Notices
Excursion - King of SUVs 2000 - 2005 Ford Excursion
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Rear differential question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 6, 2017 | 02:21 PM
  #1  
DadTheJedi's Avatar
DadTheJedi
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Rear differential question

I have a 7.3 2003 Excursion. Quick question I'm sorry if this has been asked before. Should I change the gearing in the rear differential to make the truck go faster at lower RPMs? I know that will decrease my towing capability. Thank you in advance
 
Reply
Old May 6, 2017 | 02:30 PM
  #2  
74Mav's Avatar
74Mav
Tuned
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 402
Likes: 1
From: Burlington, Maine
Why would you drop down your gear ratio? You didnt say whether its 2 or 4wd. If it's 4wd, you'll have to do both axles. Changing the ratio won't really affect how much you can tow, just how well it'll tow.

Personally, I wouldn't touch it.
 
Reply
Old May 6, 2017 | 02:57 PM
  #3  
gapman789's Avatar
gapman789
Tuned
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
"It's not how fast you tow, it's how well you tow fast'.
 
Reply
Old May 6, 2017 | 04:22 PM
  #4  
WE3ZS's Avatar
WE3ZS
Moderator
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,052
Likes: 1,550
From: Media PA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by DadTheJedi
I have a 7.3 2003 Excursion. Quick question I'm sorry if this has been asked before. Should I change the gearing in the rear differential to make the truck go faster at lower RPMs? I know that will decrease my towing capability. Thank you in advance

Hi Jedi Dad, welcome to the Ex forum!
What exactly is your goal here? Are you trying to make your EX a super high MPG highway rig? At a certain point the engine will get to the point of being less efficient if geared to high as it will be lugging. Another thing to consider is the 4R100 trans with only 4 gears will be less of a good match with very high gears vs a more modern 5 or 6 (or more) speed trans.
 
Reply
Old May 6, 2017 | 07:28 PM
  #5  
Stewart_H's Avatar
Stewart_H
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 29,380
Likes: 118
From: Central Coast of CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by WE3ZS
Are you trying to make your EX a super high MPG highway rig?
Because the 7.3L has such low-end grunt, it's different than the V10 which benefits from the higher numerical gear. If the OP goes with a higher numerical R&P gear, he would be getting a lot worse highway MPG's because the sweet spot for best highway mileage is approximately 2000rpm's on the 7.3L PSD.

Jedi dad, you really only need or should want to change the R&P gear on a 7.3L powered rig if you go with a bigger tire. For instance, I'm running a 37" tire with 4.30 gears, which puts me almost exactly back where I would be with the OEM 3.73's and the 265/75/16's that came on the rig.

7.3's run out of RPM very fast, unlike the gassers.

Stewart
 
Reply
Old May 7, 2017 | 08:30 AM
  #6  
WE3ZS's Avatar
WE3ZS
Moderator
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,052
Likes: 1,550
From: Media PA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Stewart_H
Because the 7.3L has such low-end grunt, it's different than the V10 which benefits from the higher numerical gear. If the OP goes with a higher numerical R&P gear, he would be getting a lot worse highway MPG's because the sweet spot for best highway mileage is approximately 2000rpm's on the 7.3L PSD.

Jedi dad, you really only need or should want to change the R&P gear on a 7.3L powered rig if you go with a bigger tire. For instance, I'm running a 37" tire with 4.30 gears, which puts me almost exactly back where I would be with the OEM 3.73's and the 265/75/16's that came on the rig.

7.3's run out of RPM very fast, unlike the gassers.

Stewart
Stewart, I read the OP's question as looking to numerically lower his gear ratio, like dropping from the factory 3.73 to something like 3.55 (or higher, which is actuall a lower number.....? ). He was asking about going faster at lower RPMs. And how doing so would negatively affect his towing abilities.
And I've read Razzi's (and others) experiences with regearing the 7.3 for the larger tires, it's crazy how the gassers have twice the RPM range of the diesels and how and where their best power/efficiency is produced.
 
Reply
Old May 7, 2017 | 10:41 AM
  #7  
Stewart_H's Avatar
Stewart_H
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 29,380
Likes: 118
From: Central Coast of CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by WE3ZS
Stewart, I read the OP's question as looking to numerically lower his gear ratio, like dropping from the factory 3.73 to something like 3.55 (or higher, which is actuall a lower number.....? ). He was asking about going faster at lower RPMs. And how doing so would negatively affect his towing abilities.


Right, and that means going to a higher numerical gear.

Going to a higher gear allows quicker acceleration off the line, and also affects highway RPM gearing which affects towing capabilities

Back when I was into the 5.0 scene, guys that had Mustangs with the 2.73 gears were always wishing they had the 3.08's that came on a lot of the 5.0's, and a lot of times upgraded to the 3.08's (and sometimes even higher) so they could get off the line faster.

Stewart
 
Reply
Old May 7, 2017 | 02:11 PM
  #8  
WE3ZS's Avatar
WE3ZS
Moderator
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,052
Likes: 1,550
From: Media PA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by DadTheJedi
I have a 7.3 2003 Excursion. Quick question I'm sorry if this has been asked before. Should I change the gearing in the rear differential to make the truck go faster at lower RPMs? I know that will decrease my towing capability. Thank you in advance
Originally Posted by WE3ZS
Stewart, I read the OP's question as looking to numerically lower his gear ratio, like dropping from the factory 3.73 to something like 3.55 (or higher, which is actuall a lower number.....? ). He was asking about going faster at lower RPMs. And how doing so would negatively affect his towing abilities.
And I've read Razzi's (and others) experiences with regearing the 7.3 for the larger tires, it's crazy how the gassers have twice the RPM range of the diesels and how and where their best power/efficiency is produced.
Originally Posted by Stewart_H
[/B]
Right, and that means going to a higher numerical gear.

Going to a higher gear allows quicker acceleration off the line, and also affects highway RPM gearing which affects towing capabilities

Back when I was into the 5.0 scene, guys that had Mustangs with the 2.73 gears were always wishing they had the 3.08's that came on a lot of the 5.0's, and a lot of times upgraded to the 3.08's (and sometimes even higher) so they could get off the line faster.

Stewart

I think discussing gearing can be a bit confusing at times as "lower" gears are actually "higher" numbered, as in how my 4.88s are higher (numerically) than the 3.73s that they replaced. Lower = higher and higher = lower can definitely lead to misunderstanding.
But since the OP (I hope he stops back in here to help clarify) mentioned both going faster at lower RPMs and reduced towing abilities I'm pretty sure that he is talking about something numerically less than the factory PSD 3.73 ratio, like the 3.55. That change would allow for higher speed at lower RPMs but would reduce the towing goodness, like Jedi Dad mentioned. And like you pointed out Stewart, going with a "deeper" gear like 4.10 will improve acceleration, but will require higher RPMs to go the same speed and it would tow even better than stock.
Of course I could all upside down here too.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-2

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-5

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-7

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
Old May 7, 2017 | 04:03 PM
  #9  
Stewart_H's Avatar
Stewart_H
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 29,380
Likes: 118
From: Central Coast of CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by WE3ZS
I think discussing gearing can be a bit confusing at times as "lower" gears are actually "higher" numbered, as in how my 4.88s are higher (numerically) than the 3.73s that they replaced. Lower = higher and higher = lower can definitely lead to misunderstanding.
I agree, and it's why I tried to make sure I qualified the way I identified the gear I was talking about.

But since the OP (I hope he stops back in here to help clarify) mentioned both going faster at lower RPMs and reduced towing abilities I'm pretty sure that he is talking about something numerically less than the factory PSD 3.73 ratio, like the 3.55.
That's where you're getting confused. A lower numerical gear will do the opposite at lower speeds. City driving would be even more laggy with a lower numbered gear, and be better towing at freeway speed because it wouldn't be at the high end of the RPM power band

Stewart
 
Reply
Old May 8, 2017 | 10:33 AM
  #10  
DadTheJedi's Avatar
DadTheJedi
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by WE3ZS
Hi Jedi Dad, welcome to the Ex forum!
What exactly is your goal here? Are you trying to make your EX a super high MPG highway rig? At a certain point the engine will get to the point of being less efficient if geared to high as it will be lugging. Another thing to consider is the 4R100 trans with only 4 gears will be less of a good match with very high gears vs a more modern 5 or 6 (or more) speed trans.

Yes My Goal was to try and Increase the MPG a Bit. Yes I do have 4x4
 
Reply
Old May 8, 2017 | 10:42 AM
  #11  
Stewart_H's Avatar
Stewart_H
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 29,380
Likes: 118
From: Central Coast of CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by DadTheJedi
Yes My Goal was to try and Increase the MPG a Bit. Yes I do have 4x4
Keep your stock R&P gear as it is then, unless you're changing tires size (like my example I gave above) because the 3.73's with the stockish size tire ("stockish" because some go to a 285 tire) will give the best overall mileage.

Stewart
 
Reply
Old May 8, 2017 | 11:03 AM
  #12  
pirate4x4_camo's Avatar
pirate4x4_camo
Lead Driver
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 8,259
Likes: 346
From: Northern California
Originally Posted by DadTheJedi
Yes My Goal was to try and Increase the MPG a Bit. Yes I do have 4x4
Lower the roof put a skirt on it and add a boat tail
 
Attached Images  
Reply
Old May 8, 2017 | 11:10 AM
  #13  
Misky6.0's Avatar
Misky6.0
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 5,420
Likes: 16
From: Ouray, CO
Wrap your excursion with an old AirStream body for ultimate aerodynamic efficiency.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
brzehentmaier
1997 - 2006 Expedition & Navigator
4
Feb 6, 2014 06:19 AM
paschman2000
All Things Towing
6
Jul 16, 2013 10:35 PM
raptor2005
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel
5
Oct 5, 2010 02:09 PM
ClearlyBC
2009 - 2014 F150
5
Aug 24, 2009 07:55 PM
Snellville-Dave
Modular V10 (6.8l)
1
Jun 21, 2008 08:38 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:14 PM.

story-0
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-4
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-6
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-7
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-8
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE