Notices
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Fat Fendered and Classic Ford Trucks

Wheel offsets

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 27, 2016 | 03:02 PM
  #1  
dcavan001's Avatar
dcavan001
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 401
Likes: 1
From: North Vancouver, BC
Wheel offsets

Second thread today - we're toward the end of the rebuild and stuff doesn't get any easier, I'm finding.

1949 Mercury M68 truck, with Ford Explorer rear-end and matching front-end wheels/hubs. New drum brakes on back, upgraded to disc brakes on front. Since it is Explorer-based, that's 5-bolt wheels. The Explorer standards are PCD of 5X114.3; we're working on going with 17X7 wheels with a 265/70 R17 tire.

For the first time I'm dealing with wheel offsets, and trying to understand the impact of that. The standard Explorer offsets are listed as 35-38, but in a conversation with a wheel vendor yesterday he said that on old trucks you are often looking for a neutral or even negative offset. So, I'm trying to understand the impact of going with a standard Explorer wheel, how that will sit on the hub and in the fender, and whether I need to think differently about this. Am I making a mistake with going with the positive offset, and if so what might happen?
 
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2016 | 08:46 PM
  #2  
ranger pat's Avatar
ranger pat
Cargo Master
Veteran: Navy
25 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,759
Likes: 71
From: Elk River, MN
Explorer wheels are called 5x4.5 here is the US of A. Explorer wheels of the vintage with drum rear brakes (pre '95 I think) had 1/2" or 13 mm of offset. Probably 7" wide. That equates to what some folks call 4" of backspacing, meaning the center of the wheel is offset 1/2' towards the outside of the fender. The tire you named above is 10.71" wide 31.65" tall when measured on an 8" wheel. When the wheel vendor mentioned negative offset, it is usually needed to space the inside of the tire away from the edge of the box inside the fender as well as the frame rail. Measure from the wheel mounting surface on the drum to the inside towards the box and frame. That will give you an idea of how much offset is needed. Keep in mind that the tire will travel upward a few inches during jounce. How much clearance you want between the box side/frame and the sidewall of the tire is up to you, but an inch would be nice.
 
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2016 | 09:07 PM
  #3  
das54's Avatar
das54
Elder User
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 859
Likes: 3
From: Newberg, OR
The Ford Explorer rear end is 59 inches face of hub to face of hub. Stock fender wells are 11 inches from the side of the bed to the inside of the fender. Ideally the rear end should be 60 inches face of a hub to face of hub for a wheel with zero offset to be centered in the wheel well. The Ford Explorer rear end requires either a half inch spacer with zero offset wheels or wheels with a negative 13 mm offset in order to place the wheel in the center of the fender.
 
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2016 | 09:37 PM
  #4  
fbb1951's Avatar
fbb1951
Senior User
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 285
Likes: 1
From: Loa, Utah
I bought a set of used Explorer wheels and tires to use on my frame to make it a roller. When I tried to set the '51 F1 Panel body on the frame, the tires hit the wheel well on the inside face. No go. I ended up buying some 7" Smoothies from Wheel Vintiques. 4" backspace.
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2016 | 02:27 AM
  #5  
dcavan001's Avatar
dcavan001
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 401
Likes: 1
From: North Vancouver, BC
Thanks for the help on the wheel offset

I appreciate the experience shown here, as usual. I'll measure, do the math and decide where to head next.
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2016 | 03:11 AM
  #6  
Justin Hollomon's Avatar
Justin Hollomon
New User
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
I need some information

Can any one identify these rims for me and speaking on the topic of rims can I fit 20x10's on a 97 f150 2wd.


Does any one know the brand of these wheels so I can find the information on them
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2016 | 04:46 PM
  #7  
dcavan001's Avatar
dcavan001
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 401
Likes: 1
From: North Vancouver, BC
Rims ID and 97 tire fit

Justin - I don't know those rims, we'll see if anyone else pipes up.

The question about the fit for a '97 truck might best be asked in the 1997-2003 forum - there may be more people there who would be able to help with that.
 
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2016 | 12:36 PM
  #8  
petemcl's Avatar
petemcl
Logistics Pro
10 Year Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Community Favorite
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,685
Likes: 81
From: Northville, MI
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by dcavan001
Second thread today - we're toward the end of the rebuild and stuff doesn't get any easier, I'm finding.

1949 Mercury M68 truck, with Ford Explorer rear-end and matching front-end wheels/hubs. New drum brakes on back, upgraded to disc brakes on front. Since it is Explorer-based, that's 5-bolt wheels. The Explorer standards are PCD of 5X114.3; we're working on going with 17X7 wheels with a 265/70 R17 tire.

For the first time I'm dealing with wheel offsets, and trying to understand the impact of that. The standard Explorer offsets are listed as 35-38, but in a conversation with a wheel vendor yesterday he said that on old trucks you are often looking for a neutral or even negative offset. So, I'm trying to understand the impact of going with a standard Explorer wheel, how that will sit on the hub and in the fender, and whether I need to think differently about this. Am I making a mistake with going with the positive offset, and if so what might happen?
I have a 2001 8.8" Explorer Sportrac rear axle and I'm running 235R60x15 on 6" wide wheels on the front and 255R60x15 on 8" wide wheels in the rear.

The springs are Posie's Dual Flex in the front and Super Slide in the rear which yields about a 2 ½" drop in the front and 1 ½" in the rear.

The wheels are '34 Ford Artillery-style from Wheelsmith.




Note the +5" offset:



Here is the offset info that I sent to Wheelsmith so that they could make the wheels (ignore the line "Current Tire size"):

Front Wheels
 
Attached Images   
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

 Brett Foote
story-2

10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-3

Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

 Brett Foote
story-4

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-9

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
Old Oct 30, 2016 | 01:40 PM
  #9  
dcavan001's Avatar
dcavan001
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 401
Likes: 1
From: North Vancouver, BC
Thanks petemcl. Good detail there. I'm assuming that you still have lots of height available inside the fenders even with the drop? We have dropped the front and rear about the same amounts, so wondering about that.
 
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2016 | 03:27 PM
  #10  
petemcl's Avatar
petemcl
Logistics Pro
10 Year Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Community Favorite
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,685
Likes: 81
From: Northville, MI
Club FTE Gold Member
Lots of room in the rear. I haven't put the front fenders on yet but I do not expect much difference over what I had previously.



 
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2016 | 05:20 PM
  #11  
dcavan001's Avatar
dcavan001
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 401
Likes: 1
From: North Vancouver, BC
Height vs. width for wheels fit

Lots of room in the rear. I haven't put the front fenders on yet but I do not expect much difference over what I had previously.

Thanks - I'd like to focus on the fit side-to-side without worrying about fit at the top of the fenders. Good to know.
 
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2016 | 06:16 PM
  #12  
kens65fb's Avatar
kens65fb
Junior User
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: Northeast PA
Originally Posted by petemcl
Lots of room in the rear. I haven't put the front fenders on yet but I do not expect much difference over what I had previously.



Looks like your rear wheels are too far forward
 
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2016 | 02:21 PM
  #13  
petemcl's Avatar
petemcl
Logistics Pro
10 Year Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Community Favorite
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,685
Likes: 81
From: Northville, MI
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by dcavan001
Thanks - I'd like to focus on the fit side-to-side without worrying about fit at the top of the fenders. Good to know.
Here are a couple pictures from the rear if that helps you.



 
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2016 | 02:36 PM
  #14  
petemcl's Avatar
petemcl
Logistics Pro
10 Year Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Community Favorite
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,685
Likes: 81
From: Northville, MI
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by kens65fb
Looks like your rear wheels are too far forward
Yes they are Ken. Per my previous posts my truck has led a hard life. It is an F2 but one of the PO's shortened the frame by 10" which makes it 112" not 114" like an F1. Then it looked like it had some sort of utility box welded to it. Then another PO removed that box and added a well used and abused 1951 or 52 F1 6 ½' box and as you noticed the wheels were not quite centered.

So to fix that, thanks to a suggestion from Ross (ALBUQUE F-1), rather than cutting & re-welding the frame again I just moved the fenders forward a few inches. This is how it looks now:

 
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2016 | 02:46 PM
  #15  
dcavan001's Avatar
dcavan001
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 401
Likes: 1
From: North Vancouver, BC
Thanks for the additional pics, and good call on moving the box instead of cutting the frame.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:05 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

Slideshow: Top 10 Fords at 2026 Ford Nationals

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-09 11:10:08


VIEW MORE
story-1
3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

Based on years of owning multiple modern Ford products.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-09 10:53:36


VIEW MORE
story-2
10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

SPONSORED: From muddy boots to rain-soaked cargo, these upgrades address some of the most common frustrations Ford truck owners face every day.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-06-08 18:50:34


VIEW MORE
story-3
Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

Here's everything you need to know about every Ford engine available for the 2026 model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-05 12:58:01


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-5
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-6
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-9
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE