Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks

bigger better T-Case.....?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 20, 2016 | 03:45 PM
  #1  
badasssapper67's Avatar
badasssapper67
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
bigger better T-Case.....?

Hey all,
I've got an 87, but it's carbureted so I normally hang in the bullnose forum. I've got a 460 with a dana 50 front end and a 1345 T-Case.


I live in a rain forest were the ground is pure clay. I have acerage and animals and at some point Im going to be clearing a section of my land and I want a t-case that isn't going to go "POP" at the worst possible time.


From my research, the two cases Im looking at are the BW 4407 and the NV 271. Ford replaced the 4407 with the 271 so that makes me think it's a better case.
Im going to be installing 5:13 or 5:38's in the truck and eventually an E40d or a 4R100 depending on which one is stronger, I haven't researched that yet, and that will put me right at 50 mph on road speed with acceptable rpm's. The only on road driving it will see are trips to the auction and possible trips to the lumber yard.


I do want this to be my "forever" truck. All reliable and tough running gear and expensive parts I consider "truck payments". So I'll be stroking out the 460 to get as much torque out of it as a 6.4 power stroke. (I hope). So I'm leaning towards the 271, but will it bolt to a E4od or a 4R100? That's my main question.
 
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2016 | 07:52 PM
  #2  
Lead Head's Avatar
Lead Head
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,868
Likes: 9
From: Rhode Island
Even a BW 1356 will do what you want. You'll never break a 4407. A few people claim the 271 is stronger, but they don't have the data to back it up.

You're also not going to get 650 ft-lbs @ 2000 RPM like a 6.4 powerstroke without forced induction.
 
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2016 | 08:29 PM
  #3  
Diesel_Brad's Avatar
Diesel_Brad
Fleet Owner
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 21,437
Likes: 76
From: Gilbert, PA
The big problem with the NV271 is
the COST$$$$$$$$

and then there is the problem that the splines are different

I agree with lead. 1356
 
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2016 | 02:07 PM
  #4  
badasssapper67's Avatar
badasssapper67
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Im shooting for 650 ft-lbs at 3500.....ish. I figure a 514 stroker kit with hydrolic roller cam spec'd for torque would do the job.
The rpm's are what's worrying me, I can get there with 5.13 gears but will the rest of the drive train live long with 650ft-lbs at 3500-4000 rpm? That's why Im thinking I want a really stout T case.
 
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2016 | 06:18 PM
  #5  
rla2005's Avatar
rla2005
Fleet Owner
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Community Favorite
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 20,786
Likes: 1,751
From: Kentucky
That Dana 50 front is going to be the short fuse in this equation IMHO.
 
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2016 | 08:23 PM
  #6  
GuitarJesus's Avatar
GuitarJesus
Posting Guru
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 3
From: Menifee, CA
My 97' F350 I just bought has a 4407. Good god its beefy as hell. I doubt you'd ever bust one
 
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2016 | 09:47 PM
  #7  
Lead Head's Avatar
Lead Head
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,868
Likes: 9
From: Rhode Island
Originally Posted by badasssapper67
Im shooting for 650 ft-lbs at 3500.....ish. I figure a 514 stroker kit with hydrolic roller cam spec'd for torque would do the job.
The rpm's are what's worrying me, I can get there with 5.13 gears but will the rest of the drive train live long with 650ft-lbs at 3500-4000 rpm? That's why Im thinking I want a really stout T case.
Nah, You'd still be hard-pressed to do that. Even a built GM8.1 (496) isn't making 650 ft-lbs @ 3500 RPM.
 
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2016 | 11:49 PM
  #8  
arse_sidewards's Avatar
arse_sidewards
Laughing Gas
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 903
Likes: 119
Originally Posted by Lead Head
Even a BW 1356 will do what you want. You'll never break a 4407. A few people claim the 271 is stronger, but they don't have the data to back it up.

You're also not going to get 650 ft-lbs @ 2000 RPM like a 6.4 powerstroke without forced induction.
x2. He'll kill plenty of axle parts with 5.xx gears before he does anything bad to a t-case.

That said, 271 off a 4R100 has the correct 31-spline input... If you can find one for cheap.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-2

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-4

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-5

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-8

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Apr 22, 2016 | 08:29 AM
  #9  
'89F2urd's Avatar
'89F2urd
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 5,775
Likes: 443
a ~550 cube stroker, high compression, high lift/low duration cam (low duration relative to cubes, it will NOT look like a small block cam's duration), high flowing "small port" (Dare I use that term on a 460?) heads will net the power you are after, in the power band you'd like it to be in, no problem. If you mismatch one item, however, you'll end up with a powerhouse with upper end hp or something that is far from optimal overall.

I've always liked the bw 13fiddy6...although I've shattered a couple, broken tailhousings of a half dozen before I switched to fixed output, but I always have an extra laying around because they are so abundant at the jy.

the 4407 is a bear, and is a shame they aren't more abundant.....excellent case.
 
Reply
Old May 12, 2016 | 03:16 PM
  #10  
badasssapper67's Avatar
badasssapper67
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
'89, The heads are where I have questions. I don't cant CJ ports obviously but I don't want the exhaust to be restrictive either. Im thinking of getting some of those import aluminum heads I see the pro head porters using on you tube. That way I can put in a CJ exhaust valve and match the ports to the gaskets and put them on a flow bench and see if they'll handle 550+ci. while keeping a stream of fast flowing air with a hydrolic roller cam.
Am I in the right ball park?
Oh and I cant run high compression there isn't a gas station close that has that kind of fuel, but I can run 10:1 comp
 
Reply
Old May 12, 2016 | 06:25 PM
  #11  
badasssapper67's Avatar
badasssapper67
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
That said, 271 off a 4R100 has the correct 31-spline input... If you can find one for cheap.


Thanks, I'll keep that in mind.
 
Reply
Old May 12, 2016 | 08:03 PM
  #12  
Diesel_Brad's Avatar
Diesel_Brad
Fleet Owner
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 21,437
Likes: 76
From: Gilbert, PA
Note the word IF
 
Reply
Old May 13, 2016 | 07:55 AM
  #13  
'89F2urd's Avatar
'89F2urd
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 5,775
Likes: 443
Ehhhh there's a lot to look at when selecting your heads...I'd start by selecting a cam to define some variables such as max lift and duration. I'm going to try to do this without writing a book about it....

What you wanna do when selecting cylinder heads is look specifically at the flow data at low - mid lift. Larger ports don't mean more flow once a cam and valves are thrown into the mix, so you can't just buy a set of heads based solely off intake and ex runner size. .600 is about the max lift you can run with a standard hydraulic lifter setup so let's just start there. You don't want heads that continue to increase flow above that lift, it'd be a waste of low lift flow because generally there is a tradeoff. You want great flow from low - mid lift that doesn't drop off or plateau until .600 or more realistically, .5-.55" lift. This is the only way to achieve your maximum low rpm power goal. You absolutely do not want heads that continue to increase flow through .650 and beyond, when doing your homework you'll notice that smaller port heads outflow the big port designed for high lift and rpm.

With 550 cubes, you can't look at cams or heads as if you were building a 460. The rpm range of each 460 cam and head combo would drop considerably if used on a 550
To match the increase in cubes you'll need to bump up duration, and it will cause no I'll effects in idle if you are selecting properly for low rpm hp. A custom cam is probably a must.

the compression is definitely going to put a damper on your goal, but 10:1 will still be a monster.
 
Reply
Old May 13, 2016 | 10:19 AM
  #14  
82F100SWB's Avatar
82F100SWB
Post Fiend
25 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 5,330
Likes: 17
From: Dryden, ON, Canada
I highly suggest not going with an off the shelf cam, indtead get a custom grind from someone who knows these engines well, there are lots of good off the shelf grinds for a 460, but add a hundred cubes and the ballgame changes completely.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ozzie_f-trucker
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
15
Jul 8, 2011 05:29 PM
johnboggs21
Pre-Power Stroke Diesel (7.3L IDI & 6.9L)
44
Mar 14, 2011 09:28 PM
mando jake
Clutch, Transmission, Differential, Axle & Transfer Case
4
May 5, 2007 11:32 PM
68shortbed
1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
4
Jul 2, 2006 02:47 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:26 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-1
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-3
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-4
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-5
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-7
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE