When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
These are still unicorn farts...we keep hearing about them, but no one has one.
Oh they do exist. I would link a vender who sells them and is currently running a couple on his trucks, but he is not a sponsor for this forum. Unicorn farts, on the other hand, do not exist.
I helped a member of my family replace and install a KC38r as a replacement for a 38r three weekends ago. The KC38r comes with the upgraded billet wheel that will cost you $200 additional at most places. It also comes with a billet Bighead WGC. The compressor and exhaust wheels are larger than the 38r. As mentioned, it is rebuildable although I am not certain how valuable this feature is over the long haul. I guess it depends upon where it may fail in comparison to where the 38r fails.
He chose the .84AR exhaust side on the KC38r as opposed to the 1.0 on the 38r for a faster spool. He is running 160/?...it is a secret, 4" back, 6637 and Gearhead tuning.
He says there is a noticeable difference between the two turbos with the KC38r winning by lowering EGT's by about 120-150*F.
I have ridden in the truck while towing. Out of the hole empty there is a slight difference favoring the KC38r; however, when towing 10k, the KC38r is superior. It spools quicker and EGT's are definitely lower. I would assume that this is due to it flowing more air since nothing else has changed on his truck. MAP and EBP are almost 1:1.
I helped a member of my family replace and install a KC38r as a replacement for a 38r three weekends ago. The KC38r comes with the upgraded billet wheel that will cost you $200 additional at most places. It also comes with a billet Bighead WGC. The compressor and exhaust wheels are larger than the 38r. As mentioned, it is rebuildable although I am not certain how valuable this feature is over the long haul. I guess it depends upon where it may fail in comparison to where the 38r fails.
He chose the .84AR exhaust side on the KC38r as opposed to the 1.0 on the 38r for a faster spool. He is running 160/?...it is a secret, 4" back, 6637 and Gearhead tuning.
He says there is a noticeable difference between the two turbos with the KC38r winning by lowering EGT's by about 120-150*F.
I have ridden in the truck while towing. Out of the hole there is a slight difference favoring the KC38r; however, when towing 10k, the KC38r is superior. It spools quicker and EGT's are definitely lower. I would assume that this is due to it flowing more air since nothing else has changed on his truck. MAP and EBP are almost 1:1.
Is it just me or does it scream of made in China? It isn't like he is casting these in his back yard, so it makes you wonder where they are coming from. No OE manufacturers have these parts. Would be interesting to know. The other issue I am wondering about is the back pressure being 1:1 and a .84 A/R housing don't add up. Back pressure increases with a small housing which is why we use the 1.0 a lot.
These are still unicorn farts...we keep hearing about them, but no one has one.
Hopefully the KC38R isn't like their 6.0L turbos. They were all the rage until people actually started running them. Then it was thread after thread of them blowing up and coming apart.
Is it just me or does it scream of made in China? It isn't like he is casting these in his back yard, so it makes you wonder where they are coming from. No OE manufacturers have these parts. Would be interesting to know. The other issue I am wondering about is the back pressure being 1:1 and a .84 A/R housing don't add up. Back pressure increases with a small housing which is why we use the 1.0 a lot.
Well, my cousin did a lot of research. He spends his time on the other 7.3 forums where the KC38r's are more popular. I could posit your questions to him if you are interested??? As to the .84 A/R producing near 1:1, I do understand the logic and science behind your statement; however, in my above post I used "almost" in the description. Having clarified that, do you think it, the "almost 1:1" could be attributed to the size difference, larger, in the turbine and compressor wheels when compared directly to the 38r. To me it is not an exact apples to apples comparison. If the two were identical internally, with the only difference being .84 vs 1.0 A/R, I would agree completely with your assessment. If you do think it is a direct comparison, I am curious as to why?
Originally Posted by duck fan
Hopefully the KC38R isn't like their 6.0L turbos. They were all the rage until people actually started running them. Then it was thread after thread of them blowing up and coming apart.
Yes, he read about some issues with the the 6.0 turbo and they are comparable to the OEM issues he had with the 6.0 in some respects. However, the technology/engineering/complexity involved in the non VV or non VGT 38R and KC38R is much less so there is significantly less chance of failure...or are we missing something?
He has about 4k miles on it now and others had about 30k miles on theirs when he made the decision. Time will tell.
He has grenaded more than one 6.0L, so that is why he is back with the 7.3L.
I think the point here was money with the original posted. He would be money a head with the 38R and intake and be very happy. I'm with duck fan on this, don't know enough on the KC. My 2cents. Good post jhl3, have to keep track.
Nick, one key point in your situation is that you stated that you are moving to Ca. I seriously doubt that anything other than a stock turbo will pass smog here unless it is visually the same.
So it looks the same visually? Good to know.I know that some smog techs are more user friendly than others. I had one that balked at my AFE Bladerunner intake manifold even though I had the CARB stickers to go with it. Another shop had no problem.
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level
Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.