Notices

Slide-in + towing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 25, 2016 | 11:25 PM
  #16  
mrollings53's Avatar
mrollings53
Laughing Gas
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,227
Likes: 4
From: Washington
And, I'm sure a local fabricator can build one to those specs. My hitch extension cost less than $200, and I could use my existing receiver. At a significant savings from the $1000 to buy and install the Super hitch/truss system. I'm also positive it could handle more weight than I have to throw at it.
 
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2016 | 05:46 AM
  #17  
WE3ZS's Avatar
WE3ZS
Moderator
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,051
Likes: 1,549
From: Media PA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by mrollings53
And, I'm sure a local fabricator can build one to those specs. My hitch extension cost less than $200, and I could use my existing receiver. At a significant savings from the $1000 to buy and install the Super hitch/truss system. I'm also positive it could handle more weight than I have to throw at it.


I understand your point but.........With a heavier trailer, like the OP's the leverage applied by any hitch extension will almost certainly exceed the rating and capacity of the existing factory receiver hitch. That would be my primary concern with the OP's setup in question. I know it's expensive but special situations like this are where a product like Torklift's SuperHitch and Truss really shine. They are designed and built to handle those types of leverage amplified loads whereas the factory receiver is not.
I think your less costly setup is a great solution for the kind of weights that you have been working with and you are staying within the capacity of the factory receiver hitch, but a heavier load should have the entire hitching system scaled up along with the weights and leverages involved.
 
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2016 | 08:38 AM
  #18  
Sancho's Avatar
Sancho
Tuned
20 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 264
Likes: 4
From: Ak
I'll be the opposition here. Find a nice short bed camper and add a nice large tent. What is your trucks payload? With the long cantilever, you might have some problems.
 
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2016 | 10:54 AM
  #19  
bobv60's Avatar
bobv60
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,866
Likes: 84
From: Rainier OR
Originally Posted by mrollings53
And, I'm sure a local fabricator can build one to those specs. My hitch extension cost less than $200, and I could use my existing receiver. At a significant savings from the $1000 to buy and install the Super hitch/truss system. I'm also positive it could handle more weight than I have to throw at it.
And the super truss has side supper chains to help with the sidea to side loads on the hitch. It REALLY comes down to the size of the csmper AND the camper COG (center of gravity). If the camper COG is back behind the rear axle, easy to do because of the short bed, and a long extention on the hitch, with its leverage, the front axle could start to become light.
It is doable however, the RIGHT camper is out there, but it will have to be a light one with very little over hang. That's a heavy trailer to be pulling with an extention, but if the extention is under 2' I think it will be ok.
 
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2016 | 12:20 PM
  #20  
Ziggy81's Avatar
Ziggy81
Thread Starter
|
5th Wheeling
10 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 35
Likes: 5
I created a thread out on rv.net forum and they also been providing some pretty good feedback. It's looking like with a bigwig sway bar, airbags, and maybe some tires with the right newer light tc I'll be pretty good.
https://www.rv.net/forum/index.cfm/fuseaction/thread/tid/29136175.cfm
 
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2016 | 01:08 PM
  #21  
redmt79's Avatar
redmt79
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
From: Montana
Originally Posted by Ziggy81
I created a thread out on rv.net forum and they also been providing some pretty good feedback. It's looking like with a bigwig sway bar, airbags, and maybe some tires with the right newer light tc I'll be pretty good.
https://www.rv.net/forum/index.cfm/f...d/29136175.cfm
Good thread as I am in the same situation, potentially pulling a car hauler loaded with my early Bronco. So far the campers we have looked at (used) are a Palomino pop-up and a Six-Pac D650 hard side. Both were self contained. I think the Palomino weighed 1600# and the Six-Pac was just shy of 1900#. Based on my measurements neither would require a hitch extension for my trailer. But I haven't pulled the trigger on anything yet and appreciate your search for options.
 
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2016 | 01:50 PM
  #22  
llblake64's Avatar
llblake64
Senior User
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 192
Likes: 52
We're also going the TC route after several years in a Class A. We ordered our truck with an eye towards just enough room in the cab, maximizing floor space in the camper with minimal overhang, and maximizing payload rating. Sticker on the door jamb gives a rating of 4478#.

Take off 800# for tongue weight of our trailer and Jeep and we're left with almost 3700# for us, the dog, and a camper loaded for an off-road weekend. We're looking at campers with dry weights of 2600# or less so we shouldn't have any issues.
 
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2016 | 08:06 AM
  #23  
JeepMD's Avatar
JeepMD
New User
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Truck Camper in Short Bed with Bumper Pull

Name:  Truck Camper Jeep.jpg
Views: 3719
Size:  3.08 MB

Here's my set up with a short bed.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-3

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-5

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-9

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
Old Dec 29, 2016 | 03:20 PM
  #24  
Ziggy81's Avatar
Ziggy81
Thread Starter
|
5th Wheeling
10 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 35
Likes: 5
Originally Posted by JeepMD
Attachment 168905

Here's my set up with a short bed.
Nice looking setup. Pretty much exactly what I'mooking to do but I'd go for a bigger camper if I can manage it.
 
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2016 | 09:26 PM
  #25  
ExcursionPSD's Avatar
ExcursionPSD
Senior User
25 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 185
Likes: 2
From: Milwauke WI
Originally Posted by llblake64
We're also going the TC route after several years in a Class A. We ordered our truck with an eye towards just enough room in the cab, maximizing floor space in the camper with minimal overhang, and maximizing payload rating. Sticker on the door jamb gives a rating of 4478#.

Take off 800# for tongue weight of our trailer and Jeep and we're left with almost 3700# for us, the dog, and a camper loaded for an off-road weekend. We're looking at campers with dry weights of 2600# or less so we shouldn't have any issues.
Your front and rear Gross Axle Weight Rating GAWR is on the sticker on your driver's side B pillar. With a slide-in camper AND a bumper pull trailer WITHOUT a weight distributing hitch, you need to be paying attention to not exceeding the rear GAWR, as well as the Tow Vehicle overall GVR.

Your F350 SuperCab with long box has a 158" wheelbase, depending on what you use for a ball mount, the ball for the tongue of the trailer will be about 60" behind the rear axle.

The 800 pounds of tongue weight, 60" behind the rear axle will lift up some weight off the front axle, and that transfer will be added to the rear axle.

This is the formula for how much transfer there will be:

60 / 158 = 38% (percent of transfer from front axle to rear axle)

38% x 800 = 304 pounds transferred from front axle to rear.

Add that to the tongue weight, and the rear axle will have...

800 + 304 = 1104 pounds added weight to rear axle.

---

Putting an extension on the ball mount (to clear the overhang on a slide-in camper), will increase the distance from the tow ball to the rear axle, and putting that distance into the weight transfer formula, shows there would be even more weight transferred from the front axle to the rear axle.
 
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2016 | 07:31 AM
  #26  
llblake64's Avatar
llblake64
Senior User
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 192
Likes: 52
Originally Posted by ExcursionPSD
Your front and rear Gross Axle Weight Rating GAWR is on the sticker on your driver's side B pillar. With a slide-in camper AND a bumper pull trailer WITHOUT a weight distributing hitch, you need to be paying attention to not exceeding the rear GAWR, as well as the Tow Vehicle overall GVR.

Your F350 SuperCab with long box has a 158" wheelbase, depending on what you use for a ball mount, the ball for the tongue of the trailer will be about 60" behind the rear axle.

The 800 pounds of tongue weight, 60" behind the rear axle will lift up some weight off the front axle, and that transfer will be added to the rear axle.

This is the formula for how much transfer there will be:

60 / 158 = 38% (percent of transfer from front axle to rear axle)

38% x 800 = 304 pounds transferred from front axle to rear.

Add that to the tongue weight, and the rear axle will have...

800 + 304 = 1104 pounds added weight to rear axle.

---

Putting an extension on the ball mount (to clear the overhang on a slide-in camper), will increase the distance from the tow ball to the rear axle, and putting that distance into the weight transfer formula, shows there would be even more weight transferred from the front axle to the rear axle.
All factors taken into consideration and very good info for anyone looking to carry a TC and pull a vehicle trailer.

The dimensions have changed a bit for the 2017 SD. The wheelbase for the SuperCab w/ long box is 164.2" and the rear overhang is 52". That reduces the percentage in your calculation. The GAWR for the rear axle is 7230#.

That 800# tongue weight is my working estimate and is higher than the actual weight in order to build in a margin. The trailer and Jeep combined actually weigh around 6500#.

Also, we are specifically looking at a camper with minimal overhang so that a hitch extension won't be necessary. These campers also have their water tanks forward of the rear axle. That will help to counteract the effects of the hitch weight.
 
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2016 | 09:14 AM
  #27  
meborder's Avatar
meborder
Moderator
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 6,509
Likes: 662
From: Sioux Falls Area
Club FTE Gold Member
Using those numbers above, for every 100lbs of hitch weight, 32 lbs is transferred from the front axle to the rear. So if your hitch weight is 650lbs, the rear axle is carrying 865 lbs (the 650 from the trailer, plus 206 transferred from the front)

Adding a 1 foot extension to the hitch bumps that up to 39 lbs per hundred on the hitch. So at 650, the rear axle is carrying 903 lbs and the front gets lighter by 250.

Adding a 2 foot extension bumps it to 46 lbs per hundred on the hitch.
So at 650, the rear is now carrying 950.

I'd keep an eye on your RAWR if you plan to use an extension. Figure out your loaded weight of the camper, and add 1,000 to that for the hitch weight if you need a 2ft extension.

Me... I'd talk to a welding shop and ask about extending the tongue before using an extension. I can't even imagine how the weight hanging off the back of the truck that far would affect vehicle dynamics. I can see sway being an issue, but I could be wrong.

I'd get a smaller camper before an extension.
 
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2016 | 09:35 AM
  #28  
llblake64's Avatar
llblake64
Senior User
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 192
Likes: 52
Again, looking at a camper with minimal overhang so no extension will be used. Even if I did plan for 1000# of effective weight for the trailer, that leaves us nearly 3500# since our payload rating is 4478#. The rear GAWR is 7230#, more than enough for what we're talking about here.
 
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2016 | 11:51 AM
  #29  
meborder's Avatar
meborder
Moderator
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 6,509
Likes: 662
From: Sioux Falls Area
Club FTE Gold Member
Strictly speaking, a good share of that 4400 lbs is going to be on the front axle and it is going to be hard to get that weight up front.

Looking at the tech data, the empty rear weight is about 2750. So you can put that 4400 on the rear axle without going over RAWR, but you might be over GVWR.

It's just something to be aware of, that's all. If you bought a 3500 lbs camper and then load up a trailer with an extension, you could easily put too much on the rear axle.
 
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2016 | 12:56 PM
  #30  
llblake64's Avatar
llblake64
Senior User
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 192
Likes: 52
Originally Posted by meborder
Strictly speaking, a good share of that 4400 lbs is going to be on the front axle and it is going to be hard to get that weight up front.

Looking at the tech data, the empty rear weight is about 2750. So you can put that 4400 on the rear axle without going over RAWR, but you might be over GVWR.

It's just something to be aware of, that's all. If you bought a 3500 lbs camper and then load up a trailer with an extension, you could easily put too much on the rear axle.
I understand that folks are just trying to be helpful. This has been researched thoroughly for nearly a year and we spec'd our truck to maximize payload while giving us the space (both in the cab and in the camper) that we wanted. I would have been happy with a payload rating of 4000#, was thrilled to see the 4478#.

With the dry weight of the campers we're looking at we won't exceed either the GVWR (11,500#) or the rear GAWR (7230#). There won't be a hitch extension so there won't be any additional leverage effect from the hitch load sitting further behind the rear axle. All factors have been taken into account and calculated multiple times, I'm kind of maniacal when it comes to researching things like this.

I think there is some great information in this thread for anyone just starting out the planning process. This one thread could have saved me months of research earlier this year. I hope the OP got all the info he needed to make a well informed decision.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:44 PM.

story-0
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-2
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-4
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-5
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-6
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-8
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE