Notices

Trying to identify engine

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 31, 2017 | 03:36 PM
  #1  
SleeprLegend's Avatar
SleeprLegend
Thread Starter
|
Mountain Pass
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 249
Likes: 2
From: Moody, AL
Trying to identify engine

1994 Bronco (5.0?) E4OD 4x4

When I picked up my Bronco my stepdad said it had a 5.8 in it even after I pointed out the 5.0 intake manifold. He was told by the previous owner that he "swapped in a 5.8". I have confirmed this is a 5.0 block, but the casting numbers are odd. Are there mods you can install in a 5.0 block that come from a 5.8? The truck was not registered for 9 years, so the idea that the engine was previously blown seems likely.

The problem I have is that I can not comfortably do any work on the engine without knowing what is inside. I tried using the casting numbers, but that led to more questions.

Block (under starter) = FISE 98 = 1991, Thunderbird 1958+, Engine ; 5G29 = July 29 1995
Head (driver side front) = 22
Intake manifold (under distributor) = RF-E9TE-9K-461A4A = 1989 Truck Engine
Exhaust manifold (driver side) = RF-F6TE-9-431878 = 1996 Truck Engine
Exhaust manifold (pass side) = RF-F6TE-9430-G78 = 1996 Truck Engine
Transmission (yellow sticker) = 1994 E4OD exchange program RF-FOTP-7006-CE = 1990 Truck Auto Transmission
Alternator bracket = F-3TA-10239 = Possible missing digit F = 1993 Truck Chassis

With this combination of parts I am at a loss as to what the engine truly is. My stepdad is going to try to contact the previous owner, but it was sold 2 years ago.

Does anyone have any ideas about what I have or how I can confirm what it is without removing the engine?
 
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2017 | 04:42 PM
  #2  
85e150's Avatar
85e150
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 34,503
Likes: 2,820
Club FTE Gold Member
Stare at the front driver side of the engine. Stare at this. Go back and forth until it's clear:

http://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.ford...8248db973c.jpg
 
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2017 | 04:54 PM
  #3  
SleeprLegend's Avatar
SleeprLegend
Thread Starter
|
Mountain Pass
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 249
Likes: 2
From: Moody, AL
Originally Posted by 85e150six4mtod
Stare at the front driver side of the engine. Stare at this. Go back and forth until it's clear:

http://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.ford...8248db973c.jpg
I know the block is a 302 based upon the thermostat housing bolts. It does not have the taller deck height either. I'm trying to figure out if something is not OEM inside the engine based upon the parts attached to the engine and the story of "swapped in 5.8" from the previous owner.
 
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2017 | 05:37 PM
  #4  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
There is no way to know what is inside the engine based on casting numbers.. simply because even when these trucks were new they were built with a pile of "mismatched" parts. The reality is this truck line was a dumping ground for all the Windsor family engine parts Ford had left over from decades of production... and... this isn't a new truck anymore so who friggen knows what combination of OEM and potentially aftermarket parts you have there.

So all that said it sounds like your Stepdad was lied to or the PO really didn't know what he had, it happens I have met plenty of people that don't know the visual differences between these engines.

So you still need to do a little investigation.
Look at the top outer corner of the cylinder heads and see if you can spot a letter cast into the head just outside the valve cover.

Now a '91 truck engine would been a low output 180hp slug with a tiny flat tappet cam but a '91 T-bird motor would have been a 225hp 5.0HO roller motor, so the next question is how does this motor run? Is it a little soft on the bottom end but pulls hard to 5000rpm or is it kinda peppy at low rpms but has no topend HP at all and struggles to rev past 4000rpm.
 
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2017 | 05:48 PM
  #5  
KULTULZ's Avatar
KULTULZ
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,132
Likes: 219
From: W (BY GOD) V
Post

Originally Posted by SleeprLegend

1994 Bronco (5.0?) E4OD 4x4

Block (under starter) = FISE 98 = 1991, Thunderbird 1958+, Engine ; 5G29 = July 29 1995

Head (driver side front) = 22
22 is Mold No.

Intake manifold (under distributor) = RF-E9TE-9K-461A4A = 1989 Truck Engine
E9TE 9K461-A4A

Exhaust manifold (driver side) = RF-F6TE-9-431878 = 1996 Truck Engine

Exhaust manifold (pass side) = RF-F6TE-9430-G78 = 1996 Truck Engine
F6TE 9431-878 (Suffix Strange)
F6TE 9430-G78

With this combination of parts I am at a loss as to what the engine truly is. My stepdad is going to try to contact the previous owner, but it was sold 2 years ago.

Does anyone have any ideas about what I have or how I can confirm what it is without removing the engine?
For certain you have a 5.0L block. Now what's inside...
 
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2017 | 05:53 PM
  #6  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 787
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by KULTULZ

F6TE 9431-878 (Suffix Strange)
It's probably B7B & F6TF-9430-G78 is probably G7B

F1SE is the block casting number prefix, the date code on the block is 5G29: July (G) 29, 1995 (5), so this 302 could have been installed in a 1996 Thunderbird, Cougar, probably others as well.
 
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2017 | 06:16 PM
  #7  
KULTULZ's Avatar
KULTULZ
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,132
Likes: 219
From: W (BY GOD) V
Post

Originally Posted by NumberDummy

Casting numbers are foundry marks, cannot be cross referenced to Ford part numbers. Are usually WORTHLESS for identifying engine sizes.
The actual Component I.D. No is the Engineering Number of the component and while not all info was released for public view, can be used to ascertain the correct Service PN, along with Casting Date Codes, foundry ID, etc.

Basic PN 6015 would be the actual bare block casting no.

FORD had to have a method of identifying component for assembly and warranty, and these were ENGINEERING COMPONENT and ASSEMBLY PN's.

The confusion begins when one sees F1SE and immediately assumes it is BIRD only.
 
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2017 | 06:30 PM
  #8  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 787
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by KULTULZ

Basic PN 6015 would be the actual bare block casting no.
6015 is the basic block casting number, 6010 is the basic bare block part number.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

 Brett Foote
story-2

10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-3

Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

 Brett Foote
story-4

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-9

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
Old Aug 31, 2017 | 06:36 PM
  #9  
KULTULZ's Avatar
KULTULZ
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,132
Likes: 219
From: W (BY GOD) V
Post

Originally Posted by NumberDummy

6015 is the basic block casting number, 6010 is the basic bare block SERVICE part number.
Originally Posted by KULTULZ

Basic PN 6015 would be the actual bare block casting no.
Ain't that what I said...

You upper management types always messing with the grunts...
 
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2017 | 06:39 PM
  #10  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 787
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by KULTULZ
Ain't that what I said...

You upper management types always messing with the grunts...
Hmmm, my eyes appear to be playing tricks, probably since I've been on here since about 8AM (PDT) and yesterday even longer.

Time to go take a nap and rest my peepers.
 
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2017 | 06:45 PM
  #11  
KULTULZ's Avatar
KULTULZ
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,132
Likes: 219
From: W (BY GOD) V
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by NumberDummy

Hmmm, my eyes appear to be playing tricks, probably since I've been on here since about 8AM (PDT) and yesterday even longer.

Time to go take a nap and rest my peepers.
I have the same problem, no life.

I am sure you have read some of my asinine replies here...

Bad eyes and CRS don't mix...
 
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2017 | 04:17 AM
  #12  
SleeprLegend's Avatar
SleeprLegend
Thread Starter
|
Mountain Pass
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 249
Likes: 2
From: Moody, AL
I thank you all for your responses!

At this point I am trying to conclude 2 things.

1) This is not the original engine - Confirmed based upon date casting in block?
2) What mods can be done to a 5.0 block that are "swapped over" from a 5.8 to match the story I have been told?

I will look for more casting numbers on the heads later.

I was not to concerned about the part numbers after the year was identified.

This engine definitely feels more powerful than the 5.0 I have in my 1994 F-150 5.0 E4OD RWD that does not have a slipping transmission.
 
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2017 | 08:09 AM
  #13  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Originally Posted by SleeprLegend
2) What mods can be done to a 5.0 block that are "swapped over" from a 5.8 to match the story I have been told?
None worth talking about, the 5.8 block is taller and wider so a 5.0 intake doesn't fit, distributor doesn't fit, oilpan doesn't fit, the exhaust manifolds are different, and the engine balance is different. Both motors use the same heads but that means there is nothing to gain there. And to add insult to injury the 5.0 truck intake is better designed than the 5.8 version so it's not worth trying to make that work either.
 
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2017 | 12:43 PM
  #14  
SleeprLegend's Avatar
SleeprLegend
Thread Starter
|
Mountain Pass
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 249
Likes: 2
From: Moody, AL
Originally Posted by Conanski
None worth talking about, the 5.8 block is taller and wider so a 5.0 intake doesn't fit, distributor doesn't fit, oilpan doesn't fit, the exhaust manifolds are different, and the engine balance is different. Both motors use the same heads but that means there is nothing to gain there. And to add insult to injury the 5.0 truck intake is better designed than the 5.8 version so it's not worth trying to make that work either.
That was the piece of info I needed. There was hope that something had been done to the engine involving 5.8 components solely because of the story I have been told.

Now I'm going to have to do a lot more research before I change anything on the engine.

If the person that installed the engine built it, then I am in trouble. I have found manifold bolts an inch out, emissions port on back of head not sealed or torqued, to small serpentine belt, slightly loose hose clamps, etc, etc, etc...

I have been debating taking the truck to a guy I know that builds racing 5.0s. This might make him the best bet.

Thank you all!
 
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2017 | 07:55 PM
  #15  
baddad457's Avatar
baddad457
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 11,141
Likes: 25
From: south louisiana
While nobody came straight out and said it, the block IS a 5.0. But the date code is too new to be the original engine. That casting was used in every Ford/Merc car, truck and van that was equipped with a 5.0
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
61 uni
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
7
Jul 4, 2004 05:20 PM
61 uni
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
2
Jul 4, 2004 08:30 AM
Speed Metal
Engine Swaps
3
Jun 15, 2004 06:33 PM
eangel
1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
20
Oct 30, 2003 01:18 PM
daven2nl
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
3
Apr 2, 2001 07:24 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:32 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

Slideshow: Top 10 Fords at 2026 Ford Nationals

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-09 11:10:08


VIEW MORE
story-1
3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

Based on years of owning multiple modern Ford products.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-09 10:53:36


VIEW MORE
story-2
10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

SPONSORED: From muddy boots to rain-soaked cargo, these upgrades address some of the most common frustrations Ford truck owners face every day.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-06-08 18:50:34


VIEW MORE
story-3
Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

Here's everything you need to know about every Ford engine available for the 2026 model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-05 12:58:01


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-5
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-6
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-9
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE