6.2 less powerful than ecoboost - Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums

Notices
6.2L V8 Discuss the 6.2L V8

6.2 less powerful than ecoboost

Reply

 
 
 
  #1  
Old 12-04-2016, 12:16 PM
82_F100_300Six's Avatar
82_F100_300Six
82_F100_300Six is online now
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,926
82_F100_300Six has a very good reputation on FTE.82_F100_300Six has a very good reputation on FTE.82_F100_300Six has a very good reputation on FTE.82_F100_300Six has a very good reputation on FTE.
6.2 less powerful than ecoboost

Our beloved powerplant is getting picked on

From 4 Wheel & Off-Road February 2017

Frankly I couldn't care less. My hat is off to technology as I read or heard that the ecoboost is more powerful than the 7.3. More power to em.
 
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-04-2016, 01:35 PM
Chuck's First Ford
Chuck's First Ford is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Upper Right oHIo
Posts: 3,600
Chuck's First Ford has a very good reputation on FTE.Chuck's First Ford has a very good reputation on FTE.Chuck's First Ford has a very good reputation on FTE.
but, will it still be alive after 200,000 miles of towing?
 
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-04-2016, 02:28 PM
gstanfield's Avatar
gstanfield
gstanfield is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Wyoming, USA
Posts: 175
gstanfield is starting off with a positive reputation.
Exactly! It's very common for a heavy use engine to be under-stressed while a performance engine is over-stressed. The goal is to do the work and last a long time.

If you're buying a 6.2 Superduty looking for performance then you are sadly misguided. Either get a lighter truck or get a diesel with twice the torque. The point of an engine like the 6.2 is to last a long time without the added maintenance of the diesel and to have enough power to get the job done.

I've seen turbocharged Hayabusa motorcycle engines putting down 600+ HP from a 1300CC engine, don't think I'd want one in my truck.


The technology in the ecoboost is great and the new GM/Ford 10 speed will likely be a great transmission for it's intended use. If I didn't have need to tow and haul heavy stuff I'd probably get a F150 Ecoboost for a family truck, but I need something to haul heavy for many years.
 
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-04-2016, 06:14 PM
snickers104's Avatar
snickers104
snickers104 is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Cimarron, KS
Posts: 69
snickers104 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Originally Posted by gstanfield View Post
Exactly! It's very common for a heavy use engine to be under-stressed while a performance engine is over-stressed. The goal is to do the work and last a long time.

If you're buying a 6.2 Superduty looking for performance then you are sadly misguided. Either get a lighter truck or get a diesel with twice the torque. The point of an engine like the 6.2 is to last a long time without the added maintenance of the diesel and to have enough power to get the job done.

I've seen turbocharged Hayabusa motorcycle engines putting down 600+ HP from a 1300CC engine, don't think I'd want one in my truck.


The technology in the ecoboost is great and the new GM/Ford 10 speed will likely be a great transmission for it's intended use. If I didn't have need to tow and haul heavy stuff I'd probably get a F150 Ecoboost for a family truck, but I need something to haul heavy for many years.

I agree with this!!!! The 6.2 is great for its intended purpose.
 
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-04-2016, 09:40 PM
mikereidjr's Avatar
mikereidjr
mikereidjr is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 197
mikereidjr is starting off with a positive reputation.
The only complaint I had is that I wish it was faster off the line, but then I remember that it's not a race car.... :-)
 
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-05-2016, 10:49 AM
Krewat's Avatar
Krewat
Krewat is offline
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Long Island USA
Posts: 38,453
Krewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputation
They're comparing the Raptor 6.2 with the new Ecoboost. Not a Superduty
 
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-05-2016, 04:26 PM
bykr
bykr is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 62
bykr is starting off with a positive reputation.
I've got a SHO EcoBoost Taurus with a tune that puts out over 430hp and no way would I want to tow a car trailer with it. That torque peak is probably way up in rpm range. My 6.2 has way more grunt down low.
 
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-05-2016, 04:37 PM
Krewat's Avatar
Krewat
Krewat is offline
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Long Island USA
Posts: 38,453
Krewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputationKrewat has a superb reputation
A stock Ecoboost in a SHO has a flat torque curve from around 1200-5500RPM. Because yours is tuned, the power is all up top.

Previous model EB, your mileage-may-vary caveat:



That's the F150 I'm assuming, and the previous EB, not the current one they are putting in the Raptor. I wouldn't say it makes all it's torque "up top"
 
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-05-2016, 11:00 PM
bykr
bykr is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 62
bykr is starting off with a positive reputation.
That torque curve is pretty amazing for the EcoBoost, but I'm also thinking that the Raptor EB torque comes in much higher.
 
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-06-2016, 05:26 AM
Slowpoke Slim's Avatar
Slowpoke Slim
Slowpoke Slim is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Bismarck, ND
Posts: 908
Slowpoke Slim has a very good reputation on FTE.Slowpoke Slim has a very good reputation on FTE.Slowpoke Slim has a very good reputation on FTE.Slowpoke Slim has a very good reputation on FTE.
Well,

I've shown that magazine article to my truck, and we had a long talk about it. My truck seems to agree with me that it thinks it can still pull my 5th wheel around.

*Ok, sarcasm mode disengaged. *

The Raptor is a toy for the Ricky Racer types to run around like idiots in. The Super Duty is a truck, for grown ups to do truck type work stuff with.
 
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-06-2016, 06:05 AM
john hardy
john hardy is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 99
john hardy is starting off with a positive reputation.
They should have gave the 6.2 a longer stroke for more torque.
 
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-06-2016, 07:39 AM
Chuck's First Ford
Chuck's First Ford is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Upper Right oHIo
Posts: 3,600
Chuck's First Ford has a very good reputation on FTE.Chuck's First Ford has a very good reputation on FTE.Chuck's First Ford has a very good reputation on FTE.
bring back Steam power.. max torque at 1 rpm.
a 4884 can spin all of its driver wheels pulling millions of pounds


Never Mind. way to much daily work.......
 
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-06-2016, 10:14 AM
Ron94150's Avatar
Ron94150
Ron94150 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Maryville, TN
Posts: 2,787
Ron94150 is a name known to allRon94150 is a name known to allRon94150 is a name known to allRon94150 is a name known to allRon94150 is a name known to allRon94150 is a name known to all
Originally Posted by john hardy
They should have gave the 6.2 a longer stroke for more torque and made the internals stonger. Instead they make a high reving motor only good for 450 HP. Dumb move on fords part!
Hey John, you bought that 6.7 yet? You are really in the minority hating your 6.2, I've been stuck in vehicles I really didn't like after buying them for one reason or the other, and it sucks. Just go buy it, I've found it's easier to ask the wife for forgiveness than permission.

With the stroke, it sounds like you want a 5.4 towing experience, which sucked on the interstate. No manufacture has built a gas motor that will tow 12k pounds and be able to hit the hills without revving and hold a hi way speed.

The 450hp max came from a livernois ad trying to sale a racing short block. I don't buy it for a minute. But the fact is, what are you going to do with your motor to get more than 450 hp out of it other than a supercharger? It would be cheaper to buy the diesel option, and if you have to coin to buy the supercharger, you should have the coin to maintain the diesel.
 
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-06-2016, 10:23 AM
RainDesert's Avatar
RainDesert
RainDesert is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,353
RainDesert has a good reputation on FTE.RainDesert has a good reputation on FTE.RainDesert has a good reputation on FTE.
For those who don't follow the 2017 SD and the updated 6.2, it is now producing 430 lbft at 3800 rpms. The first gen 6.2 that most have is at 405 lbft at 4500. So Ford has improved the 6.2 for torque.
 
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-06-2016, 10:51 AM
john hardy
john hardy is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 99
john hardy is starting off with a positive reputation.
The 6.2 does have a long stroke, the 5.4 is longer. The stroke of the 5.4 is 4.17 inches the 6.2 is 3.74 inches.
 
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 6.2 less powerful than ecoboost


Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
 
  • Ask a Question
    Get answers from community experts
Question Title:
Description:
Your question will be posted in: