Notices

My 400 EFI Project

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 10, 2015 | 09:02 PM
  #1  
smandzak's Avatar
smandzak
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 72
Likes: 3
From: Royal Oak, MI
My 400 EFI Project

This winter's project was to join the 400 EFI club, so thought I would share some of the details. Maybe it will give somebody an idea.

Basic concept of the setup:
- Megasquirt MS3-Pro
- Edelbrock 2171 intake w/ injector bungs added
- Edelbrock 4 barrel throttle body w/ PWM IAC
- 5.0L Explorer fuel rail & 6.2L injectors (33 lb)
- 7.5L TFI distributor (remote style)
- 7.5L Mass Air Filter
- 80mm Lightning MAF
- 1985 7.5L tank fuel pump senders
- LC-1 wideband & other standard Ford sensors


Intake up first:

Using a new intake I made a rig to hold the intake in a fixed position so I could drill the intake bung holes with a drill press. Ford seems to have tilted the injectors over 22.5 degrees side to side on 5.0L's but that wouldn't have left enough room at the center for the throttle body. So I compromised with a 15 degree angle to have the best compromise of angling towards the back of the intake valve while keeping enough room for the throttle body. The drill press table was then angled 15 degrees to match the angle that Ford used for the injector front to back tilt. I was able to find a good distance away from the flange that let me keep the vacuum ports (not too far inboard) and entering the port right at the top (not too far outboard).



With a fence on the table I was able to drill a hole, slide the intake to the next runner and drill the next. I had to go slow and it vibrated a bit more than I would have liked but it got done pretty quickly.



The holes turned out accurate enough but the bungs needed to be held in place due to them sliding too deep or not quite keeping in line. It was also a balance of the lower runners having the bung not too high and higher runners not too low. To make sure the welding shop didn't have to think about it I made up a way too complicated rig to hold them in line. The square tube was drilled with the same angle so it forced everything to the right spacing. Chunks of copper tubing were cut to set the depth, and then the nuts just kept things snug. (BTW they were parallel but the camera made them look not)



I don't have a TIG so a local shop welded it up for a surprisingly low price. All I had to do after they were done was knock down the extra bung material in the runners with a carbide bit.



I liked the 5.0L Explorer fuel rail setup so I had picked up a junkyard set. I changed the cross over tubing (with Aeroquip 4AN socketless) to compensate for the extra intake width.



Couldn't help mocking it up. I can even sneak the cruise control through it all.




Air intake:

I knew I wanted to run MAF so one day I wandered a junk yard for a couple hours and grabbed a few air filter assemblies that I thought may work. In the end one from a 96 F350 MAF 7.5L worked the best. It was narrow enough to sit between the battery and radiator with a simple bracket and had the same MAF bolt pattern as a Lightning. On from there was a duct and a TBI hat from a Dodge.




Wiring:

From the Diyautotune kit I received 8' of unterminated harness and so I went about adding in power wires, grounds, connectors, etc. Fuel injector subharnesses were made (not pictured so it looks a little too simple). There are many wires that I don't need so they were terminated at Delphi GT150 connectors so I can easily plug something into it in the future.



BTW even though its a TFI distributor I never used the actual TFI module. The ECU picks up the signal directly from the distributor sensor and then commands the MSD when to fire.

I mounted the ECU where the duraspark used to be and from there the harness runs across the top of the firewall and then down along the passenger side of the intake. A power wire from the battery gets everything power, and the vehicle duraspark connector triggers the relay with key on.




Fuel supply:

I figured out that fuel senders from a 1984-85 F350 7.5L were a great match as they had:
- same small fuel tank mounting hole size
- low pressure pump
- return line
- fuel level sender with the same resistance sweep

The rear sender was a direct swap other than the extra harness pin to power the pump. (Airtex E2089S)



The center tank was slightly more work but not too much. The flange hole on a 79 F150 is more on the side of the tank than an 85, so right above the sender card I bent the tubes to match my original. (Airtex E2091S) The filter sock now sits on the bottom of the tank and the float sits at the right spot for empty & full. (Before & after)





The in tank pumps only provide low pressure, so they connect to a switching valve and then on to a frame rail mounted high pressure pump (front tank not yet reinstalled).



The factory fuel line was used as the return and I ran a new supply line using socketless hose (6AN). Unfortunately the only fuel rail spring lock connectors I could find with a 3/8 barb & through hole was AN type so had to go that way but it looks nice (and expensive ). Other joints are all plastic quick connect type.




After final assembly we got it running without too much difficulty. I had a few settings wrong that took a little time to figure out but now its driveable and the tuning is ongoing. The only things left are to loom some of the remaining wiring, connect the kickdown lever, and see if I can get a progressive throttle pulley to make it less sensitive (hitting bumps demonstrates throttle response quite well and my inability to hold my foot still enough).

I'm still amazed how it can happily idle at 15:1 AFR and rev like a modern engine.

 

Last edited by smandzak; Feb 11, 2015 at 08:45 PM. Reason: try to get pictures to work for everyone
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2015 | 07:24 AM
  #2  
Gary Lewis's Avatar
Gary Lewis
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 32,875
Likes: 48
From: Northeast, OK
That's a great story, but I really wish I could see the pictures. Anyone else have that problem?

Anyway, it idles at 15:1, but where does it run on the road? And the throttle response is quick, but what about power?
 
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2015 | 11:47 AM
  #3  
f100beatertruck's Avatar
f100beatertruck
Cargo Master
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,408
Likes: 5
From: Parkesburg PA
Club FTE Silver Member

I have that problem too.

Are you running MAF with MS3?
 
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2015 | 04:19 PM
  #4  
daves77crew's Avatar
daves77crew
Cross-Country
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
What a great setup, This is what I would like to do to my truck.
How are you able to tune this setup?
 
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2015 | 09:09 PM
  #5  
smandzak's Avatar
smandzak
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 72
Likes: 3
From: Royal Oak, MI
Well that was unexpected, pictures would work fine in Chrome & Firefox but not IE apparently. I switched them over from hosting on Google Drive to directly on the forum, so hopefully they work now for everyone.

To answer the questions so far:

AFR tries to achieve whatever I command via a table, generally running down the road is around 14.7:1 and near WOT it will target around 13:1.



Power is quite good, haven't been able to test WOT much in this weather, but I am certainly not down any power from before. And its also more usable since there is no awkward transitions to secondaries.

Yes, the MAF is the primary input with this setup on the MS3. I have a MAP connected, but at the moment its just along for the ride and not used in any calculations.

Tuning is done with Tunerstudio software. I have a USB port mounted to the firewall that I connect up to with my laptop. So generally I have the laptop on the passenger seat logging data to look at later (target AFR vs what actually happened) but I can also tweak things when stopped at a light. Definitely will take some effort to make it perfect and not stumble anywhere, but should just require seat time and careful changes.


 
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2015 | 09:54 PM
  #6  
Gary Lewis's Avatar
Gary Lewis
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 32,875
Likes: 48
From: Northeast, OK
Thanks for fixing the pics, but I'm using Chrome on this Windows machine and Safari on the iPad and they didn't work on either.

Anyway, looks good!
 
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2015 | 11:43 AM
  #7  
wyoming4x4's Avatar
wyoming4x4
Posting Guru
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,937
Likes: 2
From: wyoming
Very cool! Nice setup!
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2015 | 07:39 AM
  #8  
derbydad276's Avatar
derbydad276
Senior User
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 124
Likes: 1
From: canton michigan
Cool ... what did it cost you? compared to a a F.A.S.T or a MSD EZ EFI?
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-2

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-5

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-7

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Feb 22, 2015 | 08:39 PM
  #9  
smandzak's Avatar
smandzak
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 72
Likes: 3
From: Royal Oak, MI
Ugh, I was avoiding adding it all up, but I just did for what would be required to replicate this with the basic components and it would be about $2600.

That includes the LC-1 and all the other hardware (but left the MSD 6AL out). Big unavoidable costs for me were the MS3 Pro kit ($1200) and throttle body ($480). Grabbing the junkyard parts kept the costs down pretty good on things that don't go bad. I have a few extra things that aren't necessary (fuel & oil pressure transducers, etc), but they only added about $200.

Overall pretty similar to a basic aftermarket TBI based kits and much cheaper than the multiport setups.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AbandonedBronco
Ford Inline Six, 200, 250, 4.9L / 300
153
Dec 18, 2023 03:41 PM
petrokiller
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
17
Sep 16, 2015 04:40 PM
Holehawgg
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
71
Mar 3, 2015 09:08 AM
landmobile
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
2
Apr 18, 2012 01:45 PM
gt40racing
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
4
Apr 17, 2012 11:11 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:59 PM.

story-0
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-4
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-6
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-7
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-8
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE