Notices
1994.5 - 1997 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel  

Fuel Additive Test Using the OBS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 30, 2016 | 09:11 AM
  #1  
BBslider001's Avatar
BBslider001
Thread Starter
|
Hotshot
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 10,590
Likes: 382
From: Texas
Fuel Additive Test Using the OBS

Truck Trend did a comprehensive fuel additive test for diesel. The cool thing is, they used an OBS with mods that most of us use here. Just thought I would share. It's a real world test using 2-Stroke oil, Opti-Libe XPD, and FPPF +8.

Fuel Additive Test - Ultra-Low Sulfur Diesel - Diesel Power Magazine

 
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2016 | 10:10 AM
  #2  
knottyrope's Avatar
knottyrope
Lead Driver
5 Year Member
Shutterbug
Community Builder
Loved
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 7,065
Likes: 1,296
From: Bahstun
Originally Posted by BBslider001
Truck Trend did a comprehensive fuel additive test for diesel. The cool thing is, they used an OBS with mods that most of us use here. Just thought I would share. It's a real world test using 2-Stroke oil, Opti-Libe XPD, and FPPF +8.

Fuel Additive Test - Ultra-Low Sulfur Diesel - Diesel Power Magazine

That's nice to know. thanks.


Ill stick with 2 stroke oil, much cheaper and I don't plan to use my F350 in winter
 
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2016 | 11:35 AM
  #3  
Bob_T's Avatar
Bob_T
Laughing Gas
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 774
Likes: 25
From: Reno, Nevada
Very interesting and thanks for posting the link. I always suspect magazine tests since they might not want to offend potential advertisers. However... they included a no-name 2 stroke oil and rated it right up there with the best additives. I think I'll be switching to 2 stroke oil.

Also interesting that the oil company claim that they add enough additive at the refinery seems to be BS.
 
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2016 | 12:40 PM
  #4  
Jarrett Campbell's Avatar
Jarrett Campbell
Cargo Master
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 21
From: Aransas Pass, Tx
I worked at a fuel transportation company in college. All the additives for branded fuel (eg exxon, texaco, BP, etc) were mixed with the fuels while they were being added to the truck, so that at least is accurate. It's kind of interesting how the pipelines are shared between oil and trucking companies.
 
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2016 | 01:04 PM
  #5  
powrstrkr's Avatar
powrstrkr
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,313
Likes: 6
From: Rio Rancho NM
I've been using ST 2cy oil for years at 1oz:gal. Looks like I can drop the amount I add to 200:1 and still be effective. I've never tried the other 2 additives. Knock on wood, I've got 118K with original fuel system parts and never had a fuel leak anywhere.
 
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2016 | 01:14 PM
  #6  
lee00's Avatar
lee00
Fleet Mechanic
15 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,950
Likes: 1
From: Knoxville, TN
While I think that study has some merit and is a good baseline to start, but I have some issues with it:


They don't divulge the same data for each set that they illustrate in the article:
ex #1 - no additive is missing the best highway and best city mpg totals
Ex #2 - the three additive don't have an overall mpg total.


there is data and information missing needed to draw conclusions:
ex #1. - They said the testing period was 11,000 miles (doubtful it was an even
number) but how many miles on each additive?
Ex# 2 - three stations were used - were there equal fill up from each of the three stations and Were tests run on the base fuel before the additives were mixed to determine a baseline fuel standard?
ex #3 - How did they eliminate cross contamination between additives? Maybe a mixture of 2 stroke and opti lube gave you that 17.4 mpg?


Where are routes they took, weather conditions (ie wind direction and speed).




Lets not forget to mention it was written in November of 2009.
 
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2016 | 02:21 PM
  #7  
jacob_powerhouse's Avatar
jacob_powerhouse
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
From: Kendallville
I appreciate the information for what it is.
 
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2016 | 03:22 PM
  #8  
BBslider001's Avatar
BBslider001
Thread Starter
|
Hotshot
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 10,590
Likes: 382
From: Texas
Originally Posted by lee00
While I think that study has some merit and is a good baseline to start I have some issues with it:


They don't divulge the same data for each set that they illustrate in the article:
ex #1 - no additive is missing the best highway and best city mpg totals
Ex #2 - the three additive don't have an overall mpg total.


there is data and information missing needed to draw conclusions:
ex #1. - They said the testing period was 11,000 miles (doubtful it was an even
number) but how many miles on each additive?
Ex# 2 - three stations were used - were there equal fill up from each of the three stations and Were tests run on the base fuel before the additives were mixed to determine a baseline fuel standard?
ex #3 - How did they eliminate cross contamination between additives? Maybe a mixture of 2 stroke and opti lube gave you that 17.4 mpg?


Where are routes they took, weather conditions (ie wind direction and speed).




Lets not forget to mention it was written in November of 2009.
I dunno Lee. I think you might be reading too much into it. It provides good base information. I don't think it's the end-all-be-all for fuel additives, but rather gives a decent idea of what to expect when using.
 
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2016 | 03:37 PM
  #9  
lee00's Avatar
lee00
Fleet Mechanic
15 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,950
Likes: 1
From: Knoxville, TN
Originally Posted by BBslider001
I dunno Lee. I think you might be reading too much into it. It provides good base information. I don't think it's the end-all-be-all for fuel additives, but rather gives a decent idea of what to expect when using.


I agree its a start, all I was trying to say is it need to be more consistent and complete with the data they provide.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
wavehunter
6.4L Power Stroke Diesel
7
Jul 28, 2018 09:02 AM
balzdeep05'
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel
48
Jan 13, 2012 04:13 PM
BASSHUNTER
6.4L Power Stroke Diesel
7
Dec 6, 2011 03:22 PM
RoadJunkie
6.4L Power Stroke Diesel
3
Dec 20, 2010 07:05 PM
bismic
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel
1
May 18, 2008 08:46 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:01 AM.