Notices
1997 - 2006 Expedition & Navigator 1997 - 2002 and 2003 - 2006 Ford Expedition and Lincoln Navigator Discussion

03 Expedition P0171 Help

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 10, 2016 | 12:44 AM
  #1  
CycleVIN's Avatar
CycleVIN
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
03 Expedition P0171 Help

I just picked up a 2003 Expedition XLT RWD with a 4.6L SOHC and 163k miles. It is throwing code P0171 Too Lean on Bank 1. The IAC Valve had an internal short to the case, I found a Collapsed PCV Hose and a broken vacuum line and fixed all of those but still have the lean condition and the code keeps coming back. The only noticeable symptom is a little shaking at idle, under load everything seems fine. It has new Upstream O2 Sensors and Catalytic Converters, but the Downstream O2 Sensors look like the original ones so I am going to swap them tomorrow clear the code and see if P0174 comes up instead. Here is my freeze frame data, any help would be greatly appreciated:

FUELSYS1 CL
FUELSYS2 --
LOAD_PCT(%) 21.6
ECT(*C) 74
SHRTTFT1(%) 5.5
LONGFT1(%) 26.6
SHRTFT2(%) 3.9
LONGFT2(%) -15.6
RPM(rpm) 803
VSS(km/h) 31
SPARKADV(*) 15.0
IAT(*C) 9
MAF(g/s) 6.58
TP(%) 19.6
O2B1S1(V) 0.745
SHRTFTB1S1(%) 5.5
O2B1S2(V) 0.330
SHRTFTB1S2(%) N/A
O2B2S1(V) 0.660
SHRTFTB2S1(%) 3.9
O2B2S2(V) 0.270
SHRTFTB2S2(%) 99.2
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2016 | 03:44 AM
  #2  
alloro's Avatar
alloro
Fleet Owner
15 Year Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 24,316
Likes: 5,127
From: 0,0,1
Club FTE Gold Member
Check to makes sure the fuel pressure is up to specs. If it is then you still have a vacuum leak. If you don't find any issues with the hoses it can be the intake manifold gasket.
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2016 | 05:20 AM
  #3  
Skauber's Avatar
Skauber
Posting Guru
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 3
Isn't this the one with the integrated coolant crossover tube on a plastic intake manifold? They're known to crack and leak where the coolant crossover is
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2016 | 10:16 AM
  #4  
alloro's Avatar
alloro
Fleet Owner
15 Year Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 24,316
Likes: 5,127
From: 0,0,1
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Skauber
They're known to crack and leak where the coolant crossover is
I don't get it, what does leaking coolant have to do with a possible vacuum leak?
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2016 | 10:36 AM
  #5  
Skauber's Avatar
Skauber
Posting Guru
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 3
On the 2v 4.6l (or was it the 5.4?) they have the plastic intake manifold with an integrated aluminum coolant crossover tube, which also shares the same gasket as the intake manifold. The plastic gets brittle and cracks near the coolant crossover, voila, vacuum leak, or worse, coolant leak into the intake ports.
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2016 | 12:22 PM
  #6  
CycleVIN's Avatar
CycleVIN
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by alloro
Check to makes sure the fuel pressure is up to specs. If it is then you still have a vacuum leak. If you don't find any issues with the hoses it can be the intake manifold gasket.
I am going to test fuel pressure and see, I just ordered a new fuel filter and fuel pressure tester and am just waiting for them in the mail. Do you know what the correct spec is at idle and under load for fuel pressure? I heard it was 55-65 psi. I was also thinking it might be a fuel injector o-ring, so I am going to replace those on Bank 1 and see since it only costs like $4 for all 8 of them.

A few years ago I replaced an Intake Manifold on my 2001.5 Mustang GT with a 4.6L SOHC, it had the plastic/aluminum crossover and started leaking coolant but never threw a code. I put a Dorman one on and it worked fine, came with the Gaskets and everything. Does anyone know if its the same procedure for the Triton 4.6? Thanks for the input.
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2016 | 01:36 PM
  #7  
alloro's Avatar
alloro
Fleet Owner
15 Year Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 24,316
Likes: 5,127
From: 0,0,1
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by CycleVIN
Do you know what the correct spec is at idle and under load for fuel pressure? I heard it was 55-65 psi.

Does anyone know if its the same procedure for the Triton 4.6? Thanks for the input.
Fuel specs and intake R&R procedures are attached.
 
Attached Images
File Type: pdf
2003 Fuel Specs.pdf (99.4 KB, 232 views)
File Type: pdf
2003 4-6 Intake R&R.pdf (581.8 KB, 87 views)
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2016 | 11:54 PM
  #8  
CycleVIN's Avatar
CycleVIN
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by alloro
Fuel specs and intake R&R procedures are attached.
Turned out to be the fuel filter, thanks for the specs.
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2016 | 04:48 PM
  #9  
CycleVIN's Avatar
CycleVIN
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
About 5 days after I did the fuel filter, the light came back on. I ended up replacing the intake manifold gasket, it was blown out at the back of Cylinder 4. While I was in there I noticed the gasket that goes in between the aluminum upper intake manifold, and the plastic lower intake plenum was also leaking so I replaced it as well. While I had the intake manifold out I checked the plugs and they were all Motorcraft and looked pretty new. The gap was good on them so I just re-installed them. I swapped out the O-Rings on the injectors, and found one injector with a broken tip. I swapped that injector out to the other bank a few days ago have not had a code come back yet. Hopefully if the CEL does come back it will be on Bank 2 and then I will know it is the Injector.


 
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2016 | 10:07 AM
  #10  
alloro's Avatar
alloro
Fleet Owner
15 Year Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 24,316
Likes: 5,127
From: 0,0,1
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by CycleVIN
I checked the plugs and they were all Motorcraft and looked pretty new. The gap was good on them so I just re-installed them.
While I understand the concept of don't replace what isn't broke...considering how difficult they are to replace I think I would have done so and then taken comfort in knowing they were good for another 100K miles. But that's me. $$
 
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2016 | 02:08 PM
  #11  
CycleVIN's Avatar
CycleVIN
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by alloro
While I understand the concept of don't replace what isn't broke...considering how difficult they are to replace I think I would have done so and then taken comfort in knowing they were good for another 100K miles. But that's me. $$
I have 8 brand new motorcraft plugs for the truck just sitting here in the box, but the plugs that were already in there literally looked brand spanking new otherwise trust me I would have replaced them. I think the last person that had the truck had an extended warranty or something because it looks like someone has just recently thrown a lot of parts at it trying to fix this code. Still no code yet and its been almost 200 miles so it looks like it might actually be fixed finally, fingers crossed, lol...when I did the fuel filter it took about 250 miles for the CEL to come back on though so we will see.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Chips2000
1997 - 2006 Expedition & Navigator
5
Nov 8, 2018 07:44 PM
Diver down
1997 - 2006 Expedition & Navigator
6
Jan 3, 2016 02:13 PM
camcam
1997 - 2006 Expedition & Navigator
4
Sep 28, 2013 06:41 PM
popeye47
1997 - 2006 Expedition & Navigator
3
Jul 3, 2012 09:32 AM
giles45shop
Escape & Escape Hybrid
2
Sep 25, 2010 06:58 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:21 AM.