Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks

Not the engine I thought

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 23, 2017 | 06:21 PM
  #1  
Rideright1's Avatar
Rideright1
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Not the engine I thought

I bought a 1994 F150 4X4 XLT King cab a few months ago. According to the VIN and what I saw under the hood it was a 5.0. While it is not the best running truck it isn’t bad. Yesterday we went to the parts store and bought oil and a filter when we tried to put the filter on it wouldn’t fit. Crossed referenced the old filter and found it was for a 5.8. I did some checking and sure enough it is a 5.8 not a 5.0. It has the 5.0 upper intake is this a problem? Also we checked the compression it ran from 55 psi to 85 psi mostly in the 50 to 55 psi range. What will cause this they all are close together but very low I think. Any help would be appreciated.
 
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2017 | 06:39 PM
  #2  
timbersteel's Avatar
timbersteel
Logistics Pro
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,698
Likes: 47
From: Mexico, Missouri
Originally Posted by Rideright1
I bought a 1994 F150 4X4 XLT King cab a few months ago. According to the VIN and what I saw under the hood it was a 5.0. While it is not the best running truck it isn’t bad. Yesterday we went to the parts store and bought oil and a filter when we tried to put the filter on it wouldn’t fit. Crossed referenced the old filter and found it was for a 5.8. I did some checking and sure enough it is a 5.8 not a 5.0. It has the 5.0 upper intake is this a problem? Also we checked the compression it ran from 55 psi to 85 psi mostly in the 50 to 55 psi range. What will cause this they all are close together but very low I think. Any help would be appreciated.
It's possible someone swapped the plenums and used the 5.0 on the 5.8 lower intake.
Pictures would help to be sure.
Also, the deck height is shorter on the 302, versus the 351. That is easy to see as well.
The fuel rails for a 302 also run directly in front of the plenum and around the rear of the plenum. The fuel rail doesn't on the 5.8

The 5.8 probably has the added oil cooler built in, hence why you had to get a different size filter.

And double check the compression numbers. If it was 55-85psi, I doubt it would even run, let alone idle.
Be sure the throttle plates are open when checking.
 
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2017 | 07:35 PM
  #3  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Originally Posted by timbersteel
Pictures would help to be sure.
+100

Originally Posted by timbersteel
Also, the deck height is shorter on the 302, versus the 351. That is easy to see as well.
Easiest to see at the distributor mounting surface, 5.0 is nearly level with the intake gasket surface, 5.8 is about 1" below.

Originally Posted by timbersteel
The fuel rails for a 302 also run directly in front of the plenum and around the rear of the plenum. The fuel rail doesn't on the 5.8
Depends upon the vintage I believe, my 5.8 fuel rails look identical to the 5.0 version only wider.

Originally Posted by timbersteel
The 5.8 probably has the added oil cooler built in, hence why you had to get a different size filter.
A good possibility since both motors natively use the same filter.
 
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2017 | 08:29 PM
  #4  
Rideright1's Avatar
Rideright1
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
It does have the oil cooler and the deck height is higher. I checked on a 5.0 and the thermostat housing lower bolt is covered by the timing chain cover but on the motor I have it is above the cover.

I checked the compression numbers multiple times because I thought they were low. I also checked the gauge I was using to see if it was ok and it was. I checked it with the fuel pump relay unplugged so it would not run and WOT.

The fuel rails go make a U around the back of the intake.
 
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2017 | 08:37 PM
  #5  
GoinBoarding's Avatar
GoinBoarding
Cargo Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,326
Likes: 292
From: Laramie, WY
Sounds like a 5.8L to me.

Those compression numbers are not good though. You say you tested the gauge; was this with a known good engine or?

I would do a wet compression test next; if the readings increase in an oiled cylinder it suggests the ring seal is not good. If the numbers are approximately the same, valve issues. Or, do a leak down test and listen/feel where the air escapes to. Crankcase is rings, intake or exhaust is valves.
 
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2017 | 09:31 PM
  #6  
Rideright1's Avatar
Rideright1
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Did a wet test on one cylinder it went up only 5 psi.




This is the only picture i have tonight.

It runs ok and idles good just not a lot of power.

Also someone removed the EGR tube and plugged the exhaust side but the intake side is open. The valve is still there just the tube has been removed.
 
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2017 | 10:33 PM
  #7  
GoinBoarding's Avatar
GoinBoarding
Cargo Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,326
Likes: 292
From: Laramie, WY
I see no vacuum line to the fuel pressure regulator and it looks like the IAT sensor wires are cut. Is the check engine light on, and are there any codes?

Something is likely worn out. Those compression readings are not good. Burned valves or something else related to valve train is most suspect in my opinion. The similar readings among all cylinders is a clue though.

Is there a plate between the EGR valve & upper intake? Otherwise you're looking at a massive vacuum leak when the PCM tells the EVR to open the EGR. It looks like EVR is still there, and you said the EGR valve is present; usually this is done to keep the PCM tricked into thinking EGR system is all OK when in fact it has been disabled.

With a 5.0L upper intake on there, I wonder if the lower intake was port matched. If not, its a terrible match. The 5.0L upper has big fat rectangular ports, and 5.8L lower has small oval ports. A few of us on here have ported 5.8L truck lower intakes to match the larger 5.0L upper for a cheap higher flowing intake (compared to a stock 5.8L setup anyway). Either the previous person working on this engine built it in some particular way, or its cobbled together..proceed with caution.
 
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2017 | 11:01 PM
  #8  
yardbird's Avatar
yardbird
Logistics Pro
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,776
Likes: 862
From: Foothills of NC
Timing chain and gear could be worn causing the low compression across all cylinders, if you're positive your gauge is right. I just can't see an engine running at 55 lbs compression.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Mar 24, 2017 | 06:53 AM
  #9  
'89F2urd's Avatar
'89F2urd
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 5,772
Likes: 442
Well....if it is a 5.8, at least it's not a 5.0! You'll need a rebuild if your compression truly is that low, I don't doubt it runs with that compression, pretty amazing what engines can tolerate....if it runs ok then you can keep running it but you'll need to keep the rebuild relevant in your plans.

Does it burn oil?
 
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2017 | 07:52 AM
  #10  
Scndsin's Avatar
Scndsin
FTE Chapter Leader
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 12,327
Likes: 1,303
From: Central Mississippi
Club FTE Silver Member

Look at the base of your distributor.

If it does NOT have this diagonal casting, it is a 5.0

If it DOES have this diagonal casting, it is a 5.8

Simplest way to 100% tell.

 
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2017 | 12:17 PM
  #11  
Rideright1's Avatar
Rideright1
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
The fuel regulator vacuum hose is not connected and the IAT sensor is I think on the air filter box. Do I need to connect a vacuum hose to the regulator or is it ok running full pressure all the time?
 
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2017 | 01:13 PM
  #12  
'89F2urd's Avatar
'89F2urd
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 5,772
Likes: 442
Fpr is there to trim the fuel at idle, so it's good to have.
 
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2017 | 09:45 AM
  #13  
Mudsport96's Avatar
Mudsport96
Logistics Pro
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,716
Likes: 583
From: Chillicothe
If the regulator has been unhooked for awhile, what's the odds it washed down his cylinders and the rings are shot?
 
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2017 | 01:10 PM
  #14  
'89F2urd's Avatar
'89F2urd
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 5,772
Likes: 442
I think it's doubtful, but certainly possible....it won't run so rich that it'll stink, but it's definitely best left hooked up.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Motorhead351
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
2
Oct 12, 2016 07:58 AM
76250_4x4
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
21
Jul 26, 2011 05:54 PM
Jbrown8988
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
18
Feb 23, 2009 07:59 PM
samickguy15
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
6
May 1, 2006 06:08 PM
mauicruza
Fuel Injection, Carburetion & Fuel System
3
Feb 4, 2006 01:30 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:39 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE