2017 6.2 MPG - Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums

Notices
6.2L V8 Discuss the 6.2L V8

2017 6.2 MPG

Reply

 
 
 
  #1  
Old 01-06-2017, 09:31 AM
RainDesert's Avatar
RainDesert
RainDesert is offline
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,353
RainDesert has a good reputation on FTE.RainDesert has a good reputation on FTE.RainDesert has a good reputation on FTE.
2017 6.2 MPG

I've been posting in other threads, but I will just post here from now on. Hopefully others will and we can see if there is any real mpg improvement on the new SD.

Truck: 250 CCSB 4x4 4.30 running 295/70/18 Michelin Defender LTX.
Last tank, 329.3 miles, 24.523 gallons = 13.44
This tank was coming home over the pass, driving around town for the 2nd half of the tank. 95% of time the hubs were locked, lots of miles in 4x4, considerable extra idling because it's been so dang cold here lately.
 
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-06-2017, 01:17 PM
82_F100_300Six's Avatar
82_F100_300Six
82_F100_300Six is online now
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,926
82_F100_300Six has a very good reputation on FTE.82_F100_300Six has a very good reputation on FTE.82_F100_300Six has a very good reputation on FTE.82_F100_300Six has a very good reputation on FTE.
Thanks RD are you in Oregon covered in snow and ice? For some reason I thought you were around las Vegas somewhere (I'm only on here on my phone so I don't see any details)
 
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-06-2017, 01:28 PM
RainDesert's Avatar
RainDesert
RainDesert is offline
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,353
RainDesert has a good reputation on FTE.RainDesert has a good reputation on FTE.RainDesert has a good reputation on FTE.
Yes in Corvallis OR. and I travel quite a bit to Bend. Lots of snow and ice this winter, more due for Saturday/Sunday.
 
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-06-2017, 02:10 PM
kry226
kry226 is online now
Elder User
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Germany
Posts: 536
kry226 is starting off with a positive reputation.
What's the average altitude where you are?

High altitudes can really tax a normally aspirated engine, so that information can provide good context with the observed mileage. Thanks.
 
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-06-2017, 04:05 PM
RainDesert's Avatar
RainDesert
RainDesert is offline
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,353
RainDesert has a good reputation on FTE.RainDesert has a good reputation on FTE.RainDesert has a good reputation on FTE.
I'm at around 400'.
 
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-07-2017, 01:51 AM
kry226
kry226 is online now
Elder User
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Germany
Posts: 536
kry226 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Originally Posted by RainDesert View Post
I'm at around 400'.
OK, thanks. Not that much, I guess. At least not enough to make an appreciable difference in the engine's performance.
 
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-07-2017, 09:10 AM
Glocksub
Glocksub is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 86
Glocksub is starting off with a positive reputation.
raindesert-your truck has a 48gal tank doesn't it? I thought I'd read somewhere that all crew cab gas trucks get the larger tank for the 2017 models, but I could be mistaken.....
 
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-07-2017, 09:17 AM
ATP Pilot's Avatar
ATP Pilot
ATP Pilot is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 536
ATP Pilot is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Originally Posted by Glocksub View Post
raindesert-your truck has a 48gal tank doesn't it? I thought I'd read somewhere that all crew cab gas trucks get the larger tank for the 2017 models, but I could be mistaken.....
only CC with LB get the large tank
 
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-07-2017, 09:21 AM
Glocksub
Glocksub is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 86
Glocksub is starting off with a positive reputation.
Ok I see. Ford's spec sheet on their site was a bit misleading last time I looked at that, but that was some time ago, they may have corrected it by now.
 
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-07-2017, 09:46 AM
RainDesert's Avatar
RainDesert
RainDesert is offline
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,353
RainDesert has a good reputation on FTE.RainDesert has a good reputation on FTE.RainDesert has a good reputation on FTE.
I have the 34. There is an issue and some threads talking about it in the 2017 section. My DTE alarm comes on, I can run it down to "0" miles until empty, and not even sqeeze in 30 gallons. Very annoying.
 
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-07-2017, 10:13 AM
Glocksub
Glocksub is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 86
Glocksub is starting off with a positive reputation.
I did see that thread in the 2017 section. Hopefully there will be a fix for that via Ford before too long, I agree that would be annoying. Ford's site is still incorrect on the specs for fuel capacity....
 
Attached Images  
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-14-2017, 08:55 AM
Addison86
Addison86 is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 67
Addison86 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Originally Posted by RainDesert View Post
I have the 34. There is an issue and some threads talking about it in the 2017 section. My DTE alarm comes on, I can run it down to "0" miles until empty, and not even sqeeze in 30 gallons. Very annoying.
I think that's just how Ford set them up, with a lot of reserve left after you hit zero. My '16 has a 40 gallon tank, but I can only put in 34 gallons when it's at 0 miles on the DTE. Maybe to make sure the fuel pump stays cool?
 
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-19-2017, 02:05 PM
snelldawg's Avatar
snelldawg
snelldawg is offline
Elder User
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Mad River Valley
Posts: 767
snelldawg is starting off with a positive reputation.
My 2005 and my 2012 both were the same, when I got the fuel warning message I had exactly 7 gallons left. Haven't figured out the '17 yet....
 
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-27-2017, 08:07 PM
RainDesert's Avatar
RainDesert
RainDesert is offline
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,353
RainDesert has a good reputation on FTE.RainDesert has a good reputation on FTE.RainDesert has a good reputation on FTE.
Pretty darn cold here as of late, quite a bit of extra idle and/or warm up time. Just did my usual mostly town tank this time came it at 343/28.1 gal = 12.2 mpgs. I have usually been at 12.8. I can say that I am up 15% over my prior 6.2 with this new one.
 
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-03-2017, 10:16 AM
SportCustom
SportCustom is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 53
SportCustom is starting off with a positive reputation.
I am ready to take the plunge on a F250 CC SB w/4.30 gears and this thread caught my attention. I have to decide whether to go 4wd or 2wd. I like the utility factor of 4wd, but the extra fuel economy with a 2wd might also be attractive. We don't camp off-road so 2wd with a locking rear differential would likely be fine, but be a limiting factor when unhooked for sight-seeing in remote areas on unimproved roads. I'll be pulling up to a 9500 lb. bumper pull RV and an extra 2 mpg would give me another 70 miles or so of range on those long stretches of highway.

So, a lot hinges on a comparisons between towing a TT with 2wd vs. 4wd.
 
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 2017 6.2 MPG


Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
 
  • Ask a Question
    Get answers from community experts
Question Title:
Description:
Your question will be posted in: