Notices
2017 - 2022 Super Duty The 2017-2022 Ford F250, F350, F450, F550 & F600 Super Duty Pickup and Chassis Cab
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Oil?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 12, 2017 | 11:01 AM
  #16  
ROADRUNNER1's Avatar
ROADRUNNER1
Senior User
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 124
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by TrikeDawg
Here is the latest list of approved oil from Ford.
Just hit the search button and all of the oil will be shown.
https://www.fcsdchemicalsandlubrican...archdiesel.asp

Why does the list specifically say CK-4 on some oils and not on the other oils listed. Rotella said they are working to get approval from Ford and sure enough their CK-4 oils aren't listed. If the list doesn't say CK-4 next to the oil, then I'm safely assuming the oil listed is CJ-4.
 
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2017 | 11:45 AM
  #17  
DHWelder83's Avatar
DHWelder83
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
That was a good catch Roadrunner. I agree with that. Better safe than sorry.
 
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2017 | 12:26 PM
  #18  
FishOnOne's Avatar
FishOnOne
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,912
Likes: 2,637
From: The Great State of Texas
Originally Posted by ROADRUNNER1
Why does the list specifically say CK-4 on some oils and not on the other oils listed. Rotella said they are working to get approval from Ford and sure enough their CK-4 oils aren't listed. If the list doesn't say CK-4 next to the oil, then I'm safely assuming the oil listed is CJ-4.

Rotella CK4 oils that are Ford approved:


T4 10W30
T5 15W40
 
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2017 | 12:45 PM
  #19  
ROADRUNNER1's Avatar
ROADRUNNER1
Senior User
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 124
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Troy Buenger
Rotella CK4 oils that are Ford approved:


T4 10W30
T5 15W40
I'm sorry if I'm missing something, but where does it say those are CK-4 approved oils? The list isn't titled "Approved CK-4 oils"

With a video from Ford saying don't use CK-4 oils, why would I assume those listed above are approved CK-4 oils. Like I said, some do specifically say CK-4 approved, but those above do not.
 
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2017 | 01:34 PM
  #20  
Boilermaker374's Avatar
Boilermaker374
More Turbo
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 633
Likes: 42
Originally Posted by ROADRUNNER1
I'm sorry if I'm missing something, but where does it say those are CK-4 approved oils? The list isn't titled "Approved CK-4 oils"
WSS-M2C171-F1
This is ford's specification number for CK4 oils.

So the brands and weighs listed is approved CK4 formulas.
 
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2017 | 02:05 PM
  #21  
kcwolf200's Avatar
kcwolf200
Junior User
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
While I'm glad that Ford may be stating that this new certification is not good for our engines, I think they should do a better job of informing people. I think this forum is fantastic and I have learned a TON on here, but what about the people that buy these trucks and aren't on here? They have no idea and just go pick up whatever is on the shelf without knowing any of the information on this thread.

Ford should have sent out a letter to everyone that bought one of these trucks about this. Just my $0.02.
 
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2017 | 03:28 PM
  #22  
oklarado's Avatar
oklarado
Posting Guru
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 1,056
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by kcwolf200
While I'm glad that Ford may be stating that this new certification is not good for our engines, I think they should do a better job of informing people. I think this forum is fantastic and I have learned a TON on here, but what about the people that buy these trucks and aren't on here? They have no idea and just go pick up whatever is on the shelf without knowing any of the information on this thread.

Ford should have sent out a letter to everyone that bought one of these trucks about this. Just my $0.02.
I agree. I wonder how many quickie lube shops are putting in the wrong stuff.
 
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2017 | 04:23 PM
  #23  
EpicCowlick's Avatar
EpicCowlick
Post Fiend
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,158
Likes: 35
From: North of Salt Lake City
Originally Posted by kcwolf200
While I'm glad that Ford may be stating that this new certification is not good for our engines, I think they should do a better job of informing people. I think this forum is fantastic and I have learned a TON on here, but what about the people that buy these trucks and aren't on here? They have no idea and just go pick up whatever is on the shelf without knowing any of the information on this thread.

Ford should have sent out a letter to everyone that bought one of these trucks about this. Just my $0.02.
This is the difference between being a consumer and an informed consumer and I'm afraid the consumers are going to pay a heavy cost for real-world testing of CK-4 oils in engines that were designed for CJ-4. This is one of those things that I really hate about the gubmint. They mandate obsolescence of a critical mechanical component so the total system will fail sooner and all consumers will have to spend money to purchase a narrowly better system. It just seems wrong to completely remove CJ-4 oils from a market that is dependent upon them and state so cavalierly that the CK-4 will work even better. Ford's own testing showed this to be completely untrue when their test engines started wearing out sooner than they should have. What a bunch of horse crap. Eventually Ford will have to be a team player with the bureaucrats probably under threat or else.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Mar 12, 2017 | 05:12 PM
  #24  
jschira's Avatar
jschira
Logistics Pro
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,788
Likes: 20
From: Mansfield, TX USA
Originally Posted by EpicCowlick
This is one of those things that I really hate about the gubmint. They mandate obsolescence of a critical mechanical component so the total system will fail sooner and all consumers will have to spend money to purchase a narrowly better system.
The CK-4 designation has nothing to do with the government, local, city, state or federal.

This has to do with an industry trade group trying to make their products better.

And no one is mandating anything. Manufacturers can still make CH-4 if they want to, but no one will buy it. When was the last time you owned a car recommending 10w-40 oil? For me, probably a decade or more. But they still sell it, because someone is still buying it.

So if there was a market for CH-4, they would still be selling it. If they are not selling it, it is because no one is buying it. Supply and demand, not the government.
 
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2017 | 05:17 PM
  #25  
Boilermaker374's Avatar
Boilermaker374
More Turbo
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 633
Likes: 42
Originally Posted by jschira
The CK-4 designation has nothing to do with the government, local, city, state or federal.

This has to do with an industry trade group trying to make their products there better.
So why the change if the EPA or some branch of the govmint ,don't have their finger in the pie.
 
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2017 | 05:17 PM
  #26  
MSDeltasleeper's Avatar
MSDeltasleeper
Cross-Country
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
What about the oil that has CK-4 AND CJ-4 on the jug?
 
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2017 | 05:29 PM
  #27  
System's Avatar
System
Prolocutor
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 13,618
Likes: 1,245
From: Western MA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by MSDeltasleeper
What about the oil that has CK-4 AND CJ-4 on the jug?
It's only CK4 but they put both because CK4 is "supposed" to be backwards compatible. It is not according to Ford.
 
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2017 | 05:30 PM
  #28  
jschira's Avatar
jschira
Logistics Pro
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,788
Likes: 20
From: Mansfield, TX USA
Originally Posted by Boilermaker374
So why the change if the EPA or some branch of the govmint ,don't have their finger in the pie.
I am not here to convince of what you have already decided otherwise.

If you want to believe that Mobil1 does not meet Ford specs because of some government conspiracy, then please go ahead.
 
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2017 | 05:37 PM
  #29  
jschira's Avatar
jschira
Logistics Pro
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,788
Likes: 20
From: Mansfield, TX USA
From the API website explaining the benefits of CK-4 oils over CJ-4:

[CK-4] oils are especially effective at sustaining emission control system durability where particulate filters and other advanced aftertreatment systems are used. API CK-4 oils are designed to provide enhanced protection against oil oxidation, viscosity loss due to shear, and oil aeration as well as protection against catalyst poisoning, particulate filter blocking, engine wear, piston deposits, degradation of low- and high-temperature properties, and soot-related viscosity increase.
 
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2017 | 05:42 PM
  #30  
System's Avatar
System
Prolocutor
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 13,618
Likes: 1,245
From: Western MA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by jschira
From the API website explaining the benefits of CK-4 oils over CJ-4:
Um, you forgot to copy and past the part that said...

"CK4 is a new API diesel engine oil-service category, designed to help meet federal greenhouse gas/fuel economy standards, which have a final phase-in date set for model year 2018 trucks..."
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:26 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE