Notices
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Dentsides Ford Truck
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Moser

MASTER CYLINDER COMPATIBILITY

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 14, 2017 | 01:41 PM
  #16  
ultraranger's Avatar
ultraranger
Lead Driver
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 6,399
Likes: 40
From: El Dorado, Arkansas
Originally Posted by N2S3
Steve, the parts you used seem to be new. What are the exact part numbers and where to buy these? would it work with a 1977 F150, disc front and drum at rear?
The booster seems new too.
I'm currently at work but, when I get home this evening, I'll give you the part numbers/sources for the components I used.
 
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2017 | 04:33 PM
  #17  
ultraranger's Avatar
ultraranger
Lead Driver
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 6,399
Likes: 40
From: El Dorado, Arkansas
The booster is a dual diaphragm (long input rod design) for a '75 F350. I traded my wrecking yard core booster in on a newly rebuilt booster. It can be purchased through NAPA, O'Reilly's and from various other parts places locally or online. The part number is 54-73112. --this booster is for a non-bellcrank bracket assembly.

BrakeBest Brakes 54-73112 - Power Brake Booster | O'Reilly Auto Parts

The '95 Explorer MC is a brand new item that can also be purchased from various parts stores. I bought mine through NAPA under part number M3246.

https://www.napaonline.com/p/NMAM3246
 
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2017 | 05:26 PM
  #18  
ultraranger's Avatar
ultraranger
Lead Driver
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 6,399
Likes: 40
From: El Dorado, Arkansas
....IF you have a large diameter (approximately 11" diameter) single diaphragm booster mounted to a bellcrank bracket assembly like this:



You can swap out the short input single diaphragm booster for a short input rod dual diaphragm booster (part number 54-73311) like this:

BrakeBest Brakes 54-73311 - Power Brake Booster | O'Reilly Auto Parts
 
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2017 | 07:34 AM
  #19  
bowtieman55's Avatar
bowtieman55
Senior User
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 162
Likes: 1
From: Elizabeth City, NC
This is a neat swap/upgrade. Where did you get the fancy new brake lines?
 
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2017 | 10:31 AM
  #20  
ultraranger's Avatar
ultraranger
Lead Driver
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 6,399
Likes: 40
From: El Dorado, Arkansas
Originally Posted by bowtieman55
This is a neat swap/upgrade. Where did you get the fancy new brake lines?
IF this question is directed at me, I fabricated the lines from straight 60" sticks of 3/16" steel brake tubing.
 
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2017 | 11:01 AM
  #21  
EQCMCAT's Avatar
EQCMCAT
Thread Starter
|
Laughing Gas
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 854
Likes: 63
From: Oxnard
ultraranger,


Great information you provided, thank you. After doing some limited research on this subject, I'd like to ask you.


I see that on my 77 F-150 Master Cylinder (MC) the Bore Size indicates 1 inch and a 1992 Ford Explorer's MC is also 1 inch. The Bore Size on for my 1993 F-150 is 1 1/8 inch, will the 1 1/8 inch bore size MC work on my 77 F-150?


Reason I'm asking, because I got an extra MC in the shed for my 1993 F-150.


Lastly, the two wire pigtail for the new modern plastic MC, where do they get hooked up to in my 77 F-150? Thanks for your time W/my questions.


Don
 
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2017 | 02:10 PM
  #22  
ultraranger's Avatar
ultraranger
Lead Driver
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 6,399
Likes: 40
From: El Dorado, Arkansas
Originally Posted by EQCMCAT
ultraranger,


Great information you provided, thank you. After doing some limited research on this subject, I'd like to ask you.


I see that on my 77 F-150 Master Cylinder (MC) the Bore Size indicates 1 inch and a 1992 Ford Explorer's MC is also 1 inch. The Bore Size on for my 1993 F-150 is 1 1/8 inch, will the 1 1/8 inch bore size MC work on my 77 F-150?


Reason I'm asking, because I got an extra MC in the shed for my 1993 F-150.


Lastly, the two wire pigtail for the new modern plastic MC, where do they get hooked up to in my 77 F-150? Thanks for your time W/my questions.


Don
I don't know what booster you have (bellcrank style or non-bellcrank style) but, with a 1.00" bore MC, I'll assume you have a single diaphragm brake booster --possibly the 11" bellcrank style(?).

Going from a 1.00" diameter bore to a 1-1/8" bore will be a big jump. Going up in MC bore diameter will mean an increase in the force it takes on the brake pedal to get the same amount of braking action from the 1.00" bore MC.

Smaller MC bores will produce more output pressure than a larger MC bore, for a given amount of force applied to the brake pedal. A smaller bore MC will have a longer pedal travel. A larger bore MC will have less forward travel of the brake pedal.

Once you progressively go above a 1.00" bore MC, it becomes increasingly more difficult to comfortably apply enough force on the brake pedal to get the vehicle to come to a stop within a reasonable distance.

It's also more difficult to apply sufficient force on the brake pedal, with a MC that has a bore larger than 1.00" that's mounted to a single diaphragm booster.

The '93 F150 MC will have ports that exit on the right side of the MC body (if that matters to you). The other thing with it is the primary port is an M18 x 1.50 metric size. This is intended to screw a separate proportioning valve into this port that's designed to plumb to an ABS unit --something your Dentside wouldn't have. The add-on '93 F150 factory proportioning valve that goes into this port is about $50.00 dollars or higher (about the cost or more of the MC itself).

I didn't hook up the float level on my MC because it's a simple matter when you're under the hood to just glance over at the MC and you can see how much brake fluid is in it, without having to take the cap off. If you wanted to tie the float into the brake warning light, I'm sure there's probably a wiring diagram showing the pin-out to be able to wire the float in parallel to the existing pressure differential valve switch.
 
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2017 | 04:04 PM
  #23  
EQCMCAT's Avatar
EQCMCAT
Thread Starter
|
Laughing Gas
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 854
Likes: 63
From: Oxnard
Steve,
You made complete sense, thanks for clarifying. When I get to this project (hopefully within the next month), I'll use a 92 Explorer's MC. Though do have a lingering question, are the 92 Explorer's MC thread size metric? Or will my 77 F-150 brake lines thread into the 92 Explorer's MC?


Don
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-2

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-5

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-7

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Feb 15, 2017 | 05:33 PM
  #24  
ultraranger's Avatar
ultraranger
Lead Driver
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 6,399
Likes: 40
From: El Dorado, Arkansas
Originally Posted by EQCMCAT
Steve,
You made complete sense, thanks for clarifying. When I get to this project (hopefully within the next month), I'll use a 92 Explorer's MC. Though do have a lingering question, are the 92 Explorer's MC thread size metric? Or will my 77 F-150 brake lines thread into the 92 Explorer's MC?


Don
The '92 1.00" bore Explorer MC will have the same M10 x 1.0 and M12 x 1.0 metric bubble flare fittings as on the 1-1/16" bore '95 Explorer MC I have.

Line fitting adapters don't make for professional looking installations. You can get the ISO metric bubble flare direct-connection fittings from Classic Tube.

The M10 x 1.0 fitting is part number ST8036.

The M12 x 1.0 fitting is part number ST8040.

You'll need to fabricate at least two lines between the MC and the existing disc/drum brake valve.

The only main feature about the pre-'95 Explorer/Ranger MC I'm not crazy about is its downward-sloping reservoir. It doesn't keep the MC from working but, it messes with my sense of symmetry and things being balanced and level looking.

If you don't like the sloping reservoir, there is a service replacement (that's shaped much like the reservoir on my MC) for a 1999 Ranger MC that's more level and could be swapped onto the '92 Explorer MC body.

https://www.carid.com/1999-ford-rang...-45332729.html


....there's also the option to run a '99-'04 SN95 V6 Mustang MC. It will have a 1.00" bore and a level reservoir. The only main difference is the ports on it exit off to the right side. ('94-'98 SN95 V6 Mustang MCs had a 1-1/16" bore with right hand ports and a level reservoir).
 
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2017 | 11:40 PM
  #25  
bowtieman55's Avatar
bowtieman55
Senior User
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 162
Likes: 1
From: Elizabeth City, NC
Originally Posted by ultraranger
IF this question is directed at me, I fabricated the lines from straight 60" sticks of 3/16" steel brake tubing.

Yessir. They look AMAZING; that's definitely something I won't be attempting.
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2017 | 07:44 AM
  #26  
ultraranger's Avatar
ultraranger
Lead Driver
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 6,399
Likes: 40
From: El Dorado, Arkansas
Originally Posted by bowtieman55
Yessir. They look AMAZING; that's definitely something I won't be attempting.
Thanks. Flaring/bending brake tubing isn't some black magic voo-doo art. If you know some simple preparation steps, it's pretty easy to accomplish.

https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1...-boosters.html
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2017 | 05:37 PM
  #27  
EQCMCAT's Avatar
EQCMCAT
Thread Starter
|
Laughing Gas
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 854
Likes: 63
From: Oxnard
ultraranger,
After reading more of what you provided last June 23, 2016, I'm confident now I got the source and part numbers information needed to perform the modern master cylinder conversation on my 77 F-150. Although I'm not familiar W/bubble flares, so I'll Google the subject and determine if my double flaring tool is capable of making them, or if I'll need to buy something additional to perform bubble flares.
At any rate, the information you provided is unquestionably first rate. Thank you again.
Don
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2017 | 06:04 PM
  #28  
F250_Super_4X4's Avatar
F250_Super_4X4
Laughing Gas
5 Year Member
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 466
From: Tennessee
If I'm not mistaken 45deg double flares will do
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Fordtruck51
1961 - 1963 F100 Unibody
3
Apr 29, 2012 10:46 PM
DJOHAGIN
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
5
Nov 15, 2006 11:20 PM
WillyB
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
1
Sep 15, 2005 08:27 PM
maxwellthefatcat
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
4
Nov 10, 2002 06:59 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:18 PM.

story-0
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-4
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-6
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-7
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-8
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE