Notices
6.2L V8 Discuss the 6.2L V8

6.2 less powerful than ecoboost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 4, 2016 | 12:16 PM
  #1  
82_F100_300Six's Avatar
82_F100_300Six
Thread Starter
|
Cargo Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,875
Likes: 30
6.2 less powerful than ecoboost

Our beloved powerplant is getting picked on

From 4 Wheel & Off-Road February 2017

Frankly I couldn't care less. My hat is off to technology as I read or heard that the ecoboost is more powerful than the 7.3. More power to em.
 
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2016 | 01:35 PM
  #2  
Chuck's First Ford's Avatar
Chuck's First Ford
Postmaster
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 4,392
Likes: 22
From: very South Texas
but, will it still be alive after 200,000 miles of towing?
 
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2016 | 02:28 PM
  #3  
gstanfield's Avatar
gstanfield
Senior User
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 176
Likes: 3
From: Wyoming, USA
Exactly! It's very common for a heavy use engine to be under-stressed while a performance engine is over-stressed. The goal is to do the work and last a long time.

If you're buying a 6.2 Superduty looking for performance then you are sadly misguided. Either get a lighter truck or get a diesel with twice the torque. The point of an engine like the 6.2 is to last a long time without the added maintenance of the diesel and to have enough power to get the job done.

I've seen turbocharged Hayabusa motorcycle engines putting down 600+ HP from a 1300CC engine, don't think I'd want one in my truck.


The technology in the ecoboost is great and the new GM/Ford 10 speed will likely be a great transmission for it's intended use. If I didn't have need to tow and haul heavy stuff I'd probably get a F150 Ecoboost for a family truck, but I need something to haul heavy for many years.
 
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2016 | 06:14 PM
  #4  
snickers104's Avatar
snickers104
Junior User
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: Cimarron, KS
Originally Posted by gstanfield
Exactly! It's very common for a heavy use engine to be under-stressed while a performance engine is over-stressed. The goal is to do the work and last a long time.

If you're buying a 6.2 Superduty looking for performance then you are sadly misguided. Either get a lighter truck or get a diesel with twice the torque. The point of an engine like the 6.2 is to last a long time without the added maintenance of the diesel and to have enough power to get the job done.

I've seen turbocharged Hayabusa motorcycle engines putting down 600+ HP from a 1300CC engine, don't think I'd want one in my truck.


The technology in the ecoboost is great and the new GM/Ford 10 speed will likely be a great transmission for it's intended use. If I didn't have need to tow and haul heavy stuff I'd probably get a F150 Ecoboost for a family truck, but I need something to haul heavy for many years.

I agree with this!!!! The 6.2 is great for its intended purpose.
 
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2016 | 09:40 PM
  #5  
mikereidjr's Avatar
mikereidjr
Mountain Pass
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 241
Likes: 6
The only complaint I had is that I wish it was faster off the line, but then I remember that it's not a race car.... :-)
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2016 | 10:49 AM
  #6  
krewat's Avatar
krewat
FTE Leadership Emeritus
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 42,561
Likes: 423
From: Long Island USA
Club FTE Gold Member
They're comparing the Raptor 6.2 with the new Ecoboost. Not a Superduty
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2016 | 04:26 PM
  #7  
bykr's Avatar
bykr
Junior User
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
I've got a SHO EcoBoost Taurus with a tune that puts out over 430hp and no way would I want to tow a car trailer with it. That torque peak is probably way up in rpm range. My 6.2 has way more grunt down low.
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2016 | 04:37 PM
  #8  
krewat's Avatar
krewat
FTE Leadership Emeritus
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 42,561
Likes: 423
From: Long Island USA
Club FTE Gold Member
A stock Ecoboost in a SHO has a flat torque curve from around 1200-5500RPM. Because yours is tuned, the power is all up top.

Previous model EB, your mileage-may-vary caveat:



That's the F150 I'm assuming, and the previous EB, not the current one they are putting in the Raptor. I wouldn't say it makes all it's torque "up top"
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-2

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-5

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-7

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Dec 5, 2016 | 11:00 PM
  #9  
bykr's Avatar
bykr
Junior User
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
That torque curve is pretty amazing for the EcoBoost, but I'm also thinking that the Raptor EB torque comes in much higher.
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2016 | 05:26 AM
  #10  
Slowpoke Slim's Avatar
Slowpoke Slim
Laughing Gas
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,169
Likes: 29
From: Bismarck, ND
Well,

I've shown that magazine article to my truck, and we had a long talk about it. My truck seems to agree with me that it thinks it can still pull my 5th wheel around.

*Ok, sarcasm mode disengaged. *

The Raptor is a toy for the Ricky Racer types to run around like idiots in. The Super Duty is a truck, for grown ups to do truck type work stuff with.
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2016 | 06:05 AM
  #11  
john hardy's Avatar
john hardy
Senior User
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
They should have gave the 6.2 a longer stroke for more torque.
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2016 | 07:39 AM
  #12  
Chuck's First Ford's Avatar
Chuck's First Ford
Postmaster
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 4,392
Likes: 22
From: very South Texas
bring back Steam power.. max torque at 1 rpm.
a 4884 can spin all of its driver wheels pulling millions of pounds


Never Mind. way to much daily work.......
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2016 | 10:14 AM
  #13  
Ron94150's Avatar
Ron94150
Postmaster
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 3,146
Likes: 32
From: Maryville, TN
Originally Posted by john hardy
They should have gave the 6.2 a longer stroke for more torque and made the internals stonger. Instead they make a high reving motor only good for 450 HP. Dumb move on fords part!
Hey John, you bought that 6.7 yet? You are really in the minority hating your 6.2, I've been stuck in vehicles I really didn't like after buying them for one reason or the other, and it sucks. Just go buy it, I've found it's easier to ask the wife for forgiveness than permission.

With the stroke, it sounds like you want a 5.4 towing experience, which sucked on the interstate. No manufacture has built a gas motor that will tow 12k pounds and be able to hit the hills without revving and hold a hi way speed.

The 450hp max came from a livernois ad trying to sale a racing short block. I don't buy it for a minute. But the fact is, what are you going to do with your motor to get more than 450 hp out of it other than a supercharger? It would be cheaper to buy the diesel option, and if you have to coin to buy the supercharger, you should have the coin to maintain the diesel.
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2016 | 10:23 AM
  #14  
RainDesert's Avatar
RainDesert
Cargo Master
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 39
From: Boise
For those who don't follow the 2017 SD and the updated 6.2, it is now producing 430 lbft at 3800 rpms. The first gen 6.2 that most have is at 405 lbft at 4500. So Ford has improved the 6.2 for torque.
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2016 | 10:51 AM
  #15  
john hardy's Avatar
john hardy
Senior User
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
The 6.2 does have a long stroke, the 5.4 is longer. The stroke of the 5.4 is 4.17 inches the 6.2 is 3.74 inches.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:29 PM.

story-0
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 10:59:05


VIEW MORE
story-2
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-4
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-6
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-7
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-8
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE