Notices
All Things Towing Conventional, 5th Wheel, Toy Hauler, Flatbed, Gooseneck, Electrical/Brakes/etc.

Altitude Effect

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 5, 2017 | 10:56 AM
  #1  
volwing1's Avatar
volwing1
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Altitude Effect

Planning to tow my 10,500# 5'ver thru Nebraska and Montana on I-90 with my F250 6.2 with 3.73 diff. I have read that my power loss could be 18% at the 6,000 ft elevation. Question is what will be most noticeable during that much power loss? Will the truck simply stay in a lower gear longer than at say 2,000'?Also with thinner air will the truck computer call for less fuel to accommodate the reduced oxygen?
 
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2017 | 12:31 PM
  #2  
RV_Tech's Avatar
RV_Tech
Hotshot
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 10,060
Likes: 491
From: Bristol, TN.
I can not give you an exact answer. With our truck camper we were at full payload capacity. Much less than the effect of your fiver I know, but we ran that same route and my impression was the truck ran about one gear lower and stayed in it longer than at lower elevation. No real significant impact in terms of driveability, but there was no mistaking we were at elevation.

Steve
 
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2017 | 01:49 PM
  #3  
HRTKD's Avatar
HRTKD
Hotshot
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 19,686
Likes: 12,808
From: Wyoming
Club FTE Gold Member
The general rule of thumb is 4% loss of power for each 1,000' elevation gain. At 6,000' elevation that equates to 24% power loss. Welcome to my world. I live at that elevation.

The rule may only apply to normally aspirated engines, not forced induction.

I pull my 11k (GVWR) toy hauler up 11,000' mountain passes with my 6.7L. It does well, but it's working hard with engine oil temp of 243 and transmission temp of 232. That's a mountain pass. If you're not hitting the passes then you should be OK, but you might be wishing for 4.10 gears.
 
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2017 | 02:04 PM
  #4  
RV_Tech's Avatar
RV_Tech
Hotshot
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 10,060
Likes: 491
From: Bristol, TN.
That's interesting. I think we were usually running in 4th and downshifting to 3rd with our 6.2, but our transmission temperature never went up. Normally with that load we are in 5th and downshifting to 4th. But we also dropped down to 3rd sometimes which seldom happens to us on the flat.
 
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2017 | 02:36 PM
  #5  
Chuck's First Ford's Avatar
Chuck's First Ford
Postmaster
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 4,392
Likes: 22
From: very South Texas
the truck computer will take care of the engine.. just fine. fuel injection is so NICE.

fyi.. higher up you should see 85 in stead of 87.. use 85...

Yes, 20 to 25 percent loss is possible... and Normal
yes,1 gear lower and held longer. maybe 2 gears.....

long ago... semi-tractor-trailer Gas engines with 200 hp did them mountains...
just more work by the driver
 
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2017 | 02:52 PM
  #6  
HRTKD's Avatar
HRTKD
Hotshot
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 19,686
Likes: 12,808
From: Wyoming
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Chuck's First Ford
fyi.. higher up you should see 85 in stead of 87.. use 85...
Agreed. My prior truck got the best MPG on 85.
 
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2017 | 03:00 PM
  #7  
j759ll's Avatar
j759ll
Senior User
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 300
Likes: 1
From: White Oak
Originally Posted by volwing1
Planning to tow my 10,500# 5'ver thru Nebraska and Montana on I-90 with my F250 6.2 with 3.73 diff. I have read that my power loss could be 18% at the 6,000 ft elevation. Question is what will be most noticeable during that much power loss? Will the truck simply stay in a lower gear longer than at say 2,000'?Also with thinner air will the truck computer call for less fuel to accommodate the reduced oxygen?
This video should give you good info
 
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2017 | 01:20 PM
  #8  
RA12726's Avatar
RA12726
Banned
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 359
Likes: 19
Originally Posted by HRTKD
...The rule may only apply to normally aspirated engines, not forced induction...
You are correct, Jim. A turbo-charger compensates for the lower atmospheric pressures at higher elevations. In the Rockies and Sierras, when my truck is working hard it's because of the grade(s), but I don't notice a decrease in performance due to the elevation. The same was true when I flew private aircraft. A normally aspirated piston engine would loose power as we climbed; a turbocharged engine would keep on cranking out the horses.

Rob
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Sep 8, 2017 | 02:59 PM
  #9  
HRTKD's Avatar
HRTKD
Hotshot
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 19,686
Likes: 12,808
From: Wyoming
Club FTE Gold Member
Thank you for the confirmation Rob.
 
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2017 | 03:43 PM
  #10  
Chuck's First Ford's Avatar
Chuck's First Ford
Postmaster
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 4,392
Likes: 22
From: very South Texas
superchargers and turbochargers..

during and after world war II...... fighter planes, race planes.
 
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2017 | 07:14 AM
  #11  
rvpuller's Avatar
rvpuller
Moderator
Veteran: Coast Guard
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 6,509
Likes: 901
From: Home Base Nebraska
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by volwing1
Planning to tow my 10,500# 5'ver thru Nebraska and Montana on I-90 with my F250 6.2 with 3.73 diff. I have read that my power loss could be 18% at the 6,000 ft elevation. Question is what will be most noticeable during that much power loss? Will the truck simply stay in a lower gear longer than at say 2,000'?Also with thinner air will the truck computer call for less fuel to accommodate the reduced oxygen?
If you are going to stay on I-90 you will be in South Dakota and Montana not Nebraska unless you use I-80 and then cut up to 90.

I home base out of Nebraska at 2000 ft and run the mountains of Colorado often pulling my trailer and with the new computer controller motors the altitude affect is less notacible than when we had carbarators, its really has changed. My first EFI was 91 460 and it was better than my old 460 with a carb after I installed a Banks Power Pack, my 2000 V10 was a hands down improvement over the 460 and my 13 6.2 is amazing how it compensates for altitude. With 4.30 gears I really don't notice much of a change until I hit the 6K point with a real drop off around 8 to 9K, the way it adjust is surprising. The route you are planning will be no problem as far as altitude goes but you may be running into some head and side winds but just go down a gear and you won't have a problem, just remember the whole time you are heading west you are going uphill but when you head back east you will be going down with the prevailing winds behind you. I always figure my mileage going both ways not tank to tank.

Denny
 
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2017 | 06:45 PM
  #12  
acadianbob's Avatar
acadianbob
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,420
Likes: 695
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by SecondChance
You are correct, Jim. A turbo-charger compensates for the lower atmospheric pressures at higher elevations. In the Rockies and Sierras, when my truck is working hard it's because of the grade(s), but I don't notice a decrease in performance due to the elevation. The same was true when I flew private aircraft. A normally aspirated piston engine would loose power as we climbed; a turbocharged engine would keep on cranking out the horses.

Rob
Yep. I pulled a 8,500 5er up through the Eisenhower Tunnel with my Ecoboost and it seemed totally unfazed by the altitude.

Replacing the Ecoboost with a F250 6.2 with 4.30s soon. I'm a little concerned that the 6.2 is not going to pull as strong as the Ecoboost; especially at altitude. But, I need the additional payload; and don't want a diesel.
 
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2017 | 07:54 PM
  #13  
Super Duty DJ's Avatar
Super Duty DJ
More Turbo
15 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 561
Likes: 85
Originally Posted by acadianbob
Yep. I pulled a 8,500 5er up through the Eisenhower Tunnel with my Ecoboost and it seemed totally unfazed by the altitude.

Replacing the Ecoboost with a F250 6.2 with 4.30s soon. I'm a little concerned that the 6.2 is not going to pull as strong as the Ecoboost; especially at altitude. But, I need the additional payload; and don't want a diesel.
I have pulled my 8,500 lb fiver up through the Eisenhower Tunnel with my 2015 F250 with the 6.2 and 4.30s and it held between 55 and 60 all the way up. The truck definitely knows that the camper is there, and there were a few downshifts into 2nd gear, but it gets the job done.
 
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2017 | 12:56 PM
  #14  
acadianbob's Avatar
acadianbob
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,420
Likes: 695
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by Super Duty DJ
I have pulled my 8,500 lb fiver up through the Eisenhower Tunnel with my 2015 F250 with the 6.2 and 4.30s and it held between 55 and 60 all the way up. The truck definitely knows that the camper is there, and there were a few downshifts into 2nd gear, but it gets the job done.
Thanks for that info. I will have to get used to the additional RPM.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
totalimpact
1999 - 2016 Super Duty
2
Feb 24, 2019 03:53 AM
mnero
6.7L Power Stroke Diesel
46
Dec 7, 2017 09:01 PM
volwing1
6.2L V8
11
Oct 28, 2015 12:10 PM
Dholt
1994.5 - 1997 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
31
Dec 25, 2008 08:39 AM
RedRage
2004 - 2008 F150
1
Jul 14, 2005 07:15 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:28 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE