When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Serious question here and maybe someone that's an extreme truck user has an answer, but Ford is touting a frame that is 24x stronger (or something to that effect) of the previous version. What real world benefit is that when, apparently, the old frame was strong enough to tow/haul loads far in excess of the truck's rating? This frame has been around for 18 model years and I've never heard of a failure. Is this just hype that doesn't really matter?
That tail gate buckling commercial did a lot of damage to Fords credibility with non Ford owners. That can't happen.
The old frame, and it's flex was fine with me.
Most people who compare the Super Duty to the Silverado HD will admit the ride and handling are much better in the Chevy. Lots of reasons for that, but not having as much frame shimmy makes quite a difference.
I think it's about time that we've caught up to the competition in this area. Shame it took so long!
Most people who compare the Super Duty to the Silverado HD will admit the ride and handling are much better in the Chevy. Lots of reasons for that, but not having as much frame shimmy makes quite a difference.
I think it's about time that we've caught up to the competition in this area. Shame it took so long!
You might have something there.
I just bought a 2015 GMC Sierra 2500 to plow with, and the ride is far, far superior to my last 2500hd.
The suspension components look the same, but the ride is incredible for a truck with a front gvwr of 6200 lbs.
The tailgate damage video was a jig built by GM to force the Ford to buckle under a certain angle of approach. I highly doubt that any really buckled in the wild.
IMHO, Ford did more to harm their own rep with questionable engines over the term of the superduty lifespan.
Lots of PO'd F-150 guys for the same reasons, engines.
You might have something there.
I just bought a 2015 GMC Sierra 2500 to plow with, and the ride is far, far superior to my last 2500hd.
The suspension components look the same, but the ride is incredible for a truck with a front gvwr of 6200 lbs.
I work for a big fleet, and we have large numbers of late model Silverado 2500HD's and Super Duty F-250's. Our drivers all say the Chevy's ride and handle better than the Fords, and feel more stable when loaded. I think it is due to the stiffness of the GM boxed frame. That having been said, we have never had any frame issues with the Fords that I know of.
To be fair, I've never heard of anyone bending or breaking the frame of their Super Duty. I think it's a ride, handling, and NVH thing more than anything capability related.
Road tractors use open C-channel frames. And they twist, shimmy, and shake far more than any light duty truck I've ever seen. Sure they're strong enough to haul lots of weight, but they certainly don't do it gracefully.
I had to park my truck in a severe twist ditch a couple of days this last week. The cab and bed twisted about 1/4 of an inch and the tailgate opened fine. In my 30 years of working construction I never heard of a ford owner say "Help I'm in a twist ditch and can't open my tailgate"
I would be worried if I had a fully boxed frame about the frame rusting out. Especially here the northeast. With mostly a c-channel configured frame on my 2015 f350 I can wash salt and sand off the inside of the frame and coat it with fluid film.
Us in the rust belt wonder if they did the salt test on the frame. Salt gets in everywhere, unless sealed very well. We rate the salt by the leftover salt when spring comes. We have white roads until a large rain washes it off.
I would be worried if I had a fully boxed frame about the frame rusting out. Especially here the northeast. With mostly a c-channel configured frame on my 2015 f350 I can wash salt and sand off the inside of the frame and coat it with fluid film.
That's such a tired old argument, I think it's ready to die. The front frame of your Super Duty is boxed, and they have been that way at least since '99 and I believe a lot older. I'd be willing to bet your front frame isn't rusted out. I remember back around the end of '03 people were decrying the fully boxed frame in the new generation F150. In the 12 years since the introduction of the '04 F150 I have yet to see or hear of one rusting out.
My 1997 Lincoln Town Car has a fully boxed frame, and it's in fine shape. Bought it in Ware, MA, and the CARFAX shows it's lived in MA and NY its entire life until I moved it to Minnesota. It has 176,000 miles at the moment, and frame rust is about the least likely thing to put it in the grave.
I haven't been underneath a vehicle that didn't have a fully boxed frame up front, and with rare exception frames don't seem to rust out. I've been wrong before, and I'm sure I'll be wrong again. Can you or someone else point me to the myriad rusted out front frames in Super Duties?