When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Honestly, I'd put a C4 and a 9" or 8.8 with 3.25 gears behind it and call it a day. The $$ payback on having OD with gas around $2/gal is decades in the future. With the hills around you you're likely to be in OD on the downhill side only. Add in famous AOD problems, who needs it? You don't usually have to cut the crossmember to fit a C4, either.
Honestly, I'd put a C4 and a 9" or 8.8 with 3.25 gears behind it and call it a day. The $$ payback on having OD with gas around $2/gal is decades in the future. With the hills around you you're likely to be in OD on the downhill side only. Add in famous AOD problems, who needs it? You don't usually have to cut the crossmember to fit a C4, either.
You are right about the savings on gas . . . as long as prices stay down there. But I picked the 4R70W because the .70:1 overdrive gear gives you 30% better cruising speed and less engine noise. Reliability is better than the AOD.
First gear is lower on the C4 at 2.41 vs the 4R70W at 2.84:1 but the torque converter is most effective at compensating in low gear.
With the wide opening in the F2 crossmember vs F1 there should be less mod needed.
parasitic loss is certainly something to think about with the AOD/4R70. How much HP does a mildly built/refreshed Flathead put out? Between an AOD and 4R though the 4R is a better transmission in every way
parasitic loss is certainly something to think about with the AOD/4R70. How much HP does a mildly built/refreshed Flathead put out? Between an AOD and 4R though the 4R is a better transmission in every way
Well I am staying away from the 4R70 because it basically requires installing a computer (PCM) or aftermarket unit.
Well I am staying away from the 4R70 because it basically requires installing a computer (PCM) or aftermarket unit.
That's what makes the 4R that much better. You control everything the Trans does to suit your driving style. Plus you can find a low mile 4R for 2-300 bucks. No such thing as a low mile aod anymore so then you're talking rebuild $$
That's what makes the 4R that much better. You control everything the Trans does to suit your driving style. Plus you can find a low mile 4R for 2-300 bucks. No such thing as a low mile aod anymore so then you're talking rebuild $$
Maybe in Utah, but around here JY 4R70's go in the $600-800 range and the newest ones are over 10 years old. I've got an AOD with 70K on it, and most of the 4R70's I see are in the 150K range.
Do you know if anyone makes an adapter to mount that transmission on a flathead?
I checked car-part and found quite a few 4Rs for $2-300 with 50-80k miles in Tennessee. The V6 windsor pattern 4R70s seem to go for way cheaper than the modular 4r. The V6's just didn't tear them up so nobody needs em
I checked car-part and found quite a few 4Rs for $2-300 with 50-80k miles in Tennessee. The V6 windsor pattern 4R70s seem to go for way cheaper than the modular 4r. The V6's just didn't tear them up so nobody needs em
Bob Bendtsen says that you want the non-modular 4R70W.
parasitic loss is certainly something to think about with the AOD/4R70. How much HP does a mildly built/refreshed Flathead put out? Between an AOD and 4R though the 4R is a better transmission in every way
If you are worried about parasitic loss it looks like a GM Powerglide is the way to go.
Those loss numbers being in HP always bugged me. They are from a Car Craft test where they were running hard -- these numbers are the PEAK losses from some very potent cars, well over 400 HP. You don't see such big losses driving around town, or running at 25% throttle on the interstates.
I read the Car Craft test article a long, long time ago, and it didn't strike me as either very scientific or apples-to-apples. They did some more recent tests that included comparisons with manual trannies, and the manuals weren't hugely different.
PS -- they noted in their tests that much of the losses were due to spinning the weight of the planetaries, AND that heavier planetaries are associated with the trannies that have a reputation for being reliable... choose your poison.
Those loss numbers being in HP always bugged me. They are from a Car Craft test where they were running hard -- these numbers are the PEAK losses from some very potent cars, well over 400 HP. You don't see such big losses driving around town, or running at 25% throttle on the interstates.
I read the Car Craft test article a long, long time ago, and it didn't strike me as either very scientific or apples-to-apples. They did some more recent tests that included comparisons with manual trannies, and the manuals weren't hugely different.
PS -- they noted in their tests that much of the losses were due to spinning the weight of the planetaries, AND that heavier planetaries are associated with the trannies that have a reputation for being reliable... choose your poison.
Yes, it looked like it was done a while ago. I wasn't as concerned about the numbers as the relative comparisons.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.