Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

No AC!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 05-16-2015, 03:50 AM
Krisverde's Avatar
Krisverde
Krisverde is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 524
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rla2005
Yes you could do that but it is a hack without long term results or side effects from using. Perhaps I am overly cautious.
There are many people who have ran r152a/computer duster for long term. I have been running it in my 91 for about a year and a half now with no problems.
 
  #17  
Old 05-16-2015, 08:18 AM
tjc transport's Avatar
tjc transport
tjc transport is offline
i ain't rite
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Marlboro Mental Hospital.
Posts: 60,942
Received 3,090 Likes on 2,154 Posts
Originally Posted by krooser
It's a similar refrigerant… what's the problem? I'm no expert although I was ASE certified in A/C years ago. We have a local shop here that has done dozens of old cars with this stuff… no downside that I know of. Cheap and easy.
similar is not the same as the same thing. these systems were designed for R-12. doing a 134-A conversion will not work as good unless you convert the whole system to work with 134-A. and that will cost big bucks. new compressor, new receiver drier, new condenser, new evaporator, new lines, new orifice tube.
even the freeze 12 "drop in" refrigerants use some 134-A.
i have also seen people use butane and propane based refrigerants, even though they are illegal.
 
  #18  
Old 05-16-2015, 09:33 AM
rla2005's Avatar
rla2005
rla2005 is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 19,572
Received 1,156 Likes on 914 Posts
We can sit here and argue all day but in the long run everyone has their own view point. I am not a fan of hacked R12 to R134a conversions. I personally think even less of a conversion to R152a. As long as I can get R12 at a reasonable price I'll use it.

Thanks to those who offered up an alternative...YMMV
 
  #19  
Old 05-16-2015, 10:33 PM
jas88's Avatar
jas88
jas88 is offline
Lead Driver

Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Greater Austin, Texas
Posts: 7,295
Likes: 0
Received 351 Likes on 282 Posts
I tried butane in my Bronco and it did work, but it's not for the average Joe. You gotta know what you are doing to get the charge right.

You can thank the government who took DuPont's money for the situation we are in with refrigerant. It used to be you could buy R12 for 50 cents a can in the 70s. It's no different than Philips paying to get incandescent bulbs outlawed on the canard that they are bad for the environment - just the other day I was in Home Depot and 100W incandescent bulbs (they are legal if made in the US to certain restrictions) are now $3 a pop. Thanks, Uncle Sam, you *****!
 
  #20  
Old 06-02-2015, 10:04 AM
ASTROENG2011's Avatar
ASTROENG2011
ASTROENG2011 is offline
New User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RE-TRO-FIT TO R-134A

During the 90's I worked for a company as an engineer that was testing retrofits on Ford vehicles. The Ford F-150 is one of the easiest to retro fit to use R-134a. We did several trucks with differing engine sizes and all worked as well as the R-12 systems. You will have to change the accumulator, the orifice tube, and the oil in the system. Best way is to remove the compressor and drain all the oil from it you can and refill with a PAG( poly alkyl glycol) or PAB( poly alkyl benzene) based oil. Flush the condensor and evaporator with an approved flush media and reinstall compressor, new accumulator and orifice tube. When re- charging the refrigerant to use the newer R-134a the amount of charge will be approximately 80% by weight of the R-12 used. You will notice an increase is the discharge( high) side pressure of about 15 to 20 psig at idle. Low side pressures will remain fairly consistent with R-12 pressures ( 25-35 psig). You will only need to change hose connection seals with newer compatible materials if you opened them or they were leaking. Be careful with the oils. MINERAL OIL as used in the R-12 system is immiscible ( not mixable) with the newer PAG oils. When they do mix if any water is present,they form something akin to a fishing worm type gel that will require almost a total replacement of system.
 
  #21  
Old 06-02-2015, 10:57 AM
rla2005's Avatar
rla2005
rla2005 is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 19,572
Received 1,156 Likes on 914 Posts
Originally Posted by ASTROENG2011
Be careful with the oils. MINERAL OIL as used in the R-12 system is immiscible ( not mixable) with the newer PAG oils. When they do mix if any water is present,they form something akin to a fishing worm type gel that will require almost a total replacement of system.
That is exactly why I caution anyone contemplating doing this conversion, it has a serious pitfall. Some get lucky, others do not.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
The_Scatch
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
2
05-15-2019 05:53 PM
4x484150
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
14
05-23-2018 04:09 PM
VictorwithaC
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel
48
07-18-2017 05:47 PM
Garden Spyder
Kansas Chapter
6
07-01-2012 12:27 PM
texas F 250
Cooling, Heating, Ventilation & A/C
11
11-01-2010 07:38 AM



Quick Reply: No AC!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:17 PM.