrabble's Avatar
HardScrabble
Temporarily Deactivated
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,859
Likes: 2
Don't know if it is still true but for a while the DOT or NTSB or whatever alphabet soup bureaucrats were imposing their will on the people were using the rule that as long as you didn't overload any one component you were ok. Don't overload a tire or a spring or a hitch, etc.

You try to find GCWR for an old truck and it's hard to understand. Fifth wheel hitches, goosenecks and duallys really confuse the issue.
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2017 | 12:14 PM
  #27  
Nothing Special's Avatar
Nothing Special
Lead Driver
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,006
Likes: 72
From: Roseville, MN
Originally Posted by J ballan
She drives a Yukon. Just double checked it and it's good for 8100lbs. Anyway just kinda shocked that a truck would be that much lower.
I Googled Yukon tow rating and got a GMC site that does list 8,500 lbs (don't know what year). But the fine print does say "When determining the total weight of trailer and cargo, include the weight of any additional passengers and optional equipment (driver weight and base equipment are already included)." So if you put an additional 500 lbs of people, and 1000 lbs of cargo in the vehicle it will reduce the tow rating. So like I said, tow ratings aren't simple. Lots of people get confused by GCWR, but as long as you know your truck's weight it's still the most straightforward rating system.

Originally Posted by Conanski
The same formulas still apply, the difference is all these newer "1/2 ton" trucks are roughly equivalent to an F250 from this generation. The engines are at least twice as powerful, transmissions are much more durable, and brakes and axles are bigger compared to these old 1/2 tons.
And in fact, the F-250 from this generation is now actually called an F-150. The "standard duty" F-250 that got the new body style in '97 was rebadged as an F-150 in '98 or '99 when Ford realized that having 2 different F-250s that shared nothing in common except the name was not a Better Idea.

Originally Posted by HardScrabble
The weak link is the loose nut behind the wheel. The manual trans requires user input. Around and around we go.

Ever see someone try to speed shift while towing at GCW?
But unfortunately, Ford's idea of what the weak link is ultimately is the only thing that matters. They put a lower tow rating on a manual trans and it has a lower tow rating. It doesn't matter if you or I can shift a trans better than that (although it is odd that they thought that diesel pickup drivers could shift well back in '85)

Originally Posted by HardScrabble
.... You try to find GCWR for an old truck and it's hard to understand. Fifth wheel hitches, goosenecks and duallys really confuse the issue.
I disagree. It's a big table, but it's a lot easier to understand than a lot of the newer charts that say the maximum trailer weight rating is 8,500 lbs and then says in the fine print that you need to include the weight of passengers and cargo in your trailer weight.
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2017 | 03:59 PM
  #28  
Skip1970's Avatar
Skip1970
Hotshot
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 15,014
Likes: 35
From: Semper Fi tell I die!
guess we all need to sell our ford trucks and buy yukon suv to haul anything now
 
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2017 | 09:31 AM
  #29  
HardScrabble's Avatar
HardScrabble
Temporarily Deactivated
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,859
Likes: 2
You must not have seen the owner's manual for 1991.

I'll try to post a picture if I remember long enough.
 
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2017 | 06:36 AM
  #30  
Skip1970's Avatar
Skip1970
Hotshot
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 15,014
Likes: 35
From: Semper Fi tell I die!
i decided im just going to purchase a older used semi truck to haul larger loads with since these pickups cant handle 20k
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:18 PM.

story-0
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 10:59:05


VIEW MORE
story-2
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-4
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-6
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-7
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-8
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE